If he had become a priest I would have dreaded his sermons. Too Long.
You know, the works of Shakespeare would have taken up much *more* space. So what? The question is: how well-written are they, how much substance is there, etc.
And you, ggreg, are not qualified to talk about those things since you JUST found this post. All you can do 5 minutes after I posted this is scroll down with your mouse, and see how long it's going to take to read it all. Sorry. His story happens to take place over 7 or more years, and a LOT happened during that time.
He is telling his story. Trust me, it's pure substance. I read the whole thing and it was very easy to read.
P.S. You'll forgive me for removing your post,
because it was OBVIOUSLY SHOT FROM THE HIP without having read so much as a few paragraphs. Please read the story first, THEN discuss. It's the only honest and decent way to act.