No. And I wasn't even saying it was. The Catechist said that no pictures of naked infants are pornographic, and I say that there are surely some, and labeled the ones that are, child pornography. I didn't even say that the one she linked was one. I did say, though, that the totally obscene photograph that she linked was invasive, and not labeled in a way that people would be warned not to look at it. THAT was the real issue.
I'm not going to belabor the point though.