In 2006, TIA published their extensive photographic comparisons, proving the new Sr. Lucy was a fake.
According to Most Holy Family Monastery, (not that I am a fan) TIA stole their research:
https://www.mostholyfamilymonastery.com/catholic/two-sister-lucys-traditioninaction/We were definitely the first organization to come out with the facts that there was an impostor Sr. Lucy. We had been referring to the false Sr. Lucy as an impostor for years on our website, and publicly stated that the Vatican’s Lucy is an impostor in issue #5 of our magazine, which was published years ago. Our
recent article was simply the detailed treatment containing all the facts and points about an issue we’d been saying things about for years.
While the website to which you refer says that they haven’t yet “read” our analysis – that’s an interesting way of putting it considering that one can get the gist of what was being said without “reading” the entire thing but by looking quickly at the pictures – they didn’t deny that they were familiar with the article
or that their idea to publish their own article came after hearing about or browsing through our exposé. It’s almost certain that they were familiar with our article because a website which links to their articles
and our articles had a major link with pictures to our treatment of the issue. They may have browsed it without “reading” the entire thing.
And once they saw that this idea was now circulating due to our having “broken the story,” they then had the courage to do their own article seeing that others were already beginning to accept the idea on a wide scale. That’s a key point: many people who don’t love God first and don’t stand for the truth will come out with things – even things they may have privately known were true for some time –
only once the idea has already gained some popular support thanks to the stand of others, so that they can latch on to the now-popular bandwagon.
Topic: Letter of Bp. de Castro Mayer rejecting the TFP (Read 5764 times)