brendan friend robert nugent on youtube is decrevi he do video on this also archbishop vigano did warm bishops in an email

link?

I think it should perhaps now be custom that any priest with a credible accusation of abuse is forever suspended from saying mass publicly or can only do so alone. Otherwise, he can spend time in penance in a monastery. Zero, absolutely zero, second chances. One is a priest forever, but can not do what a good priest is otherwise entitled to do. 

OP's syntax seems a little odd for a non-native English speaker...almost like a native English speaker trying to appear foreign

Back to the topic, that guy has 2.5 million subs and the arrest video has 80k views in 5 hours. Not a good look for  +Ballini and +Morgan if this is true, they shouldn't be having anything to do with priests like this. Repented, reformed or not it's just terrible optics

OP's syntax seems a little odd for a non-native English speaker...almost like a native English speaker trying to appear foreign

Back to the topic, that guy has 2.5 million subs and the arrest video has 80k views in 5 hours. Not a good look for  +Ballini and +Morgan if this is true, they shouldn't be having anything to do with priests like this. Repented, reformed or not it's just terrible optics

Si tú puedes escribir español… entonces ¿por qué el Obispo Morgan no dice nada de esto?

¿Por qué él recomendó a este padre?

If I meet a "priest" and he will not even tell me who ordained him, he is not even stepping foot on my driveway.  

This is one of the perils of having "isolated pockets of resistance" where there is no coordination or background details whatsoever about who's who. The irony of this is that Dr K had to contact another archdiocese to get information and was responded cordially with the required details.

Well, if Bishop Morgan is involved, that's a shame.  You'd think he would know (from +Williamson) to stay away from ANY cleric who has spent time with Fr Pfeiffer. 

Well, unfortunately, Bishop Williamson didn't always exercise great judgment in this department, as at one point he was hosting a priest who labored under credible allegations of predatory behavior ... after also having defended Urrutigoity tooth-and-nail.

I think he's looking for answers.  What's going on?  Why did Bishop Morgan recommend this priest?  When he wrote the e-mail complaining about the priest, Bishop Morgan then blocked him?  I think there's a question of trust here, where Bishop Morgan needs to be transparent about the entire thing.

From this link posted earlier https://www.pressreader.com/ireland/belfast-telegraph/20250415/281556591665695 it seems the predator was ordained deacon at the diocese of Fort-de-france (Martinique) and dismissed from the clerical state thereafter. From there, he moved to London, Cardiff, and now seems to be operating around Wales and Derry (Ireland). Thus he was never a priest in the first place. If he is presenting himself as a priest now, I would suspect this was because he was ordained by +Ballini, thus +Morgan could have relied on this information from +Ballini make the recommendation to Dr K? What a sad state of affairs that would be. I believe it would best for Dr K to reveal the details received from the diocese of Fort-de-france to clear this once and for all.