Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Letter from Fr. Pinaud  (Read 13438 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Letter from Fr. Pinaud
« Reply #25 on: June 25, 2013, 02:22:14 PM »
So, “Are the French Priests listening”. No, except for Fathers Faure (worth 1,000,000 of them, naturally), Rioult, Salenave, Pivert, etc. “Why? They should know better!” Because 1) of ABL’s angelism (explained in two ECs), and 2) “nadie es profeta en su tierra” (Our Lord, Monseñor Lefebvre, Monseñor Williamson, Father Faure, Father Trincado, and the other Resistants ones). So, what can be done? May be Matto (and others like him) is the answer for this precise second.

Now,  such as I see it (ignorant), the sedevacantism does not get along with the latin world. Bad Popes since juan el bueno (and throughout the convulsive history of the Church): yes. No Popes: no.  It is something in our blood, may be, and might explain the popularity of +W (non-sedevacantist from reading/listening to his words) in Brazil and Mexico. After the inminent (in my opinion) chastiment, the humble (to say the least) Church will study the subject (as has always done) and will pronounce.

Example: at the first visit of Monseñor Lefebvre to Argentina (197.?) many trads ran away from him -my father included, although later clarified- because of a bad translation from latin into spanish by Octavio Sequeiros (our good friend; now deceased), of a dispute in latin between Monseñor Lefebvre (non-sedevacantist) and Carlos Disandro (sedevacantist), making Monseñor Lefebvre appear as sedevacantist.  

Nevertheless: I am going to try to "make friends"  :sign-surrender: with sedevacantists, at this second. Can’t tell you the next second.


Letter from Fr. Pinaud
« Reply #26 on: June 25, 2013, 05:09:06 PM »
Quote from: ancien regime
Fr. Pinaud decided to play through this farce of a "trial."

The clue to this is here. He's not being held against his will, which would be illegal. He's doing it voluntarily so he can put forward his own opinion at the "trial". The other priest "arrested" with him (Fr. Rioult?) decided not to be tried and left.


Letter from Fr. Pinaud
« Reply #27 on: June 26, 2013, 01:06:33 PM »
Quote from: Elsa Zardini
"B from A" and "unbrandable". Thank you so much. The thing is somebody FULLY  of Monseñor Lefebvre's thinking and hence the Religion of God Trino (very important to other the word "trino") explains this to the French good  priests. This is crucial. Like it or not. What can I do?



Tell me if I'm wrong, but after reading this 5 times, it seems
that you must be trying to say the following:


The thing is, that somebody FULLY in cooperation with Monseñor Lefebvre's thinking, and hence with the Religion of the Triune God (it is very important to utter the word, "Trinity") should explain this[/b]* to the good French priests.


*Even so, I still have no idea what "this" is that
you're talking about.  You think it is crucial that "this"
is explained to the good French priests, but I do not
know what "this" is that should be explained to them.

And, who are the "good French priests" to whom you refer?




Letter from Fr. Pinaud
« Reply #28 on: June 26, 2013, 01:10:30 PM »
So he is waiting to be tried by a kangaroo court of his enemies. This is absurd. But if I was him I would wait to see the trial too.   :popcorn:

Letter from Fr. Pinaud
« Reply #29 on: June 26, 2013, 01:57:08 PM »
Yes Neil. Rather telegraphic.

"French good Priests": the 37 or similar number (avec l' immaculee; la sapiniere).

"This": the reproduction by B to A of Ethelred's and others related posts here in this thread, for these good priests to understand that they should not be scared of leaving the ExSSPX now (avec l' immaculee has an excellent article on this subject giving them all sorts of support), that this sell out has been going on for a long time, probably since Monseñor Lefebvre passed away, that they should read +W's Letter to Friends and Benefactors of 1 February 2001 (williamsonletters dot blogspot dot com) where everything is oulined. These explanations might (I don't know; "no tengo la bola de cristal"!), but might give them the certainty that they (the 37) are doing the correct thing by running away now that all this sell out is coming to light. As time goes by, I am afraid they might loosen. Transfers/non transfers.

Might be wrong, naturally. I am not religious nor knowledgeable. And, anyway, to whom are they going to listen to? Don't know...