Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Letter of Bp. de Castro Mayer rejecting the TFP  (Read 5763 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Re: Letter of Bp. de Castro Mayer rejecting the TFP
« Reply #20 on: July 02, 2019, 02:51:06 PM »
Let's go back to the OP.
LETTER OF BISHOP DE CASTRO MAYER ON THE TFP

(The following letter, addressed to a layman friend, dated 1984, was published in the Brazilian newspaper Folha da Manhã in 1991)

Dear N.,

I owe you an answer to your painful letter of September 24 [1984] that, as the postmark indicates, you sent me on September 25th.

In this case I can only give you one advice: pray, pray a lot, above all the [15 decade] Rosary or at least the [5 decade] Rosary, asking the Virgin Mother, Mediatrix of all graces, to enlighten her son and make him see that the TFP is a heretical sect because, in fact, although they do not say or write, the TFP lives and behaves according to a principle that fundamentally undermines the truth of Christendom, that is, of the Catholic Church.

Indeed, it is de fide that Jesus Christ founded His Church - designed to keep the true worship of God on earth and to bring souls to eternal salvation - as an unequal society composed of two classes: one that governs, teaches, and sanctifies, composed of members of the clergy, and another - the faithful - who receive the teaching, are governed and sanctified: This is a dogma de fide.

St. Pius X wrote that the Church is, in its own nature, an unequal society, meaning that it comprises two orders of persons: shepherds and flock, those belonging to the various levels of the hierarchy, and the multitude of the faithful. These two orders are so utterly distinct that only the hierarchy has the right and authority to guide and govern the members for the purposes of the Church, while the duty of the faithful is to let themselves to be governed and to obediently follow the given path by the ruling class. (Encyclical "Vehementer", February 11, 1906.) The whole history of the Church, as can be seen in the New Testament, attests to this truth as a fundamental dogma of the Church's constitution. It was only to the Apostles that Jesus said, "Go and teach all nations." Also the Acts of the Apostles show us the life of the Church in the times after Jesus Christ. Because of this, it is a heretical subversion to usually follow a layman - therefore a non-member of the Hierarchy - as a spokesman for orthodoxy. So they do not look at what the Church says, what the bishops say, but what this or that [layman] says... And it does not end there: this attitude - even if not openly stated - in fact positions the "leader" as the arbiter of orthodoxy, and is accompanied by a sudden but real mistrust of the hierarchy and clergy in general.

There is a visceral anti-clericalism in the TFP: everything that comes from the clergy is biasedly received. Basically, it is affirmed that all priests are ignorant, lacking zeal or interested and such other characteristics. Well, thus, having in mind the divine constitution of the Church which was instituted by Jesus Christ, the habitual anti-clericalism of the TFP, latent, makes it a heretical sect, and therefore, as I said, animated by a principle contrary to established dogma by Jesus Christ in the constitution of His Church.

The TFP, however, had a healthy beginning. There was a certain evolution in the apostolate made by the biweekly newspaper of the Marian Congregation of St. Cecilia entitled The Legionary.

As a serious and well-intentioned movement, it sought to strengthen the intellectual and religious formation of the members of the Congregation and, consequently, of the biweekly readers. It was influential throughout Brazil. This was the era of [its] obedience to Monsignors Duarte and Leme. I followed and approved of its apostolate, also when it began to fall itself into the anti-clerical spirit, which began by consolidating its positions and then reversing them, putting the Clergy in tow behind a charismatic layman with the monopoly of orthodoxy. Maybe I gave them support beyond a licit point. I withdrew it only when it became clear that my warnings were not being taken into account. They have become useless.

It is true to note that the deceptions of certain members of the Hierarchy... explain the scandal of the "TFPists", but this does not justify the positions they have taken. And much less for its leader, Plinio.

In this case, as I said at the beginning of this letter, the remedy is to pray. First, because without prayer nothing is obtained: "Ask," says Our Lord, "and you will receive." It is necessary to pray because charismatic fervor produces a certain fanaticism: individuals become incapable of seeing the objective reality, of perceiving even fundamental errors, because of this inversion of following a layman instead of the legitimate Pastors of the Holy Church. 
As I have noted, members of the hierarchy unfortunately and often utter words and take positions that any Catholic can see as dissonant of the doctrine and government of the Church of all times...

I ask Our Lord to give you, and your whole family, a Holy and Merry Christmas and many years full of the grace of God.

I pray that you pray for me, a servant in Christ Jesus.

Antônio de Castro Mayer, Bishop Emeritus of Campos.

Re: Letter of Bp. de Castro Mayer rejecting the TFP
« Reply #21 on: July 03, 2019, 11:45:53 AM »
Women with too much time on their hands, it is the ruin of CathInfo. Women like Cera and Meg are a punishment from God upon anyone stupid enough to listen to them. 

Instructions to Women
In like manner women also in decent apparel: adorning themselves with modesty and sobriety, not with plaited hair, or gold, or pearls, or costly attire, But as it becometh women professing godliness, with good works. Let the woman learn in silence, with all subjection.  But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to use authority over the man: but to be in silence.  For Adam was first formed; then Eve.  And Adam was not seduced; but the woman being seduced, was in the transgression.  Yet she shall be saved through childbearing; if she continue in faith, and love, and sanctification, with sobriety.(1Tim 2:9-15)


Offline Meg

Re: Letter of Bp. de Castro Mayer rejecting the TFP
« Reply #22 on: July 03, 2019, 01:33:46 PM »
Women with too much time on their hands, it is the ruin of CathInfo. Women like Cera and Meg are a punishment from God upon anyone stupid enough to listen to them.

Instructions to Women
In like manner women also in decent apparel: adorning themselves with modesty and sobriety, not with plaited hair, or gold, or pearls, or costly attire, But as it becometh women professing godliness, with good works. Let the woman learn in silence, with all subjection.  But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to use authority over the man: but to be in silence.  For Adam was first formed; then Eve.  And Adam was not seduced; but the woman being seduced, was in the transgression.  Yet she shall be saved through childbearing; if she continue in faith, and love, and sanctification, with sobriety.(1Tim 2:9-15)

Women who disagree with your views need to keep silent. Got it. The thing is, there are men who don't agree with your views. Should they keep silent as well?

Re: Letter of Bp. de Castro Mayer rejecting the TFP
« Reply #23 on: July 03, 2019, 02:13:19 PM »
Let's go back to the OP.
LETTER OF BISHOP DE CASTRO MAYER ON THE TFP

(The following letter, addressed to a layman friend, dated 1984, was published in the Brazilian newspaper Folha da Manhã in 1991)

Trad Granny,


Here's an example of "visceral anti-clericalism".



Furthermore, here's  a scholarly definition, with examples of the term and it doesn't fit Dr. Plineo's behavior at all. anti-clericalism


Dr. Plineo was at Vatican II trying to rally the clerics to walk-out in protest of the communist-infiltrated commissions and engineered schemas.  If you had ever read "The Rhine Flows Through the Tiber", you would know that the council had been hijacked.

Corrêa de Oliveira travelled to Rome for the opening session of Vatican II, describing it as “a point in history as sad as the Death of Our Lord” in which the Church was faced by the generalized, co-ordinated, and audacious action of its internal enemies. Oliveira was accompanied by members of the Brazilian TFP who brought twenty trunks of TFP literature. During the first session of the Council, he provided a secretariat which served Brazilian bishops Antônio de Castro Mayer and Geraldo de Proença Sigaud and other bishops of the traditional faction, who ultimately formed the Coetus Internationalis Patrum. Corrêa de Oliveira’s opposition to the direction of the Council continued, and in a 1976 addendum to his book, Revolution and Counter-Revolution, he described Vatican II as “one of the greatest calamities, if not the greatest, in the history of the Church”. His strong opposition led to him being described as a “revanchist” within the ultraditional faction.


And if Bp. de Castro Meyer didn't like it that Plineo didn't follow him, could it be because the Bishop had signed the Vatican II docs and wasn't taking action to protest against the Council?  

In fact, he didn't even publicly join +ABL until after he had retired his office.  
This was not traditional Catholic leadership on his part.  

Dr. Plineo's Lay Catholic action was not hindered by such compromises, which we now call "false-obedience".


Re: Letter of Bp. de Castro Mayer rejecting the TFP
« Reply #24 on: July 04, 2019, 02:38:22 AM »
Trad Granny,


Here's an example of "visceral anti-clericalism".



Furthermore, here's  a scholarly definition, with examples of the term and it doesn't fit Dr. Plineo's behavior at all. anti-clericalism


Dr. Plineo was at Vatican II trying to rally the clerics to walk-out in protest of the communist-infiltrated commissions and engineered schemas.  If you had ever read "The Rhine Flows Through the Tiber", you would know that the council had been hijacked.

Corrêa de Oliveira travelled to Rome for the opening session of Vatican II, describing it as “a point in history as sad as the Death of Our Lord” in which the Church was faced by the generalized, co-ordinated, and audacious action of its internal enemies. Oliveira was accompanied by members of the Brazilian TFP who brought twenty trunks of TFP literature. During the first session of the Council, he provided a secretariat which served Brazilian bishops Antônio de Castro Mayer and Geraldo de Proença Sigaud and other bishops of the traditional faction, who ultimately formed the Coetus Internationalis Patrum. Corrêa de Oliveira’s opposition to the direction of the Council continued, and in a 1976 addendum to his book, Revolution and Counter-Revolution, he described Vatican II as “one of the greatest calamities, if not the greatest, in the history of the Church”. His strong opposition led to him being described as a “revanchist” within the ultraditional faction.


And if Bp. de Castro Meyer didn't like it that Plineo didn't follow him, could it be because the Bishop had signed the Vatican II docs and wasn't taking action to protest against the Council?  

In fact, he didn't even publicly join +ABL until after he had retired his office.  
This was not traditional Catholic leadership on his part.  

Dr. Plineo's Lay Catholic action was not hindered by such compromises, which we now call "false-obedience".
That's the beauty about R&R.  You can fit a square peg into a round hole and vice versa!