Quote

The motive that matters is the motive that prompted Bp. Fellay to pen the letter (and then claim the letter was an "accident").

Sounds pretty desperate, doesn't he?  It will be the first letter ever, to my knowledge, deliberately written, posted as an email, or sent snail mail, and then explained away later as an "accident."  

I'm sure hollingsworth appreciates your support, but let's give others a turn.

Quote

Forum said:
I'm sure hollingsworth appreciates your (Nemmersdorf's?) support, but let's give others a turn.

I'm not certain why the "Forum" inserted this.  If Nemmersdorf and/or I are hogging the subject, it is not apparent by the almost total inactivity on this thread over the past couple of days. Neither Nemm., nor I, nor anyone else, has taken a turn.

Quote from: hollingsworth

Quote

The motive that matters is the motive that prompted Bp. Fellay to pen the letter (and then claim the letter was an "accident").

Sounds pretty desperate, doesn't he?  It will be the first letter ever, to my knowledge, deliberately written, posted as an email, or sent snail mail, and then explained away later as an "accident."  

Where did he say this?

Where did he make this claim or are you just making it up?  Also, why does your little circle neglect my previous question regarding the source?

Traditio or Traditor
(tradition or traitor)?
10-26-2011
SSPX.org commentary

A website ill-named Traditio has repeatedly spread sedevacantist rumors undermining the SSPX’s activities and sowing seeds of discords around the virtual globe. Recently (on October 11) they published some comments, which would not have been worth reporting if they had not been blatant lies.

Then it turned out that at the meeting of Neo-SSPX superiors in Albano, Italy, on October 7, 2011, not only was the Society's senior bishop, Richard Williamson, absent, but also absent was the Society's second-senior bishop, Tissier de Mallerais, having been banished by Fellay to Kansas City, Missouri, in the United States, to preside over another one of those incessant Neo-SSPX "conferences," which are designed to keep the Neo-SSPXers in line with Fellay's policy dictates. At the meeting Fellay was attacked by several Lefebvrite superiors who told Fellay point blank that they would not "engage in compromise with the false principles of the Second Vatican Council" with the New Order sect that the Society's Archbishop-Founder condemned as "uncatholic."
 
It is just a little too convenient that Fellay engineered the absence of the two most senior bishops from his own "Sellout Conference" in Albano, Italy, on October 7, 2011. Does this mean that Fellay's two senior bishops are now in disagreement with his sellout programme to Newrome? Even though Tissier had been scheduled for the Kansas City "conference" several months in advance, he could have flown to Italy anyway -- Albano was too important to miss and to allow Fellay to propagate his Novus Ordo propaganda.
Before clarifying these statements we must take note of their recent disappearance from Traditio’s website. They were quietly expunged, but without any apology or clarification offered either to Bishop Fellay or the SSPX for their gross inaccuracy¾especially as the true facts were always available.

The first “clarification” is the group photograph of the general chapter members who were present at the Albano meeting on October 7. It was taken in front of the SSPX’s Albano priory on October 7th and published on October 10th as part of DICI’s online press release. Traditio merely had to look at the photograph to see Bishop Tissier clearly present in the picture!

If Traditio believes that the SSPX faked this picture¾published before their comments(!)¾to disprove their accusations, we would gladly provide them chapter and verse of His Excellency’s flight schedule from Rome all the way to Kansas City on Saturday, October 8th, which allowed him to participate in the tail end of the Angelus Press Conference. Mind you, we kept him busy, having to go through a Pontifical Mass, and two conferences back-to-back under jet lag conditions. To be a traditional bishop is no picnic!

Traditio seems to know a lot about the secret meeting of Albano, particularly the crunchy news of the indignation of priests adverse to Bishop Fellay and his sellout to modernist Rome. This is to be contrasted with the placid official report of Bishop Fellay who simply mentioned the unanimous front of the Society superiors at the meeting. Again, we need to ask who of the two is right? Is Traditio giving us a scoop or another lie?

This obvious flaw is just one of a long “tradition” of false rumors. In the course of the last 10 years, it has persistently predicted that the SSPX was going to give in to the Modernists. The prophet has been fooled all along! But, now it pretends that the SSPX has not given in yet thanks to the sane warning of Traditio.

This website is feeding on rumors and writers, unworthy of the publicity given them. Unfortunately, whoever goes to visit them adds his support (indirectly at least) to the "trustworthy" sedevacantist rumor mill.

The absolute liberty of the virtual press leads to many contradictory statements. But it is not quite incidental that the web surfers are all too prone to check the latest, tastiest, wickedest, piece of news, sure bate to curious readers.

 “Lie, lie; something will eventually stick!” This was the motto of Voltaire who endeavored to “crush the infamous one”, the Church! Rather than let ourselves be led by the itching ears of the tale bearers, it is high time that traditional readers use their judgment. The multiplication of random information does not bring about the truth any more than one thousand idiots make one intelligent man. Erudition is nothing without wisdom.

By and large, it may not be untrue to say that the broader the media, the more superficial the message. Something to think about!