Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 58 59 [60] 61 62 ... 66

Author Topic: Michael Voris Publishes Article on SSPX Abuse  (Read 46177 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Viva Cristo Rey

Re: Michael Voris Publishes Article on SSPX Abuse
« Reply #295 on: June 15, 2020, 04:16:01 PM »
Quote from: Viva Cristo Rey on June 01, 2020, 05:56:57 PM
Direct your anger at the  perverts and their enablers.  
That’s right because much of the laity condoned it by worshipping the priest instead of God.   
Logged

Offline Viva Cristo Rey

Re: Michael Voris Publishes Article on SSPX Abuse
« Reply #296 on: June 15, 2020, 04:17:31 PM »
How many cases of rape and molestations?  
Logged

Offline Ladislaus

  • Supporter
Re: Michael Voris Publishes Article on SSPX Abuse
« Reply #297 on: June 15, 2020, 05:51:39 PM »
Quote from: Viva Cristo Rey on June 15, 2020, 04:16:01 PM
That’s right because much of the laity condoned it by worshipping the priest instead of God.  

That's the same garbage Voris is spouting.  There's no evidence that anyone condoned pederasty.  If some people, in an excess of loyalty to a given priest or to the Society, wrongly found the charges not to be credible, that's a different issue altogether.  There no truth to your assertion that "much" of the laity condones pederasty.
Logged

Offline Ladislaus

  • Supporter
Re: Michael Voris Publishes Article on SSPX Abuse
« Reply #298 on: June 15, 2020, 05:53:38 PM »
Quote from: Viva Cristo Rey on June 01, 2020, 05:56:57 PM
Direct your anger at the  perverts and their enablers.  

You too are posing a false dilemma, that if you do not believe everything that Voris spouts, then it must mean that you are a supporter of perverts.  It's not an all or nothing proposition either.  There appears to be merit in SOME of the allegations made by Voris, while others are pure trash.
Logged

Offline Sam Smith

Re: Michael Voris Publishes Article on SSPX Abuse
« Reply #299 on: June 19, 2020, 11:03:20 AM »
Quote from: Ladislaus on May 31, 2020, 02:45:22 PM
 IMO, if anyone with the SSPX should have been consecrated a bishop, it's Fr. Jenkins.
Agreed.
Maybe he still will get consecrated. But, it will be even better now because he is NOT with the SSPX any longer.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 58 59 [60] 61 62 ... 66
« previous next »