Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Man arrested for email  (Read 42209 times)

0 Members and 8 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Angelus

  • Supporter
  • ***
  • Posts: 1307
  • Reputation: +593/-112
  • Gender: Male
Re: Man arrested for email
« Reply #330 on: October 08, 2025, 01:10:24 PM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • Don't you think it would be healthier to direct your concern towards the Resistance bishops who put a child abuser on the Resistance circuit?

    My dog in this fight is not only my GOD-CHILD who was put at risk, but every other child who was put at risk and still could be put at risk. Many of these families are my friends. You seem to have no connection to this side of the world so it's perhaps hard for you to relate to, but nevertheless, it's to no advantage to anyone attacking those who do care and do have a connection. May I ask, is defending your corner more important to you than protecting children and families?

    And here is another example, just from today of Boru's true focus. It is "the Resistance bishops" as a group, who she says put "a child abuser" on the Resistance circuit. Again, her focus is not on Moran himself. But on the Resistance bishops.

    And of course she is all about "children and families." But she claims to attend the SSPX (probably false), whose own bishops have definitely "put a child abuser" or ten on the SSPX circuit over the years.

    And those "child abusers" in the SSPX have confessed their guilt in courts of law and served time in prison. One was the district superior in the USA about a decade ago. But Boru has never mentioned any outrage over such lack of "oversight" in the SSPX. Quite a double standard, eh?


    Offline Angelus

    • Supporter
    • ***
    • Posts: 1307
    • Reputation: +593/-112
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Man arrested for email
    « Reply #331 on: October 08, 2025, 01:29:25 PM »
  • Thanks!2
  • No Thanks!0
  • You are absolutely right.  There are failures everywhere.  If you were payng attention in your first Catechism class, this was probably mentioned.  In this case, we are discussing it because we know the people concerned.  If you don't know them, maybe it's of no interest to you (personally), but as the Christian faithful have usually supported their fellow Christian faithful - over 2000 years - what is NOT unusual is solidarity with those who have been hurt.  OK?  Argue with that, mate.
    You are a joke. Starting with your cute signature line and your profile avatar. It must have taken you quite a bit of time to come up with that persona. Did you plan to spend a lot of time on Cathinfo? Do you have anything in common with the people here? 

    But you just had to come online and re-ignite a thread that had died pretty much died down. You come in with a "personal" story as someone from the UK with connections to the Polish resistance in the UK. Then you gradually reveal that you live in Rome and don't attend Mass in the UK.

    Your deception is so transparent. Your closing words in your very FIRST post:

    Quote
    I reach out to my fellow Catholics in the Polish community who are involved in SSPX Resistance, and I feel your pain.  Yopu have been disgracefully served by your bishop and deserve an explanation.

    It is clear that the person at the centre of this horrible story was either ordained priest (after his Catholic dismissal) by +Morgan, or +Viganò, or +Ballini, so one of them needs to have the thuribles to own up!

    Be gone, Satan, the father of lies.



    Offline Angelus

    • Supporter
    • ***
    • Posts: 1307
    • Reputation: +593/-112
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Man arrested for email
    « Reply #332 on: October 08, 2025, 01:33:17 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • The constant trolling of people whose views some sect members dislike is very irritating, but more interesting is the failure to address the child safeguarding issues.  You are complicit in the safeguarding failure when you deride the people who take it seriously.

    My article on this whole dismal episode will appear on a Catholic website very soon.  www.wherepeteris.com

    I thank those members of SSPX Resistance here who have admitted there is a safeguarding problem.  The general atmosphere of the discussion earlier on the thread showed a responsibility I will credit in my article.  (The rages of the trolls are not very interesting and I won't mention them.  You get trolls everywhere!)

    My name is Gareth Thomas Weaver and everyrhing I have said about my own background in response to challenges was true.  I am an ex-traditional Catholic and these safeguarding failures are a disgrace.

    This guy is clearly a plant. Here is what he wrote about the false prophet, Bergoglio:


    Laudato Si’ finally won my heart and intellect to Pope Francis
    By Gareth Thomas Weaver
    As convert I have lived in the Catholic Church under three popes during three decades. I gave my unquestioning obedience to John Paul II and Benedict XVI; and then I regrettably spent the initial years of Pope Francis’s pontificate in rebellion, aligned with people who I took far too long to recognize were in radical error. I had brought with me from my Anglican faith a strong devotion to the mystical poverty of the saints of Assisi, so it was Laudato Si which finally won my heart and intellect to Pope Francis’s spiritual and temporal project. As a lifelong traveller on the roads to Compostela, about which I have written for WPI, I now understand my Catholic re-conversion under the shepherding of Pope Francis to be a pilgrimage. He was there on the road ahead of me a long while. I obstinately kept my distance, preferring the fun of walking with a bunch of people who didn’t care about the destination but enjoyed the banter on the road. Then gradually — out of curiosity perhaps — I struck out alone and drew nearer to him. Then I recognised in him all the signs of the true Shepherd and I walked alongside him with a sure step. Now his physical leadership has been taken from us, I guess the first lesson I have learned is to give my obedience to his successor from Day 1.



    Offline Angelus

    • Supporter
    • ***
    • Posts: 1307
    • Reputation: +593/-112
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Man arrested for email
    « Reply #333 on: October 08, 2025, 01:42:50 PM »
  • Thanks!2
  • No Thanks!0
  • Yes, I have gone thank you.  (See above.)  And the moderation here - by the way - is marginally as bad as the episcopal oversight!  Boom boom...

    Liar! In your first post, you posed as a "mainstream" Catholic who was "open to all expressions of the traditional Catholic faith." But you actually worship Bergoglio and his Laudato Si form of Counterfeit Catholicism. And you write articles for one of the most liberal, pro-false-Rome online rags: Wherepeteris.com

    You feigned concern for the UK "connections" of yours and especially Brendan Kavanauh. Who hired you for your infiltration efforts? Are you on the same payroll as Bore U?


    Quote
    I have a connection with the Polish Catholic community in Folkestone who attend the regular Polish Mass at Our Lady Help of Christians. I am also aware of an SSPX Resistance group of Polish Catholics in East Kent (centred in Broadstairs) and know some individuals.  All through my life since my father - God rest his Catholic soul - was in the RAF generation that saved England from the nαzιs I have appreciated the Polish RAF contribution in the turning point Battle of Britain in 1940.  Although I remain in the Catholic mainstream in the Southwark Archdiocese I am open to all expressions of traditional Catholic faith. My model is the Saxon Archbishop of Canterbury, Dunstan (d.988) and all in Kent know the legend of Dunstan grabbing the devil by the nose with his blacksmith's tongs in his forge!

    The horrifying incident that the Kavanagh family experienced (i.e. being sent a priest by +Morgan of SSPX Resistance - a priest who was verifiably laicised in Martinique when a deacon, as shown in the Chancellor's emails from that diocese) was further compounded by +Morgan's response: to have the couple arrested over alleged "angry emails" by a convoy of three police cars, and handcuffed in front of their children.  A civil complaint against the police has now been launched.  What has not been launched is +Morgan's explanation.  Why did he respond to a safeguarding alert by having the complainants arrested?

    Reading this thread, I am so heartened to read the responses of so many supporting Brendan Kavanagh (the arrested father of the family) who is now launching a civil action against the police.  When that action reaches the courts, the response of +Morgan to the family's correct safeguarding complaint will be the main focus, not the doctrinal niceties of this or that SSPX grouping, and the incense will hit the fan (to put it politely!)  The fact that +Morgan has made no public statement is disappointing.  I reach out to my fellow Catholics in the Polish community who are involved in SSPX Resistance, and I feel your pain.  Yopu have been disgracefully served by your bishop and deserve an explanation.

    It is clear that the person at the centre of this horrible story was either ordained priest (after his Catholic dismissal) by +Morgan, or +Viganò, or +Ballini, so one of them needs to have the thuribles to own up!


    Offline Pax Vobis

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 12740
    • Reputation: +8119/-2502
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Man arrested for email
    « Reply #334 on: October 08, 2025, 01:45:29 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • but more interesting is the failure to address the child safeguarding issues.  You are complicit in the safeguarding failure when you deride the people who take it seriously.
    1.  You 'beg the question' that there are issues.  Nothing has been proven.  An allegation isn't proof.
    2.  Innocent until proven guilty -- at least that's an American concept of justice.  Maybe in Britain it's guilty, then innocent?  Sure seems that's your view.


    Offline Angelus

    • Supporter
    • ***
    • Posts: 1307
    • Reputation: +593/-112
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Man arrested for email
    « Reply #335 on: October 08, 2025, 01:51:55 PM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • 1.  You 'beg the question' that there are issues.  Nothing has been proven.  An allegation isn't proof.
    2.  Innocent until proven guilty -- at least that's an American concept of justice.  Maybe in Britain it's guilty, then innocent?  Sure seems that's your view.

    Pax, to get an idea of who you are really talking to, see his writings:

    https://wherepeteris.com/author/gareth-thomas-weaver/

    https://equusasinus.net

    Offline Godefroy

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 758
    • Reputation: +885/-73
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Man arrested for email
    « Reply #336 on: October 08, 2025, 02:02:16 PM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!2
  • 1.  You 'beg the question' that there are issues.  Nothing has been proven.  An allegation isn't proof.
    2.  Innocent until proven guilty -- at least that's an American concept of justice.  Maybe in Britain it's guilty, then innocent?  Sure seems that's your view.
    An allegation against a priest that's saying a public mass, is enough to warrant him being removed from the circuit, whilst investigations are ongoing. Yet there is no evidence of any investigation. 

    Why is that so difficult to understand? 

    Would you hire an alleged alcoholic to work in your bar? Of course not.  

    Especially in trad circles where silence, cover ups, payoffs and transfers to new a chapel where no one knows the prior history, is the norm.


    Saint Peter Damian, Brandano da Petroio and Savonarola had no problem speaking publicly and forcefully about the sɛҳuąƖ sins of men of the Church. That's what we need right now as canon law isn't cutting it. 

    Offline Godefroy

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 758
    • Reputation: +885/-73
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Man arrested for email
    « Reply #337 on: October 08, 2025, 02:04:41 PM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!1
  • Pax, to get an idea of who you are really talking to, see his writings:

    https://wherepeteris.com/author/gareth-thomas-weaver/

    https://equusasinus.net
    Maybe one should question why a novos ordo Catholic is having to do the investigation that should have been done months ago in the Resistance. 


    Offline Twice dyed

    • Supporter
    • ***
    • Posts: 719
    • Reputation: +284/-28
    • Gender: Male
    • Violet, purple, and scarlet twice dyed. EX: 35, 6.
    Re: Man arrested for email
    « Reply #338 on: October 08, 2025, 02:13:32 PM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • Thank you, Twice dyed.  It's good that you take the trouble to welcome a newcomer, unlike some who are immediately suspicious that people take the trouble to join the discussion!  (But that's the usual rudeness of the internet. isn't it?) 

    P.S. Yes indeed Saint Dunstan pray for us.  He is patron of the blind and was a great & wise counsellor to three Saxon kings.  As Archbishop of Canterbury he was known for holiness and practising his trademark passion of working iron in a blacksmiths forge!
    Hospitality is the flower of Charity.
    Or: Actions speak louder than words. 
    So, what I learned yesterday ( from yesterday's post-) was that + Vigano cut himself off from the Resistance, basically another black eye for Trad Ilk  .
    Pray. 
    The measure of love is to love without measure.
                                     St. Augustine (354 - 430 AD)

    Offline Avis

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 61
    • Reputation: +51/-15
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Man arrested for email
    « Reply #339 on: October 08, 2025, 02:14:56 PM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!1
  • Will Gareth Weaver aka Dunstan's partner in crime, Boru now unmask him/herself? 

    How did Weaver even find out about all this? Who put him on to it? Boru or Piano Man ?  God will not be mocked and the truth will come out.

    Let us remember in our prayers all the combatants for the truth on here like Angelus who smoked out this wicked individual with a clear agenda.

    Offline Pax Vobis

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 12740
    • Reputation: +8119/-2502
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Man arrested for email
    « Reply #340 on: October 08, 2025, 02:32:58 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • An allegation against a priest that's saying a public mass, is enough to warrant him being removed from the circuit, whilst investigations are ongoing. 
    An allegation is a 'he said, she said' situation.  Innocent until proven guilty.  That's how canon law works.  Rushing to judgement is female hysteria and emotion.


    Offline TheRealMcCoy

    • Supporter
    • ***
    • Posts: 1477
    • Reputation: +1105/-231
    • Gender: Female
    • The Thread Killer
    Re: Man arrested for email
    « Reply #341 on: October 08, 2025, 02:45:03 PM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • Pax, to get an idea of who you are really talking to, see his writings:

    https://wherepeteris.com/author/gareth-thomas-weaver/

    https://equusasinus.net
    Got it. Just another round of content farming for the next blog hit piece: “Evil Trads Don’t Care About the Children.”

    Offline Justinian

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 85
    • Reputation: +45/-46
    • Gender: Female
    Re: Man arrested for email
    « Reply #342 on: October 08, 2025, 02:54:25 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!1

  • Offline Avis

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 61
    • Reputation: +51/-15
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Man arrested for email
    « Reply #343 on: October 08, 2025, 03:09:54 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Gareth/Dunstan, before you leave would you like to tell us who put you on to this story? You have been open about your name, so please be open about this. 

    Offline Pax Vobis

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 12740
    • Reputation: +8119/-2502
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Man arrested for email
    « Reply #344 on: October 08, 2025, 03:30:30 PM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • We've really had a "British Invasion" lately -- Boru, Justinian, Dunstan, Godefroy.