I think we all have the good sense to suspect that there is another underlying motive for these canonizations; besides merely affirming that the alleged saints were pardoned for his sins at the time of death, and are enjoying the Beatific Vision.
Certainly trads will have (correctly imo) hypothesized that they were canonized to further aid the enemy's futile efforts to destroy the Church, yet trads worth the label still have those last rites received by both popes to contend with.
MMagdala:
And Stubborn, my friend, by your standard every Catholic who received Extreme Unction near death is a Saint and at some point should be canonized. Don't think so.
Not so dear. I am not oblivious to the implications of what I am saying, but there are numerous Catholic ways to look at this situation first, rather than first ignoring it entirely as though it were some non-event - just as the NOers do. To ignore such an event is to blow off as meaningless that which is most certainly the most colossally important of all the events of their entire lifetime, namely, their having received the last sacraments in their last agony.
We do not know with any certainty if they were saved via the sacrament, but we know that the Church (Trent) teaches that the sacrament
"washes away the sins that remain to be atoned, and the vestiges of sin", so it is only with faith, perhaps very great faith for some, that we believe they escaped hell. To believe the sacrament did not produce this, it's intended effect, is to admit of having a decided lack of faith in the sacrament.
God would have forgiven even Judas if he would have asked for forgiveness, well, it is apparent that these Judas' actually did ask for forgiveness, and by all appearances, they received it.