Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 6 7 [8] 9 10 11

Author Topic: Michael Voris dissected  (Read 8198 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline 2Vermont

Re: Michael Voris dissected
« Reply #35 on: April 27, 2020, 11:10:49 AM »
Sam, do you think it is possible that MV's allegations are not entirely true?
Logged

Offline Sam Smith

Re: Michael Voris dissected
« Reply #36 on: April 27, 2020, 11:54:11 AM »
Quote from: 2Vermont on April 27, 2020, 11:10:49 AM
Sam, do you think it is possible that MV's allegations are not entirely true?
No.
He invited them to sue him.
They won't because they can't, because it's true.
Logged

Offline Sam Smith

Re: Michael Voris dissected
« Reply #37 on: April 27, 2020, 12:23:59 PM »
Quote from: Incredulous on April 27, 2020, 10:43:48 AM
Correction:

You posted a CM video with your “courageous journalist” Christine Niles.

That’s the overweight Fillipina I was referring to.  

Working for Voris must put a lot of stress on her, causing the face-stuffing of junk food.
Fr. Morrison has weighed in.

He says the vilification against the persons of Niles (and Voris)  "is completely typical of the duplicitous morality of the Neo-SSPX under Bernie Fellay, but not of the original SSPX under its late founder, Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre, who was universally known for his gentlemanliness."

Shall I call you duplicitous now? Or just Bernie?
Logged

Offline 2Vermont

Re: Michael Voris dissected
« Reply #38 on: April 27, 2020, 12:46:31 PM »
Quote from: Sam Smith on April 27, 2020, 11:54:11 AM
No.
He invited them to sue him.
They won't because they can't, because it's true.
You are 100% sure that it's ALL true .... because he invited them to sue him? 
Logged

Offline Sam Smith

Re: Michael Voris dissected
« Reply #39 on: April 27, 2020, 12:53:42 PM »
Quote from: 2Vermont on April 27, 2020, 12:46:31 PM
You are 100% sure that it's ALL true .... because he invited them to sue him?
He's a journalist.
He knows what he has, and it sounds like it's a lot.
He's not stupid, he wouldn't run it if he could be sued. I'm sure he knows the SSPX's propensity for legal defense.
That's why he was so strong in his response. Whatever he has that is still coming must be pretty bad.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 6 7 [8] 9 10 11
« previous next »