Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Don't shoot the messenger. I like to copy things for posterity. Quote from: FranciscoAnd this is what the SSPX theologian Francois Laisney has just written:http://www.sspxasia.com/Pseudo_anti_liberal_illusion.pdfDISTINCTION: SUBMISSION TO THE SUCCESSOR OF PETERWhere is the problem then? It comes from the fact that many of those who possess authority in the Church today are infected by liberalism to diverse degrees. This neither Bishop Fellay nor any priest of the SSPX denies. But, while Bishop Fellay and the faithful priests of the SSPX, following the example of Archbishop Lefebvre, make the distinction between being subject to the successor of Peter as successor of Peter and not as liberal, nay, while resisting his liberalism, those who oppose Bishop Fellay seems to be viscerally unable to make such distinction and persevere in their ignorance of the teaching of St Augustine against the Donatists: in the Catholic Church communion with the bad ones does not harm the good ones so long as they do not consent to their evilness. The words bad ones translate the Latin mali. Put liberals in place of bad ones, since liberalism is bad, and the principle of St Augustine is exactly the position of Bishop Fellay and the refutation of those who oppose him: in the Catholic Church, communion with the liberals does not harm the good ones so long as they do not consent with their liberalism.
And this is what the SSPX theologian Francois Laisney has just written:http://www.sspxasia.com/Pseudo_anti_liberal_illusion.pdf
the teaching of St Augustine against the Donatists: in the Catholic Church communion with the bad ones does not harm the good ones so long as they do not consent to their evilness.
Therefore, is it necessary to leave the official Church? To some extent, yes, obviously.The whole book of Mr. Madiran "The Heresy of the Twentieth Century" is the story of the heresy of the bishops.It is therefore necessary to leave the bishops’ environment, if you do not want to lose the soul.But that's not enough, as it is in Rome where the heresy is settled. If the bishops are heretics (even without taking this term in his canonical sense and consequences) is not without the influence of Rome.If we move away from these people, is quite the same way as people with AIDS. There is no desire to catch it. Now, they have spiritual AIDS, infectious diseases. If you want to save your health, you need not to go with them.