Must he ask permission of his local Novus Ordo bishop to be conditionally ordained by a Resistance bishop? How do you think that would go?

Like I said, at this point he is probably more concerned with clearing his name than being reinstated to any position in the Vatican II sect

How do we know the faithful that this actually concerns have not been made aware of this matter? Do you go to a Resistance mass? Has anyone here been to one of Moran's masses? I've heard some Resistance mass centers in the UK/Ireland are pretty hush hush, close knit, even before the Moran affair. Probably for good reason. They'll keep receiving the sacraments, while you, the Hewkonians, Pfiefferites, Indulters, and Novus Ordoites who have brigaded this forum can keep yapping

Ok, let us sum up exactly what you believe:

* You have NO regard for Canon Law. None.…

You really are a ninny.  You see ONE word and pounce without rhyme or reason. Christ was Hebrew. Old Testament was Hebrew. The Joos of today have no connection - neither religiously nor ethnically - to the Hebrews pre-Christ.…

Part Two:

"Yes, the Ordinary Magisterium is part of the deposit of faith, as it includes teachings that the Church proposes for belief based on Scripture and Tradition." AI answer.

The infallibility of both Solemn and Ordinary Magisterium was solemnly defined by the First Vatican Council (1870) when it stated the following:
"All those things are to be believed by divine and Catholic faith which are contained in the written Word of God or in Tradition, and which are proposed by the Church, either in Solemn judgement OR in its Ordinary and universal teaching office, as divinely revealed truths which must be believed."

The Catholic Encyclopedia (1917) in the article on Infallibility, states the same: "Three Organs of Infallibility: 1. the bishops dispersed throughout the world in union with the Holy See (exercised by what theologians describe as the ordinarium magisterium, i. e. the common or everyday teaching authority of the Church), 2. ecuмenical councils under the headship of the pope; and 3. the pope himself separately.

In other words, both forms of the Magisterium of the Church (Solemn or Ordinary) are to be treated as infallible and must be believed, according to this General Council. So if a teaching in the Church is universal, and allowed to propagate without condemnation from the Solemn Magisterium, it is considered infallible by the First Vatican Council.

The Solemn Magisterium:

The Council of Trent: Canons on the Sacraments in General: - (Canon 4):
“If anyone shall say that the sacraments of the New Law are not necessary for salvation, but are superfluous, and that although all are not necessary for every individual, without them or without the desire of them (sine eis aut eorum voto), through faith alone men obtain from God the grace of justification; let him be anathema."

The Council of Trent: Decree on Justification, Session VI, Chapter 4: …

In Hebrew thought, …

Quote“This use of the word Hebrew was used in order to show that the word 'righteousness' has always been, even in the OLD TESTAMENT, to mean 'holiness',”

QuoteThe Koliner rebbe [17th century rabbi of Prague] stated, “Our Zaddikim’s (famous Orthodox rabbis) words are more important than the Torah of Moses As our Sages teach: A Zaddik decrees, and God obeys.”

“God smiled and said: ‘My sons have defeated Me, My sons have defeated Me!’ God’s sons ‘defeated him’ with their arguments. Rabbi Yehoshua was correct in his contention that a view confirmed by majority vote must be accepted, even where God Himself holds the opposite view.”
Babylonian тαℓмυd, Tractate Bava Metzia 59b, Steinsaltz Edition [NY: Random House 1990], Vol. III p.237

“... The rabbi constituted the projection of the divine on earth. Honor was due him more than to the scroll of the Torah, for through his learning and logic he might alter the very content of Mosaic revelation. He was Torah, not merely because he lived by it, but because at his best he constituted as compelling an embodiment of the heavenly model as did a Torah scroll itself.”
Rabbi Jacob Neusner, “The Phenomenon of the Rabbi in Late Antiquity: II The Ritual of ‘Being a Rabbi’ in Later Sasanian Babylonia,” Numen, Vol.17, Fasc. 1., Feb., 1970, pp.3-4

No, there is no evidence in Catholic theology that the word "Hebrew" is considered a synonym, metaphor, or simile for "righteousness."

The term "Hebrew" (from the Hebrew "Ivri") is typically interpreted in Catholic sources, such as the writings of St. Jerome and other Church Fathers, as an ethnic designation derived from Abraham's ancestor Eber (Genesis 10:21, 11:14-17) or as meaning "one who crosses over" or "passer-by" (from the root 'abar, referring to Abraham's migration across the Euphrates River from Ur to Canaan). This "crossing over" is sometimes symbolically linked to Abraham's faith journey away from idolatry toward God, as seen in patristic commentaries on Genesis 14:13. Abraham himself is a model of righteousness by faith in Catholic teaching (e.g., Romans 4, cited in the Catechism of the Catholic Church, paras. 144-147), but the word "Hebrew" itself is not used as a direct stand-in for "righteousness."

The Hebrew word for "righteousness" is instead "tsedeq" or "tzedakah," which denotes justice, moral uprightness, or covenant fidelity, and is unrelated etymologically or theologically to "Hebrew" in Catholic tradition. Any symbolic connection between Abraham's "Hebrew" identity and righteousness stems from Jєωιѕн midrashic interpretations (e.g., Abraham standing alone against the world for God), which Catholic theology may acknowledge in broader biblical exegesis but does not adopt as a direct equivalence for the term.

Yes, the Hebrew term **צַדִּיק** (transliterated as *tzaddik* or *tsaddik*) is used in Jєωιѕн tradition, including тαℓмυdic literature, as a term of reverence to refer to exceptionally righteous individuals, sages, or respected rabbis. The word derives from the root **צ-ד-ק** (*ts-d-q*), meaning "righteousness" or "justice," and denotes someone who embodies moral and spiritual uprightness.

In тαℓмυdic and later Jєωιѕн tradition, a *tzaddik* is not merely a "righteous person" in a general sense but often carries a specific connotation of holiness, wisdom, and closeness to God. The term is applied to figures such as revered rabbis, sages, or spiritual leaders who exemplify piety and adherence to Torah. For example:
- In the тαℓмυd, figures like Rabbi Akiva or Hillel are implicitly regarded as *tzaddikim* due to their exemplary lives and teachings, though the term is not always explicitly applied to every sage.
- In later Jєωιѕн mysticism, particularly in Hasidism, the *tzaddik* became a central figure, often referring to a rebbe (spiritual leader) believed to have a unique connection to God, capable of interceding for their followers. The Hasidic concept of the *tzaddik* builds on earlier тαℓмυdic reverence but elevates it with mystical significance.

The related term **צְדָקָה** (*tzedakah*), also from the same root, refers to acts of charity or righteousness but is distinct from *tzaddik*, which describes a person. In Catholic theology, as noted previously, *tzaddik* or *tsedeq* is understood as "righteousness" in biblical contexts (e.g., in the Hebrew Scriptures), but the specific Jєωιѕн usage as a title for revered sages or rabbis is not paralleled in Catholic tradition, which has its own categories like "saint" or "doctor of the Church" for venerated figures.

....................
So perhaps we could be forgiving towards +Morgan on some of these rumors, errors and presumptions, no?

My initial gut feeling was how could a bishop show up at a police station? for some emails?
That said, lets wait and see what else transpires...there are surely some mysteries to be unraveled.
I appreciate your investigations.

That's what I hope: clarity / charity!

DrK is confusing the events, as in what happened first, then this etc. In his videos he repeats the " We forgot all about it.." I have not yet seen the date when Fr Moran was saying mass, only an indirect clue from the Sept 8., 2024 Video. The curious thing is he never mentions a precise date. Odd.

Have you, Boru, Justinian, Gareth Weaver et al contacted ++Vigano, +Morgan, or +Ballini directly yourselves asking these questions?  I'm confused as to why you would post here rather than reach out to the parties themselves.  Why post here asking CathInfo to contact the bishops rather than do it yourselves?  Have you contacted Fr Moran? 

Those are good questions. Morgan is completely silent and refuses to comment as Mr Weaver proved. Ballini also. Vigano has provided his response and warnings by email but some on this forum choose not to believe it is genuinely from him.

I understand investigations are underway and the full truth will be revealed in due course, and doubtless be posted on this forum. Sunlight is the best disinfectant.

A principal verdict has to come from Rome at this point , and then other relevant issues will be hammered out.  I am referring to the case re: the Appeal about bishop of Martinique defrocking our "Deacon". The REBUTTAL highlights this course of action, as :
"...
8. On-going Recourse Before the Holy See

The matter is currently subject to on-going recourse before the Holy See because my client was NOT in Martinique when the allegations made against him were FABRICATED by Archbishop Macaire..."

******
Plus , DrK is launching a civil court case against the police as per his Update video , August 11, 2025.

So few channels to research.