As I have stated several times, I do not lie. My husband and myself did indeed have dinner with Fr. Morgan, Bishop Williamson and Fr. Abraham. We know - or rather knew Fr. Morgan quite well - he was a regular visitor to Ireland - participated in the book club we had going here - and we had him over to dinner in our family home. He also oversaw St. Michael's school where our son attended. He has a lovely winsome charm about him and is the perfect host.
As for Fr. Abraham - yes, it is quite easy to see the character of some people upon one afternoon of mixing. Fr. Abraham is a simple soul who does not have the capacity to hold his ground under a line of questioning. I know this as a verifiable fact through a ex-resistance friend who questioned him about another issue. Fr. Abraham is an open book.
With regards to the so-called 6 page letter from "Kershaw" - if you read it, it opens with a warning that Moran had arranged a meeting with "Mr. Paul Sanford, Chief Constable of Norfolk police, a police force located in the jurisdiction of England and Wales" on October 18th, 2025. Through an ex-cop friend who now works in the child safety department, Weaver established that no such meeting was arranged or took place.
As for the rest of the letter - it is almost word for word - what the character 'truthy' wrote here on Cathinfo.
I do not like Mr. Weaver's wholesale attacks upon the SSPX however I concede that Mr. Weaver has a point; there have been a lot of cover ups that the SSPX should be held accountable for; Fr. Rostand immediately comes to mind. The same should be said of the Resistance. If there are possible child abusers within your midst, they need to be rooted out. It is not an attack on your beliefs - its a justifiable attack on the SSPX/Resistance lack of proper child safety protocol. This has to be addressed - openly and with great clarity. It's in all our interests.
If Mr. Moran was truly innocent, he would have quietly waited for the canonical process of appeal (if there is one) to reach its conclusion. But he did not. He deceived Archbishop Vigano into ordaining him - a mere two or three months after his laicisation - and then, without any proper training, went onto the Resistance Mass circuit keeping his identity a secret. When found out, and confronted, he went into immediate attack mode - lodging complaints to the local police force claiming harassment, and sending false 'lawyer's' letters claiming the same.
Again, honest people on Cathinfo, look carefully at what the sockpuppet says, proving that she is not just some "mum" from Ireland who attends the SSPX. She is an insider, hiding her identity to smear the reputations of certain people who threaten her own organization because they know the truth about that organization.
Boru says above,
If Mr. Moran was truly innocent, he would have quietly waited for the canonical process of appeal (if there is one) to reach its conclusion. But he did not. He deceived Archbishop Vigano into ordaining him - a mere two or three months after his laicisation - and then, without any proper training, went onto the Resistance Mass circuit keeping his identity a secret.
How does the busy "SSPX-attending" homeschool mom from Ireland have all the details about the precise type of "deception" Moran participated in with Vigano? Vigano did not specify what the "deception" was in his purported email about Moran to Dr. K.
How would she know that the "deception" was related to Moran's ordination and not to something else?
How would she know the timing of Moran's ordination--"a mere two or three months after his laicization." In her very
first post back on July 5, 2025, Boru said the following:
This of course brings into question the validly of his alleged ordination, especially as he was laicised only last year (June 2024) and yet presented himself as an ordained pries less than a year later. Again, I use the word alleged, because it is shrouded in secrecy; no one knows who ordained him, when he was ordained, or whether he is simply claiming to be ordained. Perhaps, and I am speculating, this is what His Grace Archbishop Vigano was alluding to when he said himself and His Lordship Bishop Williamson had been deceived.
Please note the bolded part in the above quote. Liars are notorious for contradicting themselves. In July, Boru wasn't even sure if Vigano had ordained Moran. Now, in October (with no new information about Moran's Ordination details being made public), Boru is certain that Moran "deceived" Vigano into ordaining him, and she claims to know the date of that ordination!
Ask yourself who would know the date of Moran's purported ordination by Vigano? Who would know that that purported ordination was "a mere two or three months after his [Moran's] laicization?"
The answer is only someone with inside information of this whole affair would know. A SSPX homeschool mom with dogs and horses who lives in Ireland and knew Fr. Morgan many years ago would not know these things.
This person, Boru, is not who she says she is. Don't fall for her lies.
And Boru. You are maliciously trying to ruin the reputation of a priest. You are spreading gossip and lies. Do you think that is allowed according to Catholic moral theology? For the sake of your soul, heed the words of Apocalypse 21:
8 But the fearful, and unbelieving, and the abominable, and murderers, and whoremongers, and sorcerers, and idolaters,
and all liars, they shall have their portion in the pool burning with fire and brimstone, which is the second death. 
Topic: Man arrested for email (Read 174096 times)