Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 44 45 [46] 47 48 ... 66

Author Topic: Michael Voris Publishes Article on SSPX Abuse  (Read 46245 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Incredulous

Re: Michael Voris Publishes Article on SSPX Abuse
« Reply #225 on: April 27, 2020, 12:10:21 PM »
Quote from: Sam Smith on April 27, 2020, 09:34:11 AM
The USCCB are primarily judaizing ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖs!
So there you have it:
One HIV judaizing homo funded by Opus Dei can outshine the entire US bishoprics.
Logged

Offline Sam Smith

Re: Michael Voris Publishes Article on SSPX Abuse
« Reply #226 on: April 27, 2020, 12:29:03 PM »
Quote from: JezusDeKoning on April 27, 2020, 02:07:29 AM
Read this link. It points out how much of Voris' story is manufactured hogwash.
Or you can listen to Voris tell his life story here in 2018:

Logged

Offline Sam Smith

Re: Michael Voris Publishes Article on SSPX Abuse
« Reply #227 on: April 27, 2020, 12:42:31 PM »
Quote from: JezusDeKoning on April 27, 2020, 02:07:29 AM
Read this link. It points out how much of Voris' story is manufactured hogwash.
Come to think of it, thanks for posting that link. I had no idea Voris had spoken of "Not Born That Way" in 2016.

Very edifying! He's a smart man.



Logged

Offline madwoman

Re: Michael Voris Publishes Article on SSPX Abuse
« Reply #228 on: April 27, 2020, 01:09:56 PM »
Sam, according to the article, the SSPX found The two priests you mention guilty.  Then these two priest who I guess were under some house arrest of some kind, left to join the resistance.  Does the resistance know the back ground and are they still active priests.  I realize this article is a few years old. 

I knew nothing about any of this till two days ago.  As I said, if even a tiny bit of this is true, what a sad day for the church.
Logged

Offline 2Vermont

Re: Michael Voris Publishes Article on SSPX Abuse
« Reply #229 on: April 27, 2020, 03:29:30 PM »
Quote from: madwoman on April 27, 2020, 01:09:56 PM
Sam, according to the article, the SSPX found The two priests you mention guilty.  Then these two priest who I guess were under some house arrest of some kind, left to join the resistance.  Does the resistance know the back ground and are they still active priests.  I realize this article is a few years old.

I knew nothing about any of this till two days ago.  As I said, if even a tiny bit of this is true, what a sad day for the church.
Sam, in the other thread you said you were "Resistance" and that you don't give the SSPX the benefit of the doubt because they did nothing 3 years ago.  I am guessing you are referring to this, yes?  
If so, it sounds like the SSPX found these priests guilty....and then they left to go to the Resistance.  What do you think of these priests being in the Resistance which you say you support?  Were you as adamant about that? 
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 44 45 [46] 47 48 ... 66
« previous next »