Part of the article posted by this weaver character today: (
https://equusasinus.net/2025/10/19/shattered-safeguards-minors-at-risk-in-traditionalist-splinter-group/)
Kerry Ciarán Moran: background and movement
"On 9 October 2025, I phoned the Resistance’s Broadstairs headquarters—Williamson’s former residence, now Morgan’s. Father Stephen Abraham, the secretary (who has his own personal history), answered. I disclosed preparing this article for WPI and sought Morgan’s comment. Abraham claimed Morgan was absent but confirmed that Moran had moved on to Norfolk, saying, “Yes, so what?” Panicking at my intent to quote him, he took the phone into the garden and spoke to Morgan. I overheard Morgan snap, “Abraham returned inside and confirmed Moran’s ordinations by Viganò and Williamson before ending the call.
I was also eventually able to speak directly with Moran by phone. I had left a message earlier in the week, and then received a call on Sunday evening 12 October. The caller would not give his name when I asked and spoke cautiously, with an accent I could not quite so I knew it was a respoinse to my phone message (nobody calls and is keen to speak to you without wanting to say who they are!) I thought it might be a Welsh accent with traces of Irish brogue. I said, “You must be Father Moran?” That much seemed to be clear – without him confirming his name – when he wanted to talk about my message left on his phone offering longer help with his situation – which I said I had heard about through ‘mutual contacts’ – and there might be a longer-term option for him at a priory in France. He did not dismiss the idea and, in the course of the conversation, confirmed that he was staying in private house which was a former convent, as three sources had previously suggested. My sole purpose was to confirm his whereabouts in order to alert the local dioceser that there was a possible risk.
In the phone call the person I was talking to had also brought up what he described as an appeal to Rome against his laicisation, a claim he has repeatedly made to people when therre were questions about his about his unusual status. I asked him directly whether he genuinely believed such an appeal was underway. After a long pause, he said only that the matter was “very complicated” and could be explained later. Before ending the call, he said he would need to discuss any move to France with others — particularly Bishop Giacomo Ballini – whom I had mentioned as the ‘mutual friend’ and my source of his phone number.
So the call confirmed his location and ongoing coordination with Resistance bishops (at least Ballini) and the following, Monday morning 13 October I provided all the relevant details to the diocesan the safeguarding officer, which were very gratefully received and he made immediate enquiries, then came back to me for a fuller diclosure of details about the entire story and dates of canon law procedures etc., which I was able to furnish from my research. A social worker had noted that such individuals excel at credible backstories, highlighting the need for rigorous checks that are absent in these splinter groups. But there was something quite chilling in that phone call and the accent I found difficult to identify. I had not been speaking to Moran! That will be explained shortly."
AND
Another section taken from the article:
Postscript: a fake lawyer as well as a fake priest
"As this story was being prepared for publication on 18 October 2025, the Editor of wherepeteris.com received an email from a person claiming to be a canon lawyer, with a six-page legal docuмent attached, betraying knowledge of the first draft of this story – obtained through a leak which I have now sourced – and threatening legal action. (I am attaching the docuмent to this website so it can be opened and viewed by readers.) The Editor said he could not possibly publish this story in this circuмstances. I said I understood and would continue to explore the situation.
The lawyer’s email addres was unusual, made using his name ****** plus @lawyer.com . an address acquired looking at the commercial website
http://lawyer.com a USA platform where lawyers post their presence for clients. But UK clients cannot entand ger an enquiry, the drop down menu is just for US states. In the letter a canon lawyer’s name is given and there is indeed such a canon lawyer in Rome. But the middle initial in the email address was wrong (“L” instead of “R” – a sloppy error).
But most interesting of all was this: “I can confirm unequivocally that Mr. Weaver did not speak with my client, Mr. Ciarán Kerry Moran. Had Mr. Weaver exercised even a modicuм of journalistic diligence, he would have discerned that the individual with whom he conversed was of Caribbean extraction—a fact that is immediately apparent upon listening to the recording of the conversation. The assertion that Mr. Moran spoke “with a Welsh accent and traces of Irish inflection [sic]” is not only inaccurate but demonstrably false. It is either the product of negligent reporting or a deliberate misrepresentation.”
The man who would not give his name in his call to me was likely one of the family members sheltering Mr Moran in his present place of refuge. As you see from my account of that call to me, he never gave his name, and I struggled to identify the accent of a man known to have been born in Wales of Irish parentage. I would never have guessed Caribbean! But it all adds up when you join the dots.
The scam has worked: Moran has intimidated the Editor and he cancelled publication. In the letter Moran also betrays his bullying modus operandi threatening that he will go to the police, as he and Bishop Morgan did when he persuaded Bedfordshire police to arrest the Kavanaghs; for he starts off his letter talking about an “appointment with “the Chief Constable of Norfolk”, i.e. a man of such high rank that if you wrote him an email it would probably take two weeks to finally get to the local police station and send a constable round to see what is the problem. (Not just that, but like the Disciplinary Section of the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith in Rome, as I just discovered half an hour ago – see what I did there! – the chap at the top never lists his email.)
I had been told by all the professionals that these people with a history of manipulation who pose a risk are very difficult to deal with. Now I have seen it for myself and I am amazed. But the safeguarding loopholes must be fixed. Not my job. I can only flag it up. I am simply blowing the whistle, but amazed people didn’t blow it months ago!"