Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Michael Voris Publishes Article on SSPX Abuse  (Read 46165 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online Ladislaus

  • Supporter
Re: Michael Voris Publishes Article on SSPX Abuse
« Reply #290 on: May 31, 2020, 02:45:22 PM »
I can't believe I'm saying this about the SSPV, but Fr. Jenkins gives the best assessment of the SSPX/Voris issue that I've seen thus far. He brings up many thought-provoking ideas, and he's respectful of all parties, but truthful and realistic at the same time.

Good assessment, too, about the Coronavirus problem, in the 2nd half of the talk.

Fr. Jenkins is a great priest with his head screwed on straight.  He's also a terrific preacher and a brilliant man.  IMO, if anyone with the SSPX should have been consecrated a bishop, it's Fr. Jenkins.

Re: Michael Voris Publishes Article on SSPX Abuse
« Reply #291 on: May 31, 2020, 03:35:32 PM »
Tradcast, Fisher More, some King thing - I had to look it up, but nothing made it clear and quick, but I got: Tradcast is Sedevacantist (and I am not); King thing was 2010, so I don't know if TM's views on whatever happened have evolved; Fisher More is the college is TM's hometown (or nearby) that he was apparently involved with, then not, because of not being happy about something with King.

But I am not motivated to find out more, because of course it's expected that Tradcast would not like Infiltration because they think every single thing since Vatican II is not real, so, there is no church itself to infiltrate. Also no surprise that they could find ways to pick it apart. Remembering that Rose's Goodbye, Good Men was not good enough as an expose\t for many. One can always find points of a thing to argue, and argue endlessly, especially if they cross our preconceived ideas. Especially ideas we are very committed to.
So, if you are Sedevacantist, the only church existing to be infiltrated would be SSPX. Oh, and we see that happened. Only, it's same same MO used on the NO church.
I was Evangelical Christian before converting, and in that path one must use discernment, without the actual Church teachings to consult, but only the Bible, and whoever seems most expert and pious to interpret. I was interested always in becoming "more Christian", and cult-like groups often claimed to be that, and they looked more Christian. But looking closer, I saw patterns of things not right. So when I became Catholic and saw so much wrong in our NO Church, I looked a bit at SSPX, and saw some of those same marks - more Christian, convinced they were the only right ones, i.e. But also what concerned me was the unquestioning loyalty to a hierarchy that has no transparency. I know that is not a good thing, that it is a breeding ground for abuse of power, in all manners. Look what it invites and harbors. : (  I am sorry for all those who are suffering because of the truth of the CM revelations, and I am aghast at those in denial, claiming CM is just out to get SSPX. How silly. But sad.
Not commenting on the thread topic per say (SSPX), just Taylor Marshall. To me he is a phony subversive guy. Not to be taken seriously let alone trusted. Tradcast did not refer to sedvacantism in it's review, just that TM's book was poorly written without the due diligence research the topic called for. TM is an ace manipulator (remember his role in the destruction of Pachymama? He had to let us know it was an arranged event and his idea...along with his Coronavirus hero that tossed the idol. It all sounds contrived to me. I don't trust him, sorry.
PS, I an not a sede but actually listen and read many different positions in order to form my own. In fact you should listen to Fr Jenkin's very balanced assessment of the CM SSPX issue in the video above.


Re: Michael Voris Publishes Article on SSPX Abuse
« Reply #292 on: May 31, 2020, 10:30:48 PM »
Voris' go to 'victim' is Jassy Jacas in whom law enforcement could place no credibility. This exposé seems to draw from, or draws from the same source as a Swedish docuмentary which made a great of unsupported calumnies against Resistance priests. I suspect after this pan cake flat stuff has been eaten, there will be a few meager bits served up.

Fr Jenkins SSPV remarks on the matter covers what he sees as an attitude among the SSPX and problems created by 'partial communion':



 

I wasn't so impressed with Fr. Jenkins interview for the following reasons:


1. Father failed to acknowledge what the accuser, Church Militant represents.  

   Voris, in his own show has endorsed the h0Ɩ0cαųst, the Noahide Laws, and Opus Dei.
   Voris, working from an Opus Dei buidling, is a funded front for them.
   
   But Father's assessment failed to make the connection of the political motivations behind CM's
   rash suspicions and rash judgements.

2.  It was a great opportunity for SSPX's sede rival to dig into all of the Society's problems.  
    But Father's linkage of the sex scandals to the SSPX's more recent, modernist sympathies was out of context.  
    Most of the SSPX scandals Voris dredged-up were way before the Roman dialogues.   But it served Father's purpose as a whipping boy.  

3. I had to laugh when Father turned the question of a disaffected SSPXer into a Pius V recruitment pitch :jester:

   He forgot to tell the lady that she had to believe in multiple Baptisms (4 presumably), renounce the indult, FSSP and Thuc line ordinations.

4. Father's corona-hoax assessment, ignored the fact that Americans are finally realizing that our government is constantly lying and trying to kill us.
   He needs to address the Gate's diabolical vaccine issue.  As Catholics, we may not accept it.  
   Any wavering on this point reeks of cowardice and/or a hireling mentality.

Re: Michael Voris Publishes Article on SSPX Abuse
« Reply #293 on: June 01, 2020, 05:56:57 PM »
You’re using articles from a man who hates ALL real Traditionalists to attack the Society. Pathetic
Direct your anger at the  perverts and their enablers.