Quote from: Ecclesia Militans

Quote from: SeanJohnson

Unless Fr. Beck tells me I can no longer attend, I will continue to do so.

Even after everything that has taken place thus far?

It would be caving in to intimidation.

It would be caving in to injustice.

It would represent surrender.

I cannot choose to deprive myself and my family of the sacraments; it is not a matter in which I consider myself to have freedom to decide.

I was once the golden boy of that parish, running the bookstore as a good public face, and the go-to man for those visiting the chapel who wanted to gain an understanding of what the SSPX was all about.

The priest would send such people my way, because he knew me to have an eloquent and intimate knowledge of the SSPX positions.

Sedevacantists, indultarians, Feenyites, Novus Ordinarians, or those with questions about supplied jurisdiction or our position vis-a-vis Rome were all sent my way for a presentation of what we were all about.

But today I am a subversive traitor for pointing out that Vatican II is not implicitly contained in tradition, contrary to what Bishop Fellay signed.

I am a Judas for objecting to the scandalous agreement he signed willing to accept the new code of canon law.

I am a hyppocrite for being outraged by his acknowledgement of the legitimacy of the new Mass.

I am a dissident for recalling Archbishop Lefebvre's post-1988 position that there be no practical accord without the conversion of Rome to tradition.

Yet 5 years ago, everyone instigating for my banishment held my same position.

Or did they?

Sean,
It's embarrassing reading your posts.  Remember it's about your Resistance.  It's not about you.