I think when the Cathinfo doc hits the youtube, this comment will highlight some interesting contradictions.

As I have stated several times, I do not lie. My husband and myself did indeed have dinner with Fr. Morgan, Bishop Williamson and Fr. Abraham. We know - or rather knew Fr. Morgan quite well - he was a regular visitor to Ireland - participated in the book club we had going here - and we had him over to dinner in our family home. He also oversaw St. Michael's school where our son attended. He has a lovely winsome charm about him and is the perfect host.

As for Fr. Abraham - yes, it is quite easy to see the character of some people upon one afternoon of mixing. Fr. Abraham is a simple soul who does not have the capacity to hold his ground under a line of questioning. I know this as a verifiable fact through a ex-resistance friend who questioned him about another issue. Fr. Abraham is an open book.

With regards to the so-called 6 page letter from "Kershaw" - if you read it, it opens with a warning that Moran had arranged a meeting with "Mr. Paul Sanford, Chief Constable of Norfolk police, a police force located in the jurisdiction of England and Wales" on October 18th, 2025. Through an ex-cop friend who now works in the child safety department, Weaver established that no such meeting was arranged or took place.

As for the rest of the letter - it is almost word for word - what the character 'truthy' wrote here on Cathinfo.

I do not like Mr. Weaver's wholesale attacks upon the SSPX however I concede that Mr. Weaver has a point; there have been a lot of cover ups that the SSPX should be held accountable for; Fr. Rostand immediately comes to mind. The same should be said of the Resistance. If there are possible child abusers within your midst, they need to be rooted out. It is not an attack on your beliefs - its a justifiable attack on the SSPX/Resistance lack of proper child safety protocol. This has to be addressed - openly and with great clarity. It's in all our interests.

If Mr. Moran was truly innocent, he would have quietly waited for the canonical process of appeal (if there is one) to reach its conclusion. But he did not. He deceived Archbishop Vigano into ordaining him - a mere two or three months after his laicisation - and then, without any proper training, went onto the Resistance Mass circuit keeping his identity a secret. When found out, and confronted, he went into immediate attack mode - lodging complaints to the local police force claiming harassment, and sending false 'lawyer's' letters claiming the same.

If Mr. Moran was truly innocent, he would have quietly waited for the canonical process of appeal (if there is one) to reach its conclusion. But he did not. He deceived Archbishop Vigano into ordaining him - a mere two or three months after his laicisation - and then, without any proper training, went onto the Resistance Mass circuit keeping his identity a secret.

This of course brings into question the validly of his alleged ordination, especially as he was laicised only last year (June 2024) and yet presented himself as an ordained pries less than a year later. Again, I use the word alleged, because it is shrouded in secrecy; no one knows who ordained him, when he was ordained, or whether he is simply claiming to be ordained. Perhaps, and I am speculating, this is what His Grace Archbishop Vigano was alluding to when he said himself and His Lordship Bishop Williamson had been deceived.

All I can say is that I don’t get the point of this thread.  Nobody has all the facts.  This site isn’t affiliated with the persons involved.  Most people on this site aren’t even from Europe.  I don’t get the point of all this back n forth. 

All I can say is that I don’t get the point of this thread.  Nobody has all the facts.  This site isn’t affiliated with the persons involved.  Most people on this site aren’t even from Europe.  I don’t get the point of all this back n forth. 

As I have stated several times, I do not lie. My husband and myself did indeed have dinner with Fr. Morgan, Bishop Williamson and Fr. Abraham. We know - or rather knew Fr. Morgan quite well - he was a regular visitor to Ireland - participated in the book club we had going here - and we had him over to dinner in our family home. He also oversaw St. Michael's school where our son attended. He has a lovely winsome charm about him and is the perfect host.

As for Fr. Abraham - yes, it is quite easy to see the character of some people upon one afternoon of mixing. Fr. Abraham is a simple soul who does not have the capacity to hold his ground under a line of questioning. I know this as a verifiable fact through a ex-resistance friend who questioned him about another issue. Fr. Abraham is an open book.

With regards to the so-called 6 page letter from "Kershaw" - if you read it, it opens with a warning that Moran had arranged a meeting with "Mr. Paul Sanford, Chief Constable of Norfolk police, a police force located in the jurisdiction of England and Wales" on October 18th, 2025. Through an ex-cop friend who now works in the child safety department, Weaver established that no such meeting was arranged or took place.

As for the rest of the letter - it is almost word for word - what the character 'truthy' wrote here on Cathinfo.

I do not like Mr. Weaver's wholesale attacks upon the SSPX however I concede that Mr. Weaver has a point; there have been a lot of cover ups that the SSPX should be held accountable for; Fr. Rostand immediately comes to mind. The same should be said of the Resistance. If there are possible child abusers within your midst, they need to be rooted out. It is not an attack on your beliefs - its a justifiable attack on the SSPX/Resistance lack of proper child safety protocol. This has to be addressed - openly and with great clarity. It's in all our interests.

If Mr. Moran was truly innocent, he would have quietly waited for the canonical process of appeal (if there is one) to reach its conclusion. But he did not. He deceived Archbishop Vigano into ordaining him - a mere two or three months after his laicisation - and then, without any proper training, went onto the Resistance Mass circuit keeping his identity a secret. When found out, and confronted, he went into immediate attack mode - lodging complaints to the local police force claiming harassment, and sending false 'lawyer's' letters claiming the same.

Welcome to CInfo FrereRabit...
St Evaristus, pray for us.

Any new info about " " " Father " " " Moran is greatly appreciated. This Rebuttal letter is the starting point of Part II of the "Will the real Fr. Moran please step forward " case.
 Anyone could notice the >3 typos in the letter: real lawyers are really careful with any official docuмents , so I am easily persuaded that the Rebuttal is fake.

God bless+

The 6-page letter from the fake priest posing as a fake lawyer on the evening of 18th October, in order to scare the Editor of WPI into cancelling the story, used a fake email address of a real canon lawyer in Rome. Now that the real email address of the real lawyer has been identified, the identity theft by Moran can be exposed (and indeed has been!)

I wonder what are the legal implications of impersonating a world class Roman canon lawyer? Maybe having the East Anglia diocese safeguarding officer and Norfolk police watching for his next move is the least of Ciaran Moran's problems now.

"Oh, what a tangled web we weave when first we practice to deceive." (From "Marmion" by Walter Scott.)

https://equusasinus.net/2025/10/26/__alkershaw_canon_lawyer/

• 2. "Never go outside the experience of your people."
• 3. "Whenever possible go outside of the experience of the enemy."
• 4. "Make the enemy live up to its own book of rules."
• 5. "Ridicule is man's most potent weapon. There is no defense. It is almost impossible to counterattack ridicule. Also it    infuriates the opposition, who then react to your advantage."
• 6. "A good tactic is one your people enjoy."
• 7. "A tactic that drags on too long becomes a drag."
• 8. "Keep the pressure on."
• 9. "The threat is usually more terrifying than the thing itself."
• 10. "The major premise for tactics is the development of operations that will maintain a constant pressure upon the opposition."
• 11. "If you push a negative hard and deep enough it will break through into its counterside; this is based on the principle that every positive has its negative."
• 12. "The price of a successful attack is a constructive alternative."
• 13. "Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it."

If I meet a "priest" and he will not even tell me who ordained him, he is not even stepping foot on my driveway.