Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Man arrested for email  (Read 40525 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline TheRealMcCoy

  • Supporter
  • ***
  • Posts: 1474
  • Reputation: +1105/-231
  • Gender: Female
  • The Thread Killer
Re: Man arrested for email
« Reply #375 on: October 09, 2025, 09:36:58 AM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  •  So please, may we stop this hostility - at least on this thread - and pull together to find out where this Moran is and why Bp. Morgan is hiding/defending him.
     
    I haven’t followed these threads closely, so perhaps I’ve missed a detail but I’m rather perplexed. If +Morgan isn’t speaking to anyone, how is it publicly known that he’s hiding or defending Moran? Those two positions don’t quite reconcile.

    Offline maxkolbe

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 34
    • Reputation: +19/-28
    Re: Man arrested for email
    « Reply #376 on: October 09, 2025, 09:44:32 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!2

  • I haven’t followed these threads closely, so perhaps I’ve missed a detail but I’m rather perplexed. If +Morgan isn’t speaking to anyone, how is it publicly known that he’s hiding or defending Moran? Those two positions don’t quite reconcile.
    Defending with silence.


    Offline TheRealMcCoy

    • Supporter
    • ***
    • Posts: 1474
    • Reputation: +1105/-231
    • Gender: Female
    • The Thread Killer
    Re: Man arrested for email
    « Reply #377 on: October 09, 2025, 09:46:57 AM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • Defending with silence.
    Silence is not defense.  It is discernment.

    Offline Angelus

    • Supporter
    • ***
    • Posts: 1307
    • Reputation: +593/-112
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Man arrested for email
    « Reply #378 on: October 09, 2025, 09:51:22 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Angelus, I have clarified myself many times. I have responded to numerous people privately as well - openly and honestly. I never lie, its cowardly.

    The problem is not me, it's you. You only see what you want to see. For some reason you feel so threatened by a different point of view that you are going into overdrive. A forum is for discussing and debating and exchanging news. This can be done politely and with mutual respect. I have no agenda other than to discuss, debate and exchange news - and learn as I go.

    Now this particular thread is about a serious issue that concerns us all. Yes, I go to a SSPX chapel but I have Resistance friends and I want the message to get out far and wide that there has been/is an officially laicized man - laicized for for child abuse - who is passing himself off as a priest in good standing. Enough evidence has been submitted to prove that this is indeed happening and that the faithful need to be on their guard, ask questions and have the situation clarified by Bp Morgan and Bp. Ballini who were responsible for having this man on the Irish and English circuit without any warning about his background. In anyone's book this was a highly negligent and irresponsible thing to do.

    Moran refused to give Mr. and Mrs. Kavanagh his name or any other personal details. They accepted him purely because he was recommended by Bp. Morgan. This shows us that this Moran fellow could turn up anywhere on the Resistance radar - even America. It also shows that Bp. Morgan and Bp. Ballini are not being open and truthful and this too should be a great concern.

    I did not start this thread. Naturally, I assumed there were many UK/Irish posters who were worried about this man. Naturally I assumed all posters WERE worried about this man. The Resistance circle is very small and very dependent on the priests they are given to offer the sacraments. This makes the danger all the greater.  I assure you my husband and myself have been VERY vocal about the cover-ups within the SSPX clergy. We are certainly not Bishop Fellay's favourite people. So please, may we stop this hostility - at least on this thread - and pull together to find out where this Moran is and why Bp. Morgan is hiding/defending him.

    Admit that you don't currently reside in Ireland. Admit that you are on the forum to stir up trouble. Then I will let it go.

    Your very first post on the forum is below:

    Quote
    https://www.pressreader.com/ireland/belfast-telegraph/20250415/281556591665695

    The above article may answer a number questions raised here on this forum with regards to the back ground of Mr. Kerry Michael Moran ('Fr. Fake' as Dr. Kavanagh calls him). Respectfully I address him as Mr. given that he was officially laicized as a deacon and as far I understand, can only be canonically reinstated to the clerical state with a special dispensation from the Holy See. This of course brings into question the validly of his alleged ordination, especially as he was laicised only last year (June 2024) and yet presented himself as an ordained pries less than a year later. Again, I use the word alleged, because it is shrouded in secrecy; no one knows who ordained him, when he was ordained, or whether he is simply claiming to be ordained. Perhaps, and I am speculating, this is what His Grace Archbishop Vigano was alluding to when he said himself and His Lordship Bishop Williamson had been deceived. What is certain is that this Mr. Moran has a long recorded history of being moved from place to place due to inappropriate behavior with minors. And as a Ladislaus outlined earlier, an innocent man, who cared about the faithful, would never insert himself into the homes of young children until he name about been formerly cleared.



    Claim 1: Moran should be addressed as Mr. because he was laicized (as a deacon) by the perverts in the Vatican in 2024. You get this from a news report. You assume this and launch into your tirade.

    Claim 2: Moran's later ordination by a Resistance Bishop might not be valid because of the Vatican action. You provide no proof of that a laicization related to the Diaconate would prevent a man from later becoming an ordained Priest. You simply say that the perverts in the UnHoly See would need to reinstate him. Are we seeing a pattern here yet? Let me spell it out for you. You trust the perverts in the Vatican.

    Claim 3: Moran's situation is "shrouded in secrecy." Not really, it seems that you and the newspapers act as if they have all the information they need to condemn him. You have played judge and jury regarding him and the Resistance bishops. Another pattern revealed. You DO NOT trust the Resistance bishops.

    Claim 4: No one knows who ordained him. How do you know that? Maybe you don't know. But why would it even matter. No one is claiming it is any one other than one of the Resistance bishops, who are all validly consecrated bishops. Again, you don't trust the Resistance bishops. But you do trust the NuChurch bishops and the SSPX bishops.

    Claim 5: Where did Vigano "allude to" being deceived by Moran? Maybe he did. Show the evidence. You claim to trust Vigano. Of course Vigano was excommunicated by the same perverts in the Vatican that you trust. So you are a self-contradicting mess.

    Claim 6: Moran "moved from place to place due to inappropriate behavior with minors." Where is your proof that he moved because of that reason?

    Claim 7: You say "an innocent man would never insert himself into the home of young children." Whose home is he inserting himself into? But this even assumes that he is guilty of anything significant, which all you have to go on is speculation and innuendo based one the actions of pervert in the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith, Tucho's Vatican Kangaroo Court.

    See Boru. It is clear from your very first post that you have an agenda. That agenda is to destroy the reputations of the Resistance bishops by using the Moran scandal, created by the Youtube piano man, who also has an agenda.

    You are a plant and here to stir up trouble. You claim to be so concerned about Resistance faithful. What a farce. Are there so many cases of molestation going on in the tiny Resistance chapels? Is this a joke. Ah, but we know there certainly are MANY molestations happening the the Novus Ordo, and FSSP, and SSPX. Those are all over the news with confessions from the perpetrators and jail time. But what does Boru do? She (it?) focuses on the Resistance. Hmmm.


    Offline maxkolbe

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 34
    • Reputation: +19/-28
    Re: Man arrested for email
    « Reply #379 on: October 09, 2025, 09:52:23 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!1
  • Silence is not defense.  It is discernment.
    Wow. 

    Archbishop Vigano will clear this up. 


    Offline AnthonyPadua

    • Supporter
    • ****
    • Posts: 2567
    • Reputation: +1314/-284
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Man arrested for email
    « Reply #380 on: October 09, 2025, 09:53:25 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Defending with silence.
    My SSPX priest said that he was taught that if the priests are ever accused of such crimes they should remain silent and take it as coming from God.

    Offline maxkolbe

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 34
    • Reputation: +19/-28
    Re: Man arrested for email
    « Reply #381 on: October 09, 2025, 09:56:26 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!1
  • My SSPX priest said that he was taught that if the priests are ever accused of such crimes they should remain silent and take it as coming from God.
    Which explains Father Rostand etc.

    Offline Angelus

    • Supporter
    • ***
    • Posts: 1307
    • Reputation: +593/-112
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Man arrested for email
    « Reply #382 on: October 09, 2025, 10:13:17 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Which explains Father Rostand etc.

    Says the man who trusts the Vatican Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith to tell the truth.

    Rostand was tried in the civil courts and admitted to his horrors and is serving jail time. Yes, the SSPX bishops promoted him to District Superior in the USA before his arrest. That was not good.

    Moran, on the other hand, has not been reported by the Vatican to any civil authorities for whatever sins they claim he committed. Oh no, is the Vatican complicit in harboring a "child molester," as you claim him to be. Say it isn't so.

    This is much bigger than Moran, Mr. Kolbe. Go right now and warn all of the NuChurch followers that the Vatican is aiding and abetting child molestors. Um...wait we already know they do that. But, no worries. We trust the Vatican in all of their "convictions" and "laicisations."

    Let's just get back to destroying the reputations of the Resistance bishops, basing all of our claims on newspaper reports, innuendo, and Vatican pervert "convictions." Is that right, Kolbe? Is that what you are doing?


    Offline maxkolbe

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 34
    • Reputation: +19/-28
    Re: Man arrested for email
    « Reply #383 on: October 09, 2025, 10:17:00 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!2
  • Says the man who trusts the Vatican Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith to tell the truth.

    Rostand was tried in the civil courts and admitted to his horrors and is serving jail time. Yes, the SSPX bishops promoted him to District Superior in the USA before his arrest. That was not good.

    Moran, on the other hand, has not been reported by the Vatican to any civil authorities for whatever sins they claim he committed. Oh no, is the Vatican complicit in harboring a "child molester," as you claim him to be. Say it isn't so.

    This is much bigger than Moran, Mr. Kolbe. Go right now and warn all of the NuChurch followers that the Vatican is aiding and abetting child molestors. Um...wait we already know they do that. But, no worries. We trust the Vatican in all of their "convictions" and "laicisations."

    Let's just get back to destroying the reputations of the Resistance bishops, basing all of our claims on newspaper reports, innuendo, and Vatican pervert "convictions." Is that right, Kolbe? Is that what you are doing?
    Continues to bury head in sand.

    Offline Angelus

    • Supporter
    • ***
    • Posts: 1307
    • Reputation: +593/-112
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Man arrested for email
    « Reply #384 on: October 09, 2025, 10:20:00 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Continues to bury head in sand.

    Do you trust the teachings and canonical actions of the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith? Yes or no?

    Offline TheRealMcCoy

    • Supporter
    • ***
    • Posts: 1474
    • Reputation: +1105/-231
    • Gender: Female
    • The Thread Killer
    Re: Man arrested for email
    « Reply #385 on: October 09, 2025, 10:21:28 AM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • Wow.

    Archbishop Vigano will clear this up.
    Hmm...in the four or so emails I’ve received from him recently, I noticed no mention of this matter, only the customary appeals for donations. Are you suggesting he’s indicated an intention to address this issue publicly?


    Offline Twice dyed

    • Supporter
    • ***
    • Posts: 716
    • Reputation: +283/-28
    • Gender: Male
    • Violet, purple, and scarlet twice dyed. EX: 35, 6.
    Re: Man arrested for email
    « Reply #386 on: October 09, 2025, 10:26:23 AM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0



  • Angelus, I have clarified myself many times. I have responded to numerous people privately as well - openly and honestly. I never lie, its cowardly.


    Moran refused to give Mr. and Mrs. Kavanagh his name or any other personal details. They accepted him purely because he was recommended by Bp. Morgan. This shows us that this Moran fellow ..."
     https://www.cathinfo.com/sspx-resistance-news/man-arrested-for-email/msg990492/#msg990492

    I doubt that + Morgan recommended 'fr. ' Moran. In the OP video, June 24 Title:"Watch First: Context of the Arrest", 

    TimeStamp 0:47, DrK says:
    "...So we were recommended a priest by a good Catholic family ,  who had the support of a bishop who we have known for 15 years. ..."
    (+Williamson.?)
    Even on Sept 8, 2024 AD, "fr" Moran was already intoning the "Asperges me" in the Barn chapel of DrK.as per my previous post(X. com)

    The measure of love is to love without measure.
                                     St. Augustine (354 - 430 AD)

    Offline maxkolbe

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 34
    • Reputation: +19/-28
    Re: Man arrested for email
    « Reply #387 on: October 09, 2025, 10:27:00 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!1
  • Says the man who trusts the Vatican Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith to tell the truth.

    Rostand was tried in the civil courts and admitted to his horrors and is serving jail time. Yes, the SSPX bishops promoted him to District Superior in the USA before his arrest. That was not good.

    Moran, on the other hand, has not been reported by the Vatican to any civil authorities for whatever sins they claim he committed. Oh no, is the Vatican complicit in harboring a "child molester," as you claim him to be. Say it isn't so.

    This is much bigger than Moran, Mr. Kolbe. Go right now and warn all of the NuChurch followers that the Vatican is aiding and abetting child molestors. Um...wait we already know they do that. But, no worries. We trust the Vatican in all of their "convictions" and "laicisations."

    Let's just get back to destroying the reputations of the Resistance bishops, basing all of our claims on newspaper reports, innuendo, and Vatican pervert "convictions." Is that right, Kolbe? Is that what you are doing?
    to your last point, nope. I defended this scandal like you are doing, and then I looked into it, and realized I was defending the indefensible.

    Offline Angelus

    • Supporter
    • ***
    • Posts: 1307
    • Reputation: +593/-112
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Man arrested for email
    « Reply #388 on: October 09, 2025, 10:50:35 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • to your last point, nope. I defended this scandal like you are doing, and then I looked into it, and realized I was defending the indefensible.

    Well, are you holding something back from us? Please lay out the full evidence that convinced you.


    Offline maxkolbe

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 34
    • Reputation: +19/-28
    Re: Man arrested for email
    « Reply #389 on: October 09, 2025, 11:01:26 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!1
  • Well, are you holding something back from us? Please lay out the full evidence that convinced you.
    Go ahead and email/contact Bishop Ballini and Bishop Morgan yourself.