I think he's looking for answers. What's going on? Why did Bishop Morgan recommend this priest? When he wrote the e-mail complaining about the priest, Bishop Morgan then blocked him? I think there's a question of trust here, where Bishop Morgan needs to be transparent about the entire thing.
I agree we need lots of clarity from all involved. We don't even know if the whole story is true, to begin with.
Let's try to take a step back: Now we have accusations against an un-named Priest (Fr. Fake), by an un-named guy who has shades glued to his face even at church, and whose goal in life seems to be filmed and posted. Look at him with the joined hands and shades in church. It looks completely staged. Who really prays like that and is being filmed like that?
We don't even know if he is a faithful of the Resistance. I mean, look at the video of the arrest: His wife is in leggings, and his daughters in pants. That reminds me more of Indult or Neo-SSPX faithful.
Is the whole operation a publicity stunt? Was there a more serious reason for the complaint lodged against him? Was the arrest really linked to Fr. Fake? Or was the arrest made for other reasons? If we knew the name of Mr. Shades, and the location of the police station where he was taken, we could get information from the police about the reasons for the arrest.
I think that if you are going to throw bombshell videos, you should make sure you come up with all details, so as to avoid confusion.
Look at all the replies to this topic They all come with questions and suppositions. We want names, locations, dates, etc. We want a DOSSIER, not a click-bait video by a guy with shades.
And this topic was posted by a guy who created his profile today, just to post his bombshell. He doesn't speak English, he throws a stinking bomb on the platform, with no real details or proof, and a lot of questions and suppositions. The one who should have posted is the main character, the Shades Video Guy.
I am sick of the whole thing.