Agreed.  These are serious questions that DO need to be addressed.  But the legitimate points are actually buried.  That's why I say Voris did a great disservice by burying it in nonsense.  +Williamson's response has been that, in the heat of the sedevacanist vs. R&R battle that was raging at the time, he was persuaded by Urrutigoity that it had been a politically-motivated accusation.

+Lefebvre told Fr. Williamson that Urrutigoity needed to be watched "like a hawk".  But when I was there with him, there was no such watching going on.  Fr. Urrutigoity was a veritable cult leader with a group of 7-8 seminarians with whom he formed a tightly-knit circle.  Both my brother Steve (the one on the cancer prayer thread) and I spoke about how we couldn't figure out what the fascination was with that guy.  Well, now we know.  Both Steve and I could go on for a long time.  Steve's run-in with then-Fr. Urrutigoity was the reason he was let go from the seminary.

There's no doubt that the SSPX BADLY MISHANDLED this case.  None whatsoever.  Now, this was before the whole pederasty scandal blew up years later, and perhaps there was some naivete involved.  We may never know.

Really, the best thing that the SSPX could do as a defense is to acknowledge and ask forgiveness for the incidents that they mishandled.  "In the case of

• , we acknowledge that the situation was badly mishandled, and we ask forgiveness from God for it."  So admit the wrongdoing in some of those cases, and that will make your defense of the false allegations to be more credible.

Question: I completely agree that MV/CM is not the one who should be making these allegations, etc.  In your opinions, who would be credible to do this?

Yes, there was likely mismanagement. But like Voris, TIA has an ax to grind against the SSPX, and always has done, and so neither is a good source for an honest account of the situation.

You would think, with the doctrinal strictness of Catholicism, and today, the Traditional kind, there wouldn’t be a lot of attraction for homos. 

All of you who are focused on Voris, as though he were the real problem, are missing a very real supernatural component to these events:

God is ALLOWING the SSPX to be SCOURGED. He has withdrawn His hand.

Our Lord is allowing their crimes, misdeeds, mismanagements, coverups, abuse, scandals, inactions, to be brought to LIGHT.

Michael Voris is just one of the tools with which Our Lord has chosen to make His will known. The same can be said of Jassy Jacas.

The hand-wringing displayed here over the "attacks" on the Church (as though it were a bad thing) shows you are fundamentally missing the point.

God is going to purify His Church, (the Novus Ordo, the SSPX, the FSSP, the Resistance, all of it) whether you like it or not!

He is NOT going to allow you, or anyone, to be complicit in continuing to cover up for evil deeds. You are not going to stop Him!

This is what the End of Days is all about. It is the unveiling of all evil. And we are close!

"For there is nothing secret, that shall not be made manifest, nor anything hidden that will not be made known."

When I asked the question, I was wondering about someone outside of the SSPX, Resistance, Sede, Novus Ordo groups.  I'm not sure who that would/could be!

I understand that you believe that Our Lord is using Michael Voris as His chosen tool. But just because some of us do not find Voris to be credible doesn't mean that we are complicit in covering up for evil deeds, as you have accused above. Do you understand the difference?

We know full-well that the SSPX is far from perfect.