Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Man arrested for email  (Read 173135 times)

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Ladislaus

  • Supporter
Re: Man arrested for email
« Reply #495 on: January 13, 2026, 12:06:56 PM »
When Bp. Morgan / Bp. Ballini got notified of the situation, their reaction was roughly „all Internet talk is evil“ and ignored it and hoped it would pass ...

This is incredibly suspicious in its own right ... just "ignore it".  Not ... let's investigate?

... almost as bad as +?Pfeiffer simply taking the other Moran's "word for it" without any real investigation.

Sadly, these men are not any more qualified to be bishops than +?Pfeiffer was.

Offline Ladislaus

  • Supporter
Re: Man arrested for email
« Reply #496 on: January 13, 2026, 12:11:14 PM »
So, with that cleared, I've added Broadstairs back as a Mass location on dubia.cc as a theologically and physically safe location.

You have to be kidding me.  You yourself admit a ton of unanswered questions, where you'd have no idea why the diocese in which Fr. Moran had allegedly been molested would hound him all over the world, to the very ends of the earth, trying to persecute him, when he didn't even press charges and report the crimes to authorities.  So they first reported him to another Novus Ordo Diocese and then even proceeded to worm-tongue +Vigano to condemn him.  That's a lot of effort for someone who didn't even report them or press charges.

This stinks so badly of bovine excrement, that I find it deeply disturbing that you consider the situation "cleared".  What you posted here makes it orders of magnitude MORE suspicious that this was the best narrative Fr. Moran could come up with.


Re: Man arrested for email
« Reply #497 on: January 13, 2026, 12:28:20 PM »
Ladislaus, I respect you and all, but:

- The source I talked to has spoken to Fr. Moran personally and said there was nothing weird about him. I prefer people with personal contact over online anonymous allegations. Kavanaugh doesn't strike me that he understands what the Resistance is even about, so that lines up with what my source told me.

- I have seen ZERO actual evidence of guilt, zero docuмents, zero court cases, no police charges, nothing. Just a bunch of rumors that "he did something" by the diocese of Cardiff and the bishop of Martinique. 

I can of course try and verify it from another source, but for now I'd rather believe someone who I know was in contact with him, rather than what anonymous Americans are posting online. That the Resistance bishops didn't step up to defend them, is their problem, but it's not out of the ordinary for boomer priests. I don't assume malice if I can see incompetence.

As for Fr. Abraham: It was ruled this way by Fr. Pivert and I know Fr. Pivert personally, he is one of the oldest Resistance members, and he was a canon lawyer in the SSPX before that. So I take his opinion over yours, Lads.

I, again, have to uphold the principle: innocent until PROVEN guilty. There were SSPX priests who were rumored to have done something, only to eventually end up being innocent but then have a tarnished reputation. In fact, there were multiple of such cases with people trying to tarnish the image of the old-SSPX. There is zero proof here, so I can't just jump to "it's all BS" just because some Americans want to have their story.

Provide your proof that he's guilty and we can talk. Otherwise, kindly shut up.

Re: Man arrested for email
« Reply #498 on: January 13, 2026, 06:09:15 PM »
  :incense: +Bp. Williamson was right. 


Re: Man arrested for email
« Reply #499 on: January 14, 2026, 04:12:17 AM »
  :incense: +Bp. Williamson was right.


What is this about please? I can’t access it in UK