"Pope Francis(sic) surely means to bring men to God(sic)"?
To what god is Bergoglio intending to bring men? To the god of ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖity?
To the god of atheism? To the god of the moslem? To the god of the
Christ-haters? To the anti-Catholic god?
There is only One True God. Our God ordered us to tear down the altars to all the false
Gods. Since our Father went up into the mountain to receive the Tablets from our God, we have been playing around with false gods. The men had gathered all their gold and had it fashioned into a god, and Our Father smashed it to pieces!
Ratzinger placed, as did Wyjtola before him, images of all their false gods upon the altar at Assissi, and the Archbishop lamented that we are very close to saying that he is no pope! Bishop de Castro Mayer was more forceful and direct. He wasn't trying for twenty five years to make a deal with heathen Rome. Bp. de Castro Mayer, at the consecration of the four bishops (including H. E. Williamson), at which he was both witness and co-consecrator, proclaimed:
"We do not have a pope--there is no pope!"
This brave bishop, who was running the only diocese in the entire world according to the eternal Catholic principles, saw clearly that Rome had lost the faith-- and that Wyjtola was not the pope of the Roman Catholic Church of Jesus Christ (everyone, of course, knew he was the pope of the Conciliar Church of Vatican II). And Ratzinger? Archbishop Lefebvre battled him and his crony periti at the Council, and clearly declared that "he is not Catholic."
The brain-washing and programming of Fellay, Lorans, Dici, the Cor Unums, and their mouthpieces has been quite successful. Even though the SSPX has seemingly mortally wounded itself, all its "resisters" have bought the same argument-- they only debate the terms and the timing of crawling back into the harlots bed.
And this is a very important point. God commanded that we have NO false gods before us (part of our duty to God); He also commanded that we not covet our neighbors wife ( part of our duties to our fellow man). These commandments are equal in import and power. They are two sides of the same coin. Like man, "male and female He created them"-- you can't have one without the other.
To seek refuge in the temple of a false God, is the same as to seek comfort in thr bed of the harlot. Every single one of her accusers had slowly slinked away. One minute they wanted to stone her to death; the next minute they tried to hide their face from their sins. "Who accuseth you," asked the Lord. "No one man, Master." "and neither do I --go, and sin no more!"
The men were chasing the harlot; they were following false gods. That is the re-enactment today going on in the SSPX. When you are chasing the harlot; when you are going after false gods, of course you speech cannot be "Yeah, Yeah and No, No" -- everything has to be carefully crafted so your "wife"(the Catholic faithful) never realizes what you're up to. So, you come up with crazy stories, like:
"He freed the Mass", "He lifted the excommunications". "He's really traditional", "They accept us as we are", "Only Fellay has the grace to decide these things". "He retracted the AFD(in some basement in a chapel in Ireland)", "the novus ordo mass brings Jesus Christ down on the altar", and "Pope Francis wants to bring man to god."
If these popes , these past forty years, have truly been the Vicars of Our Lord Jesus Christ, how dare we, for even one minute, contemplate resisting them and disobeying ALL their orders snd commands. If Jesus Christ is truly represented by the Jєω-loving, buddhist-loving, moslem- loving, atheist-loving "popes" of the Conciliar Church, then the Archbishop was dead wrong, and is properly consigned to Eternal Fire, where all excommunicated must go!
Rather, it is the leaders of the SSPX, and figures of the so called resistance, who are earning for themselves the wrath of Almighty God, because they are leading souls astray, and away from the True Church.