Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Militant Anti-Resistance Sermon in St Paul, MN:  (Read 18257 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline SeanJohnson

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15060
  • Reputation: +10006/-3163
  • Gender: Male
Militant Anti-Resistance Sermon in St Paul, MN:
« Reply #45 on: June 10, 2013, 09:06:53 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: magdalena
    Quote from: SeanJohnson
    Quote from: magdalena
    Interesting thought, Sean.  What I think is that a lot of people will leave and never return due to his visit.  And they won't necessarily be the "dissidents".    


    You might be right, but I had the opposite impression:

    The ignorant, brain-dead masses who remained deliberately ignorant on the issues found him to be quite persuasive.

    It was like audible Soma for them.



    It was quiet.  You could have heard a pin drop.  But I think that kind of thing turns decent people away--at least gentler hearts and newcomers.  They'll go find an indult parish somewhere, which is what the SSPX is sadly becoming anyhow.

    And, of course, it didn't help that he was our former pastor.  Father Rostand should have sent someone else.  It makes it hurt that much more.  


    Wait until next week.
    Rom 5: 20 - "But where sin increased, grace abounded all the more."

    Offline dwintell

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 3
    • Reputation: +2/-0
    • Gender: Male
    Militant Anti-Resistance Sermon in St Paul, MN:
    « Reply #46 on: June 11, 2013, 04:12:32 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: SeanJohnson
    Quote from: magdalena
    It's sad.  People are there to save their souls, and they are being threatened with expulsion.


    Interesting observation:

    Fr Webber had managed to maintain peace in our parish until Fr Rutledge's visit.

    His visit killed it.

    Whose sin is greater:

    Fr Rutledge's, or those few meddlesome families that instigated his arrival?









    Offline John Grace

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 5521
    • Reputation: +121/-6
    • Gender: Male
    Militant Anti-Resistance Sermon in St Paul, MN:
    « Reply #47 on: June 11, 2013, 04:16:48 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote
    The ignorant, brain-dead masses who remained deliberately ignorant on the issues found him to be quite persuasive.


    Similar in Ireland with the Bishop Fellay and Fr Pfluger. Some found them both persuasive.

    Offline SeanJohnson

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 15060
    • Reputation: +10006/-3163
    • Gender: Male
    Militant Anti-Resistance Sermon in St Paul, MN:
    « Reply #48 on: June 12, 2013, 10:50:16 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: SeanJohnson
    Quote from: magdalena
    It's sad.  People are there to save their souls, and they are being threatened with expulsion.


    Interesting observation:

    Fr Webber had managed to maintain peace in our parish until Fr Rutledge's visit.

    His visit killed it.

    Whose sin is greater:

    Fr Rutledge's, or those few meddlesome families that instigated his arrival?









    After some reflection, I would like to amend the wording of this particular post.

    I should not accuse of sin.

    Rather, it would be better to say:

    "Whose responsibility is greater: Fr. Rutledge's, or those meddlesome families that instigated his arrival?"

    Apologies to Fr Rutledge on this particular point.

    Rom 5: 20 - "But where sin increased, grace abounded all the more."

    Offline dwintell

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 3
    • Reputation: +2/-0
    • Gender: Male
    Militant Anti-Resistance Sermon in St Paul, MN:
    « Reply #49 on: June 12, 2013, 11:51:22 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • There was not a peace, but tolerance.
    A person such as yourself is making that less possible.
    You are a dissident, you are a hypocrite. You were not threatened with expulsion, but asked to leave.
    It,s an SSPX Chapel and so reasonable that an SSPX priest would express the sentiments of the SSPX there. Why are you still there?


    Offline Columba

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 552
    • Reputation: +729/-0
    • Gender: Male
    Militant Anti-Resistance Sermon in St Paul, MN:
    « Reply #50 on: June 12, 2013, 12:17:13 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: dwintell
    There was not a peace, but tolerance.
    A person such as yourself is making that less possible.
    You are a dissident, you are a hypocrite. You were not threatened with expulsion, but asked to leave.
    It,s an SSPX Chapel and so reasonable that an SSPX priest would express the sentiments of the SSPX there. Why are you still there?

    Were those "sentiments of the SSPX" Catholic? If not, then a Catholic has the duty to resist those sentiments.

    Offline John Grace

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 5521
    • Reputation: +121/-6
    • Gender: Male
    Militant Anti-Resistance Sermon in St Paul, MN:
    « Reply #51 on: June 12, 2013, 12:21:15 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: dwintell
    There was not a peace, but tolerance.
    A person such as yourself is making that less possible.
    You are a dissident, you are a hypocrite. You were not threatened with expulsion, but asked to leave.
    It,s an SSPX Chapel and so reasonable that an SSPX priest would express the sentiments of the SSPX there. Why are you still there?


    dwintell,

    What is your opinion regarding the blasphemy of the Mother of God by Bishop Fellay and using the Holy Rosary to deceive both priests and laity?

    If you are going to hector SeanJohnson, will you answer that question.

    Also should Bishop Fellay face a tribunal?

    Offline John Grace

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 5521
    • Reputation: +121/-6
    • Gender: Male
    Militant Anti-Resistance Sermon in St Paul, MN:
    « Reply #52 on: June 12, 2013, 12:24:22 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote
    You are a dissident


    The taunts and jeers from the Church of Bishop Fellay drive on the resistance. The resistance is a noble crusade which has the blessing of Almighty God.



    Offline John Grace

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 5521
    • Reputation: +121/-6
    • Gender: Male
    Militant Anti-Resistance Sermon in St Paul, MN:
    « Reply #53 on: June 12, 2013, 12:28:48 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quite suitable for the resistance.


    Offline JPaul

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 3832
    • Reputation: +3723/-293
    • Gender: Male
    Militant Anti-Resistance Sermon in St Paul, MN:
    « Reply #54 on: June 12, 2013, 12:40:00 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote
    Next thing you know, that'll be in the new instructions for confession:

     "Bless me Father, for I have been negative.  It's been two weeks
     since my last Confession..."


    I am firmly resolved, with the help of Thy Grace,

    To confess my negatives,

    To do penance,

    And to remain positive in my life

    AMEN!

    Offline SeanJohnson

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 15060
    • Reputation: +10006/-3163
    • Gender: Male
    Militant Anti-Resistance Sermon in St Paul, MN:
    « Reply #55 on: June 12, 2013, 12:41:35 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: dwintell
    There was not a peace, but tolerance.
    A person such as yourself is making that less possible.
    You are a dissident, you are a hypocrite. You were not threatened with expulsion, but asked to leave.
    It,s an SSPX Chapel and so reasonable that an SSPX priest would express the sentiments of the SSPX there. Why are you still there?


    This is a telling post:

    1) It acknowledges that under Fr. Webber there was civility;

    2) But according to this post, there was hatred under the surface of the accordista civility (which was not always civil);

    3) Our existance must be blotted out from the chapel;

    4) No thought given to the consequences of depriving others of the sacraments, or bearing responsibility for that instigation, should it occur;

    5) Only of snuffing out our voices;

    6) Voices which have always been very discrete at the chapel (at least mine);

    7) But they have decided no longer to "tolerate" us.

    8) So they have preferred open warfare, regardless of the consequences to souls, or division in the parish which they are instigating;

    9)  Tell me, how is a person such as myself making it less possible for you to act in a manner becomming Catholics?

    10) Did you see me single out any parishioner for attack (as Harry Peterson has publicly done)?

    11) For the record, I have not been asked to leave, and will continue attending until told to abstain.

    12) Why am I still there?

    13) Because my beliefs are the same as they ever were, but were never a problem until forced to choose between truth and authority (which are no longer united);

    14) Because it is my strict right to be there;

    15) Because so long as Fr. Webber remains, the faith is safeguarded, whatever is happening elsewhere in the SSPX;

    16) Because I refuse to be intimidated by the attack campaign now apparently organized to drive us from our rightful parish;

    17) Because it is you that should be leaving, and not I;

    18) Because I have always been discrete at the chapel, arriving precisely at Mass time, and leaving immediately after, and avoiding confrontational situations by staying out of the basement after Mass.

    Unless Fr. Beck tells me I can no longer attend, I will continue to do so.
    Rom 5: 20 - "But where sin increased, grace abounded all the more."


    Offline Beatifico

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 28
    • Reputation: +0/-0
    • Gender: Male
    Militant Anti-Resistance Sermon in St Paul, MN:
    « Reply #56 on: June 12, 2013, 12:43:12 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Columba
    Quote from: dwintell
    There was not a peace, but tolerance.
    A person such as yourself is making that less possible.
    You are a dissident, you are a hypocrite. You were not threatened with expulsion, but asked to leave.
    It,s an SSPX Chapel and so reasonable that an SSPX priest would express the sentiments of the SSPX there. Why are you still there?

    Were those "sentiments of the SSPX" Catholic? If not, then a Catholic has the duty to resist those sentiments.


    Those “sentiments” included using the name of His Excellency Bishop Williamson and thus resulting in a sacrilege.  Being without facts those “sentiments” were just  not true.

    Offline Ecclesia Militans

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 984
    • Reputation: +14/-35
    • Gender: Male
    Militant Anti-Resistance Sermon in St Paul, MN:
    « Reply #57 on: June 12, 2013, 01:09:19 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: SeanJohnson
    Unless Fr. Beck tells me I can no longer attend, I will continue to do so.

    Even after everything that has taken place thus far?

    Offline SeanJohnson

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 15060
    • Reputation: +10006/-3163
    • Gender: Male
    Militant Anti-Resistance Sermon in St Paul, MN:
    « Reply #58 on: June 12, 2013, 01:22:29 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Ecclesia Militans
    Quote from: SeanJohnson
    Unless Fr. Beck tells me I can no longer attend, I will continue to do so.

    Even after everything that has taken place thus far?


    It would be caving in to intimidation.

    It would be caving in to injustice.

    It would represent surrender.

    I cannot choose to deprive myself and my family of the sacraments; it is not a matter in which I consider myself to have freedom to decide.

    I was once the golden boy of that parish, running the bookstore as a good public face, and the go-to man for those visiting the chapel who wanted to gain an understanding of what the SSPX was all about.

    The priest would send such people my way, because he knew me to have an eloquent and intimate knowledge of the SSPX positions.

    Sedevacantists, indultarians, Feenyites, Novus Ordinarians, or those with questions about supplied jurisdiction or our position vis-a-vis Rome were all sent my way for a presentation of what we were all about.

    But today I am a subversive traitor for pointing out that Vatican II is not implicitly contained in tradition, contrary to what Bishop Fellay signed.

    I am a Judas for objecting to the scandalous agreement he signed willing to accept the new code of canon law.

    I am a hyppocrite for being outraged by his acknowledgement of the legitimacy of the new Mass.

    I am a dissident for recalling Archbishop Lefebvre's post-1988 position that there be no practical accord without the conversion of Rome to tradition.

    Yet 5 years ago, everyone instigating for my banishment held my same position.

    Or did they?





    Rom 5: 20 - "But where sin increased, grace abounded all the more."

    Offline Sienna629

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 345
    • Reputation: +363/-5
    • Gender: Female
    Militant Anti-Resistance Sermon in St Paul, MN:
    « Reply #59 on: June 12, 2013, 02:26:37 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: s2srea
    Sean Johnson- Please be assured of my prayers for you and your family. This crisis clearly affects some more than others. Thank you very much for relaying the information you heard and passing it on. And though it is self-beneficial, your posting of the counter-arguments is also very beneficial to read as well!

    What would be excellent is a debate between a Resistance priest and NeoSSPX preiest.

    Wait- even better- between +Fellay and +Williamson!

     :popcorn:


    I seriously don't think +Williamson would want to waste his time. There would be no point. We wouldn't convince the Accordistas, and they certainly wouldn't change our minds!

    The Resistance knows where it is at, so we move on, and use our time and resources more wisely.