Came across these clarifications from His Excellency.

http://www.sspxasia.com/index.htm

Sorry if it's been posted already. They are new and I didn't see anything here yet.

(I can't edit the title of the thread but I had put a + before His Excellency's name, it didn't show up.)

EVERY laity who supports or has supported the Society in the past is being spoon fed leaked docuмents, at regular intervals it seems, for a purpose.  This current docuмent is a handwritten note to a District Superior outlining a summary of a private conversation the Bishop had with Fr. Chazal.  This private communication then finds it's way onto the SSPX Asia website prominently labeled.  It is fair to ask why it is there and if it should be there.  

Did all parties to the letter agree to post it on the internet? On the SSPX website?  A private conversation that could be considered disciplinary in nature to a priest should not be a public matter. Meanwhile, important information such a the explicit terms of the doctrinal preamble have never intentionally been made public.    What's going on here?  

Well, it is very disappointing that such abuse of information media is being used as tool to motivate, discourage, influence those who read it.  While I advocate a more transparent relationship with Society leadership, I do not believe the current officially handwritten leaked docuмent by the Bishop is ethical unless ALL parties have agreed to its presence. If they have, I stand a fool and accept that.  My sense is that we are being played for fools.

I find it very interesting that the handwritten note from +Tissier de Mallerais to Fr. Daniel Couture, clarifying his conversation with Fr. Chazal is in English.  The first language of all three is French.  This note must have been written solely to appear on the internet for mass consumption.  

Well it does say "FORWARD" and "URGENT" at the top - it would seem there are indeed other recipients intended who do not speak / read French.

I suppose the choice forced by this docuмent is:
Do we trust the words of Fr Chazal, or those of +TdM.
I trust the words of Fr Chazal.

I do find Domitilla's point interesting though. Why was this written in English, and no less to Asia district, when his ostensibly false memo was in French? I must agree, it was written solely for mass consumption, which further begs the question of whether he wrote of his free will.

To deny the authenticity of this letter is to deny blatantly obvious impeccable evidence.  It is quite entertaining to watch you pretend to doubt it, though.  

In case it is of any use for Matthew to have a narrower copy, here is what I took
directly off the enlarged image of the handwritten note, which is essentially the
same thing as SJ's first post, but for the glosses which I duly noted. I have also
preserved the line content, such that each line below matches each line in the
original (returns at the same places).




PLEASE FORWARD!
Through Singapore  +65 6459 3591
Through Manila       +63 2725 0785


+ Econe, September 7th, 2012

Dear Rev. Father Couture,
Please find here a short summary of what I said to
Father Chazal during our interview that took place at
Econe on Tuesday August 28th (if I remember)

<< 1) I understand your thinking against an agreement
with the modernistic Rome. I too am against it;
and everbody (sic) knows that I efficiently manifested
my opposition against any agreement without any
sign of conversion of the Conciliar Rome.

2) But I desagree (sic) with your means and ways.
In the little army of the Society of Saint Pius X,
you are a simple soldier, not a captain. Please
remain in your place. There are captains, who
can efficiently act by the General.

[I meant the district Superiors and our Bishops]

3) Please, accept to behave licke (as) a simple soldier
and have full confidence in the action of the
captains by (?) the General. They will surely
usefully intervene when necessary. >>

Dear Father, I hope that this truth about my inter-
view with Fr. Chazal will make peace in truth
in the minds of our beloved faithful.

May our Lady, who protected us against the peril
of being divided by Rome's attempts, keep all our
Faithful in the peaceful confidence in Her!

Your (sic) faithfully in Christ the King

                              +Bern (?) Tissier (?....)de Mallerais (?)

Here is an interesting video that I assume everyone has already seen, but that I provide as a reminder of how the SSPX is perceived by the rest of the world.  The "general's" handshake is at 3:20.