I dislike him strongly, but why bring up his past? That’s not a Catholic thing to do unless they’re unrepentant, and he seems genuinely repentant
We Catholics are our own worst enemy sometimes. Here is a man who is manifestly working in opposition of the Truth, as an aggressive, mercenary, for-profit shill for the Novus Ordo Church, and who has a past checkered enough to make him a suspect witness at best in any court of law, at least in the olden days when moral character counted for anything... who has a history of associating with bad ideas, and ruining others’ careers and reputations for his own self-centered, narcissistic ends. And we get squeamish because maybe reminding people that he’s a ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ and a thoroughly bad egg might possibly be uncharitable, and think that perhaps we should pretend he’s a university professor and restrict ourselves to only touching his ideas, in isolation.
The man is a scuмbag. His sins are public knowledge, and assuredly bear on his public words and deeds today.
Topic: Michael Voris dissected (Read 8206 times)