04/29/2013
 
Message of Father Ortiz:

Dear Faithful,

I take this opportunity to thank you all for your response and the excellent organization of Fr Joseph Pfeiffer's visit.

Despite his busy schedule traveling everywhere around the world, Father immediately accepted my invitation to go to Australia to support you in the defense of the Catholic Faith.

Your answer to this visit went beyond our expectations... because, a part from a few of you with whom I was in contact these last months, I didn't know that there were so many others behind! May God bless you for your courage in front of many obstacles and for your commitment to the Resistance.

Father Pfeiffer told me that he was very much pleased and edified of what he saw in Australia. He was finally able to visit Sydney, Brisbane, Melbourne, Streaky Bay (SA) and Adelaide.

Despite of the diversity of places and the different attendances he found in your country, Father saw always the same eager desire to remain faithful to the legacy of Archb. Lefebvre and to the founding principles of the Society of St Pius X.

Now we know that Australia is another important front in the combat for what we have fought in the past years: to remain faithful to Tradition without compromising.

Don't be afraid of reprisals from neo-SSPX pastors...

Father Pfeiffer is planning to send regularly to Australia a Resistance priest, and I also want to be one of them.

And as I celebrated a Mass for the success of this visit before, I will celebrate another one tomorrow to give thanks to Our Lord and His Holy Mother for its success.

It's sad to see that some priests in the SSPX, in different degrees, are compromising with the sell-out set up by Bp. Fellay.

So, the danger is not yet over, but on the contrary it's worsening. New docuмents came to light recently, like the DOCTRINAL PREAMBLE of April 15, 2012, carrying the proof that Bp Fellay has really gone too far in his concessions to the Modernist Rome concerning matters of doctrine.

What we need to prove here is not that Bp Fellay has said heresies... but more subtly, that he's not condemning error being his duty to do so, and particularly condemning the most monstrous error in Church's history, Modernism.

In this Doctrinal Preamble, he clearly refuses to condemn the main errors of Vatican II, he affirms the legitimacy of the Novus Ordo and finally accepts the New Canon Law.

All these three elements, against which we have being fighting for some many years, are explicitly accepted in this docuмent!

Please find attached an excellent study on the Doctrinal Preamble, which I recommend you TO READ IT AND TO GIVE AROUND COPIES.

We fear that something even worse will come to light very soon : the DOCTRINAL DECLARATION, which the last General Chapter (July 2012) asked Bp. Fellay to redact, after the rejection by Rome, for "political" reasons, of Bp. Fellay's Doctrinal Preamble in June.

As you can see, the main issue in our combat is about FAITH.

We have a double duty towards Faith: to profess it and to defend it.

The defense is always characterized by the condemnation of errors, which is precisely what the leaders of the SSPX are not doing, as in the past.
This is a characterized sin of omission.

Remain "steadfast in the Faith" (St Peter).

Keep united organizing some meetings in your houses, praying, deepening your faith, and most of all in mutual charity.

God bless you all.

Fr. Juan C. Ortiz

http://www.archbishoplefebvre.com/1/archives/04-2013/1.html

Fr. Ortiz said:

"We fear that something even worse will come to light very soon : the DOCTRINAL DECLARATION, which the last General Chapter (July 2012) asked Bp. Fellay to redact, after the rejection by Rome, for "political" reasons, of Bp. Fellay's Doctrinal Preamble in June."

Question:

I am confused.

Is Fr. Ortiz saying Bishop Fellay signed 2 docuмents?

1) The April 15 doctrinal declaration (which has already been published), which was rejected by Rome in June;

2) A still secret edited version of this docuмent which took place at the July General Chapter, and subsequently re-submitted to Rome in July (which as yet has not been published)?

3) And that this 2nd declaration will be worse than the 1st???

 :surprised:

Anyone remember the old ads for the "National Inquirer"?  "Inquiring Minds Want to Know!"
Let's adapt that to "Inquiring Souls NEED to Know!"  The so-called 'Preamble' is bad enough; but the 'Declaration' is worse?  If it is indeed titled a "declaration" and is signed by Bishop Fellay without retraction, can there be any doubt that the contents are "officially" what the SSPX now believes?  What possible excuse can be made?  No amount of convoluted logic will be able to "explain it away."  
We will soon see, but arguments will not convince those who have said in their hearts, "I've made up my mind.  Don't confuse me with the facts."  Is not such an attitude a step closer to the "sin against the Holy Ghost" and final impenitence?
O.L. of Mt. Carmel, pray for us!

Good questions, SeanJohnson. It's worth doing a little inquiry. I'll try. If I get information, I come back.

04/29/2013
 
Message of Father Ortiz:

Dear Faithful,

I take this opportunity to thank you all for your response and the excellent organization of Fr Joseph Pfeiffer's visit.

Despite his busy schedule traveling everywhere around the world, Father immediately accepted my invitation to go to Australia to support you in the defense of the Catholic Faith.

Your answer to this visit went beyond our expectations... because, a part from a few of you with whom I was in contact these last months, I didn't know that there were so many others behind! May God bless you for your courage in front of many obstacles and for your commitment to the Resistance.

Father Pfeiffer told me that he was very much pleased and edified of what he saw in Australia. He was finally able to visit Sydney, Brisbane, Melbourne, Streaky Bay (SA) and Adelaide.

Despite of the diversity of places and the different attendances he found in your country, Father saw always the same eager desire to remain faithful to the legacy of Archb. Lefebvre and to the founding principles of the Society of St Pius X.

Now we know that Australia is another important front in the combat for what we have fought in the past years: to remain faithful to Tradition without compromising.

Don't be afraid of reprisals from neo-SSPX pastors...

Father Pfeiffer is planning to send regularly to Australia a Resistance priest, and I also want to be one of them.

And as I celebrated a Mass for the success of this visit before, I will celebrate another one tomorrow to give thanks to Our Lord and His Holy Mother for its success.

It's sad to see that some priests in the SSPX, in different degrees, are compromising with the sell-out set up by Bp. Fellay.

So, the danger is not yet over, but on the contrary it's worsening. New docuмents came to light recently, like the DOCTRINAL PREAMBLE of April 15, 2012, carrying the proof that Bp Fellay has really gone too far in his concessions to the Modernist Rome concerning matters of doctrine.

What we need to prove here is not that Bp Fellay has said heresies... but more subtly, that he's not condemning error being his duty to do so, and particularly condemning the most monstrous error in Church's history, Modernism.

In this Doctrinal Preamble, he clearly refuses to condemn the main errors of Vatican II, he affirms the legitimacy of the Novus Ordo and finally accepts the New Canon Law.

All these three elements, against which we have being fighting for some many years, are explicitly accepted in this docuмent!

Please find attached an excellent study on the Doctrinal Preamble, which I recommend you TO READ IT AND TO GIVE AROUND COPIES.

We fear that something even worse will come to light very soon : the DOCTRINAL DECLARATION, which the last General Chapter (July 2012) asked Bp. Fellay to redact, after the rejection by Rome, for "political" reasons, of Bp. Fellay's Doctrinal Preamble in June.

As you can see, the main issue in our combat is about FAITH.

We have a double duty towards Faith: to profess it and to defend it.

The defense is always characterized by the condemnation of errors, which is precisely what the leaders of the SSPX are not doing, as in the past.
This is a characterized sin of omission.

Remain "steadfast in the Faith" (St Peter).

Keep united organizing some meetings in your houses, praying, deepening your faith, and most of all in mutual charity.

God bless you all.

Fr. Juan C. Ortiz

http://www.archbishoplefebvre.com/1/archives/04-2013/1.html

I gave an account about a month ago about Father Pfeiffer's visit to Pakenham, Australia.  About thirty people from Tynong attended.  Since then I have kept in touch with about six people sending them updates such as this one from Fr. Ortiz.
We think Father Chazel might be coming soon.  We need to ask him a couple of very important questions.  Most SSPXers here are paralysed - too afraid to talk about the situation.   Anyway, this is just a small update taken on my own initiative.

Donkath,

 Fr. Chazal arrives in Sydney on Thursday 24th June, 2013. The itinerary will be similar to Fr Pfeiffer's in April

Sorry Donkath,

SHOULD READ THURSDAY 27TH JUNE, 2012

I got an answer from Fr Ortiz. There is no other preambule written. He wanted to say that the first preambule, written in 2011 was better than the one written on 15th April 2012. Fr Ortiz thought during a while that there was a third docuмent, because of a misunderstanding due to several names : "doctrinal declaration" and "doctrinal preambule". But there none.

.

... Please find attached an excellent study on the Doctrinal Preamble, which I recommend you TO READ IT AND TO GIVE AROUND COPIES.

It's really important to circulate these copies because people will not read
them if you just give them a link to go to.  It takes too much trouble to
read and type in a URL address.  You can send a link by e-mail and maybe
that will work, but handing them a paper copy is about the surest way you
have that they might read it.  Copy in hand is now and always has been
the most powerful means of spreading the news.  That's why newspapers
exist, you know.  That's why magazines are in business.

We fear that something even worse will come to light very soon : the DOCTRINAL DECLARATION, which the last General Chapter (July 2012) asked Bp. Fellay to redact, after the rejection by Rome, for "political" reasons, of Bp. Fellay's Doctrinal Preamble in June.

The thing you're fearing would show up one day has shown up. read the
new thread that BrJoseph started today. It's not a docuмent, but
a contract with a branding company -- some pagans who have
redefined what the Society is, for a FEE$$$$.

As you can see, the main issue in our combat is about FAITH.

We have a double duty towards Faith: to profess it and to defend it.

The defense is always characterized by the condemnation of errors, which is precisely what the leaders of the SSPX are not doing, as in the past.
This is a characterized sin of omission.

100% correct!  The condemnation of error was the power of the Keys that
Pope John XXIII hung up on a coat hook in 1962 in his M.R.S. -- and now,
the Society has bought into the same program, with the BRANDING OF
THE SSPX.

See the thread linked above.

Remain "steadfast in the Faith" (St Peter).

Keep united organizing some meetings in your houses, praying, deepening your faith, and most of all in mutual charity.

God bless you all.

Fr. Juan C. Ortiz

http://www.archbishoplefebvre.com/1/archives/04-2013/1.html

I got an answer from Fr Ortiz. There is no other preambule written. He wanted to say that the first preambule, written in 2011 was better than the one written on 15th April 2012. Fr Ortiz thought during a while that there was a third docuмent, because of a misunderstanding due to several names : "doctrinal declaration" and "doctrinal preambule". But there none.

How many times have I said that the name "preamble" should not be
used for the AFD, the Doctrinal Declaration?  It only leads to confusion.

So here is proof that I was right.  And we are going to see a lot more
confusion as different groups start talking about these things, and one
group is going to presume the other group said this when they meant
that and so on and so forth.  All of this could be avoided if a unique
name was used, and AFD is a stroke of genius -- thanks to Fr. Chazal.

When one of your own has a great idea you should use it.