1. You 'beg the question' that there are issues. Nothing has been proven. An allegation isn't proof.
2. Innocent until proven guilty -- at least that's an American concept of justice. Maybe in Britain it's guilty, then innocent? Sure seems that's your view.
An allegation against a priest that's saying a public mass, is enough to warrant him being removed from the circuit, whilst investigations are ongoing. Yet there is no evidence of any investigation.
Why is that so difficult to understand?
Would you hire an alleged alcoholic to work in your bar? Of course not.
Especially in trad circles where silence, cover ups, payoffs and transfers to new a chapel where no one knows the prior history, is the norm.
Saint Peter Damian, Brandano da Petroio and Savonarola had no problem speaking publicly and forcefully about the sɛҳuąƖ sins of men of the Church. That's what we need right now as canon law isn't cutting it.