Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Man arrested for email  (Read 28878 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Maverick

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 31
  • Reputation: +4/-34
  • Gender: Male
Re: Man arrested for email
« Reply #240 on: September 04, 2025, 09:40:41 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Tidbit of info from Europe: 
    Someone had a conversation with +M, inquiring about the lack of action or "Statement" re: "fr." Moran. He was told something like this:
        ' The world (media) has its ways of dealing with these stories ( creating hype etc.) ...but the Catholic Church has another way.'

    *****
    Pray.

    Tidbit? What are you talking about here, we are talking about protecting the innocence of children what kind of cryptic statement is this.

    Who spoke to the bishop? How do you know this is true? What are you even saying? Are you saying Bishop Morgan told someone you knew that the “Church” will handle it? If that’s what you’re saying what does he mean by the Church? Him and other traditional Bishops? Is he talking about the Concilliar authorities laying out justice? The civil authorities?

    If it’s him how does he explain that housing him and covering for him is the Church “helping?” Please provide clarity this kind of junk makes everyone look worse.

    Offline Maverick

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 31
    • Reputation: +4/-34
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Man arrested for email
    « Reply #241 on: September 04, 2025, 09:44:38 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!1
  • Ah, a fan.

    If you read through the thread and listen to Dr. Kavanagh's testimony you will find the information verified and collaborated. I have also spoken to resistance faithful who have left because of this man. They were not warned about this man's background.

    Please don't start a smear campaign on me to distract from this. It's too important. We already had a poster calling himself 'Truthy' doing that to the Kavanagh family which was shameful given all they had just gone through.
    Brendan Kavanagh has young children. He was recommended "a priest" by Bishop Morgan. If you check the time-frame, this happened after Moran left Ireland due to the publicity generated by the Bishop of Derry. We know he was recommended by Bishop Morgan, because Dr. Kavanaugh told us so. Before this episode, Bishop Morgan and Fr. Kavanagh were friends; Dr. Kavannagh used to teach English at the SSPX school. I know this because he used to be our son's teacher.  We also used to know Bishop Morgan quite well before he left the SSPX.
    From an email sent to a poster here by someone connected to Broadstairs, we also know that Bishop Morgan believed Moran's counter story. Yet Archbishop Vigano tells us  - a copy of the email is on this thread somewhere - they were deceived. This is supported by copies of official emails sent from Moran's former superior who confirms he was defrocked from the clerical state for "acts contrary to the sixth commandment (adultery) with a minor" and that he has been accused throughout his career for the same from different and separate organizations.

    I think you will agree that there is enough verifiable evidence to support the need for some serious clarification and reassurances.

    First of all I get what your saying, but don’t be shocked to hear in a resistance conversation that the resistant does not trust a new society member.

    However what you say here is absolutely true, especially: “I think you will agree that there is enough verifiable evidence to support the need for some serious clarification and reassurances.”

    A trick of the ʝʊdɛօmasons is to memory hole literally everything and provide absolute silence until everyone especially in this modern age with a memory of goldfish forget. Well I can assure you I will not forget, this needs light and constant investigation until this is settled, publicly as it is a public scandal, and children are at risk.


    Offline bloomington

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 2
    • Reputation: +1/-0
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Man arrested for email
    « Reply #242 on: September 06, 2025, 01:30:00 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Chill Matthew, not everything is a conspiracy. "Broadstairs" refers to "17 West Cliff Road, Broadstairs", the house where Bp. Williamson lived until his death: https://fsspxranglia.wordpress.com/broadstairs/ As far as I know, only Fr. Abraham is residing in the house (he lived with Bp. Williamson, to my knowledge).

    I emailed the "Secretary of Bp. Williamson" (letters@eleisoncomments.com / E.C.correspondence@protonmail.com), who took over Bp. Williamsons E-Mail account after his death. He said, he knows about all Resistance Mass locations in the UK, but didn't want to give out any information for fear of persecution by journalists. Whether that's the real reason, I don't know.

    I could reveal his name (the one I got per E-Mail, could be fake), but it doesn't add anything to the situation. It would just be impolite, just as I wouldn't want anyone to associate my name online with any scandal. I still value the privacy of people as long as there isn't any active danger. "Name and shame" does nothing here.

    Even Bp. Williamsons grave location had to be kept secret so that Antifa wouldn't desecrate it. We don't live in America here in Europe, we don't have as much freedom as you do. I'm not sure if Americans get the message: here, you cannot just go around posting peoples names online without there being potential consequences. In America, everything is public on Twitter and nobody cares about privacy. This thread had 1000s of people watching when the scandal happened, remember? There are crazy / leftist people out there. So that's why I said "Broadstairs" instead of "Mr. XY", I refrain from posting peoples names online unless there's a serious reason, in order to protect their physical security and good name.

    I haven't heard from him anymore. My current plan is to bring up the issue again with Bp. Stobnicki end of this month and discuss what to do. I don't want to let this massive problem "slide", but I also don't want to unnecessarily attack people by name online - because if it ever turns out that Bp. Morgan is innocent, then it would have been very impolite to unnecessarily cause problems. Not everything needs to be online. I already have scruples if I accidentally reveal a sin of someone if it wasn't 100% necessary to reveal it.

    So are you doing in more investigating, will you be posting to ur website?

    Offline BaldwinIV

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 30
    • Reputation: +34/-11
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Man arrested for email
    « Reply #243 on: September 06, 2025, 03:09:39 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • So are you doing in more investigating, will you be posting to ur website?
    I'll see how it goes and post the result here.

    Offline Observer

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 3
    • Reputation: +0/-0
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Man arrested for email
    « Reply #244 on: September 07, 2025, 11:57:22 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I'll see how it goes and post the result here.

    brilliant, thank you


    Offline BaldwinIV

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 30
    • Reputation: +34/-11
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Man arrested for email
    « Reply #245 on: September 22, 2025, 03:36:14 PM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • Okay, I did tell him to nudge Bp. Morgan if he sees him, but only before Mass in the confessional, so he may accidentally be bound by the confessional seal. Here's a short recap / timeline of what happened (for Bp. Stobnicki):

    - A YouTube personality, Brendan Kavanaugh and his wife have a private Catholic chapel on their property where they have a monthly TLM
    - Brendan has about 2.6 MILLION subscribers on YouTube
    - Brendan had good connections to Bishop Williamson, as evidenced by this photograph in 2015 (?):



    - In early 2025 they were recommended a priest by a Catholic family, endorsed by Bishop Morgan
    - The priest in question ("Fr." Kerry Moran) had unusual demands for secrecy and wouldn't reveal basic information about his ordination
    - After the visit, Brendan became suspicious due to red flags, he sent a reference to the Catholic archdiocese in Martinique (Novus Ordo), where the priest had previously worked
    - Three weeks later, he received an official email stating the priest had been defrocked due to child abuse and should not be operating as a priest

    - Brendan forwarded this official docuмent to Bishop Morgan, who had recommended Fr. Moran
    • - Instead of investigating, Bishop Morgan blocked him.

      So that was the initial problem. After that, Kavanaugh uploaded his first video to the channel of a friend, Robert Nugent. This video is now deleted, but the remains are on the German Wikipedia page:

      Quote
      In a video posted in spring 2025, Irish-Canadian Catholic YouTuber Robert Nugent quoted two letters about a priest who had been ordained as a deacon in Fort-de-France on August 26, 2017, and had lost his clerical status on February 6, 2024, after being found guilty of child abuse.

      According to Nugent, one letter came from Abbé Benoît Paul-Joseph in Fort-de-France and confirmed the outcome of the investigation and the verdict, while the other came from Carlo Maria Viganò, who stated that this man was extremely deceitful, that contact with him should be avoided, and that he should under no circuмstances have contact with children and young people. Ballini had been informed but had unfortunately taken no action.

      Two days later, YouTuber Brendan Kavanagh contacted Nugent's channel and explained that this “dodgy priest” had celebrated Mass in his private chapel in the UK, but had behaved so strangely during the visit to his property that he had inquired in Martinique and learned that the man was no longer a clergyman for the reasons mentioned above.

      He had obtained the man's phone number from the SSPX Resistance and hired him “on good faith.” He forwarded the response from Martinique to Bishop Paul Morgan. Morgan, who according to Kavanagh had vouched for the man, also responded to the statement from Martinique with silence. The former priest himself claims that he is the victim of a conspiracy and that the archbishop of Martinique personally pressured children to make false statements against him.
      So, Viganò already found these issues credible and said, we should not associate with him. At this point, I already wrote to Broadstairs, this was on the 20th of May this year:

      Quote
      [...] What I will remark is that the British group really needs to clear up the „dodgy priest“ allegations, because the German Wikipedia page now slanders the Resistance as hiding pedos. [...] Now I say: it was reported to the police, the police didn’t find anything so far, so a simple statement by +Morgan „the priest hasn’t been officially convicted, so we still work with him“ would be enough [...]. If you could forward this to +Morgan, that’d be great. [...]
      The response came back the same day:


      Quote
      [...] I must say the 'dodgy priests' allegations are complete nonsense. In fact with the recent claims, the couple who started the rumours a few months ago were arrested by the Police and charged with criminal harassment. Clearly the Police believed the allegations were nonsense. As BpW often said the Church ways are different from the ways of the world and so statements are not put out against these defamations and lies. The Church has never operated like that. All the so-called resistants know the truth. 

    - Broadstairs knew that there were arrests going on, even back in May.
    - The suspicious part is that they alleged to the arrest as a form of "proven guilty"
    - I didn't know that "the couple who started the rumors" referred to Kavanaugh and his wife

    So I thought the issue was done.

    But then, on the 25th of June, the video at the beginning of this thread was posted, in which Kavanaugh explains that he had been arrested by the police for "harrassment" because of the e-mails that he sent to Bishop Morgan. At face value, this is clearly extremely weird. So on the 27th of June, I wrote another e-mail, since I remembered that the Broadstairs group knew about the situation. The entire text is here, but it's very friendly in tone.

    I only asked for a clarification on the situation, because in the meantime the scandal reached more than 100.000+ views on YouTube (the arrest video had more than ONE MILLION VIEWS). I did not receive any response so far, nor does anyone know anything about the scandal.
    • So far, the only apparent "defense" of Fr. Moran was posted here, claiming that there is evidence that the allegations of the diocese are made up. However, this is only an anonymous post here, not backed up by any evidence and does not explain the silence of Bp. Morgan, Bp. Ballini or Broadstairs. The priest (? - he was merely a deacon in the Novus Ordo seminary?) is still running around, somehow "connected" to the Resistance in Ireland and the UK, which has caused such a scandal that some people have gone back to the neo-SSPX.

      For Bp. Stobnicki: Please ask Bp. Morgan what on earth is going on, who ordained this guy and why, if there is any counter-evidence to the diocesan claims and why we are associating with this guy against the warnings of Abp. Viganò.

    Offline Fortitude

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 98
    • Reputation: +35/-28
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Man arrested for email
    « Reply #246 on: September 22, 2025, 04:08:24 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0

    • For Bp. Stobnicki: Please ask Bp. Morgan what on earth is going on, who ordained this guy and why, if there is any counter-evidence to the diocesan claims and why we are associating with this guy against the warnings of Abp. Viganò.[/li][/list]

      Thank you for your investigation updates.

      With regards to the quote above, are you asking someone to ask Bishop Stobnicki or are you asking him and awaiting his reply?

      Thanks.

      Offline BaldwinIV

      • Newbie
      • *
      • Posts: 30
      • Reputation: +34/-11
      • Gender: Male
      Re: Man arrested for email
      « Reply #247 on: Yesterday at 02:50:50 AM »
    • Thanks!0
    • No Thanks!0
    • With regards to the quote above, are you asking someone to ask Bishop Stobnicki or are you asking him and awaiting his reply?
      I did send this thread to him on WhatsApp, so at least he's notified. He does travel a lot in Poland so I'm not surprised if nothing happens for now (it's not like the bishops meet every day and these discussions are better done in person than over text). On Sunday evening I forgot to discuss it, we mostly discussed a bit over the "Fr. Hewko question", his position on the papacy and some related issues. I will meet, God willing, Bp. Zendejas at the end of October for my confirmation, so I can ask him, too, if he knows anything (doubt it because it's more a European issue).


      Offline Justinian

      • Newbie
      • *
      • Posts: 6
      • Reputation: +10/-5
      • Gender: Female
      Re: Man arrested for email
      « Reply #248 on: Yesterday at 06:47:13 AM »
    • Thanks!0
    • No Thanks!0
    • Is this priest still saying Mass for the SSPX resistance?

      Offline Seraphina

      • Hero Member
      • *****
      • Posts: 4401
      • Reputation: +3358/-350
      • Gender: Female
      Re: Man arrested for email
      « Reply #249 on: Yesterday at 11:57:44 AM »
    • Thanks!0
    • No Thanks!0
    • Such a mess! As a laywoman, I have no trust in myself to untangle it, therefore, if presented with the choice of Mass with a doubtful priest or home alone, I opt for home alone. 

      Offline Fortitude

      • Newbie
      • *
      • Posts: 98
      • Reputation: +35/-28
      • Gender: Male
      Re: Man arrested for email
      « Reply #250 on: Yesterday at 05:25:13 PM »
    • Thanks!1
    • No Thanks!0
    • I did send this thread to him on WhatsApp, so at least he's notified. He does travel a lot in Poland so I'm not surprised if nothing happens for now (it's not like the bishops meet every day and these discussions are better done in person than over text). On Sunday evening I forgot to discuss it, we mostly discussed a bit over the "Fr. Hewko question", his position on the papacy and some related issues. I will meet, God willing, Bp. Zendejas at the end of October for my confirmation, so I can ask him, too, if he knows anything (doubt it because it's more a European issue).

      Sadly I don’t think we will find the clarity we are looking for, nor will we hear the condemnation this scandal deserves it seems, we can only pray and continue to press for the truth.