Isn't the whole point of this thread to accept JXXIII, PVI, JPI, JPII, BXVI, F as popes but none of them as saints, especially not Mr. Assisi JPII?
To accomplish this you quote the testimony of a modernist prelate of the conciliar sect (and protégé of JPII)?
That's not my point, but it might be others'. I like to view questions like these in isolation and as impartially as I can. I'm not "married" to an agenda (i.e. Sede, R&R, etc). I try to let the facts lead me to the truth. I'm not saying I can be 100% impartial, but I try to be. I think many will (hopefully) have the same approach, but there are surely those who do not (and it's readily apparent who they are).
Further, we must distinguish between 1) a canonization simply saying that person X is in heaven, vs 2) person X is in heaven because of HEROIC VIRTUE. As even the V2 prelates have pointed out, a canonization does not necessarily mean that the "saint" is perfect. The meaning of "worthy of veneration" in the canonization declaration does not mean we have to personally approve of person X's life, their ideas, their choices. It doesn't mean that they didn't sin from scandals, and it doesn't condone their many quasi-heretical actions. It simply means we have to venerate them "being in heaven". At the end of the day, can I, as a traditional catholic, agree that JPII and John XXIII are in heaven? Sure, if the Church says so.
The standards of what a post-V2 "saint" is, in regards to veneration and (what used to be understood as) "sanctity" have been quite lowered, just like the process of investigation has been corrupted.
---
p.s. I find that quoting V2 prelates is a great way to prove a point. If a V2 official says that the canonization of JPII means that he is simply "in heaven" and is not a commentary on his life, his actions or his virtue, then this proves that the conciliar church has watered-down the idea of canonization to the point where their meaning for it is different than in pre-V2 times. Thus, the "bar has been lowered" so that a traditional catholic can "accept" such canonizations without hesitation because V2 has changed the meaning and purpose of the entire process...just like they've done with almost everything else.