Author Topic: Letter from Bishop Fellay to Bishop Williamson (Read 75952 times)

Thursday · « **Reply #20 on:** October 14, 2011, 07:16:06 AM »

"I would be happy to invite you to the SSPX Superiors’ meeting to be held in Albano early in October, as the nature and composition of the meeting has been somewhat changed because of current events. I would also be happy to send you a text from Rome to which they want a reply. However, I find myself obliged to attach conditions to each of these points.

Firstly, as to the text, I ask of you an oath in writing that you will communicate to nobody either the text or its content. Too often in the past you have lacked discretion, so I am obliged to submit you to a procedure of this kind, which I am not happy to have to do.

Secondly, as to the meeting in Albano, I can only invite you to attend insofar as you stop publishing Eleison Comments. You have already been given the reason several times, as you have been given the order to stop."

So, it appears that Bishop Williamson has two choices. He can be present at these meeting s and look at the preamble if he produces an oath in writing that he will not reveal its contens AND that he will stop publishing his online letter. Why doesn't Bp Fellay just ask him to drop dead? For all practical purposes Bishop Williamson has already been kicked out of the SSPX.

Ethelred · « **Reply #21 on:** October 14, 2011, 08:16:15 AM »

Quote from: Seraphim

Unfortunately, you have it exactly backwards: This plays perfectly into the hands of BXVI, Bishop Fellay, and Krah/Jews:

I think that Maurice had no right to publish the letter. But now it's too late.
Where this situation plays into, we'll have to see. God will have the last word, and I know Bishop Williamson is on HIS side.

Quote

They now have their excuse to axe Bishop WIlliamson (which was almost certainly the plan all along, since the Jews object to him, as does Rome).

Not the ostrich-like way please!

Menzingen tries to axe the good Bishop for about three years now. (And that's why, for example, Krah who works for Bp Fellay and other superiors could insult Bishop Williamson constantly.)

Bishop Fellay wrote in this letter that he "ordered" to stop the Eleison Comments several times. So Bishop Williamson had a good time to think in peace about continuing or discontinuing his graceful preaching. Could this be the reason for the nice new web-site www.dinoscopus.org which went online just a few weeks ago?

Indeed nobody has the right to stop a good bishop from fulfilling his duty to preach and defend the Faith.
Unfortunately the double-thinking Bishop Fellay doesn't understand it because for several years he's not defending the whole faith anymore -- for example when he fawns upon the first and most vicious enemies of our Lord Jesus Christus, the anti-christian Jews, and propagates Vatican II untruths like "The Jews are our elder brothers" etc.

Quote

They couldn't care less about Bishop Williamson trotting off on his own with a marginal number of clergy (5 at most).

Newrome cares.

Unfortunately no majority of the SSPX priests support Bishop Williamson (which shows the bad state of the society). But you give a random shot by saing "5 at most". Or do you mean just the German-speaking zone? Because then you would be about right. :-)

Quote

This indiscretion by Bishop Williamson and Pinnay just pulled the last teeth out of the SSPX.

That's an unfair accusation against Bishop Williamson. Don't do it.

Let's wait and see what happens.

Ethelred · « **Reply #22 on:** October 14, 2011, 08:21:14 AM »

Quote from: Thursday

So, it appears that Bishop Williamson has two choices. He can be present at these meeting s and look at the preamble if he produces an oath in writing that he will not reveal its contens AND that he will stop publishing his online letter.

That's a precise and good summary.

Quote

Why doesn't Bp Fellay just ask him to drop dead? For all practical purposes Bishop Williamson has already been kicked out of the SSPX.

Yes, that's the point.

hollingsworth · « **Reply #23 on:** October 14, 2011, 09:19:01 AM »

Ethelred:

Quote

I heard from a trustfully source that the letter is authentic, but confidential. I'm sure Bishop Williamson didn't publish it, and so he's not to blame.

Yes, I too have heard from the most trustworthy of sources. The letter is genuine, and Bp. W did NOT publish it. However, the matter has been handled rather carelessly, and whether or not the bishop must bear some responsibility for that carelessness, the jury is still out.

Anna1959 · « **Reply #24 on:** October 14, 2011, 10:16:42 AM »

Quote from: ManofGosh

Half my family was confirmed by Bishop Williamson, and the other half by Bishop Fellay, and one lonesome to Bishop Tissier. I have been to the seminary(to visit) and met them there also.

May the Lord keep safe and united the Bishops of the SSPX!

Mary Queen of Heaven, pray for us!
St. Pius X, pray for us!
ArchBishop Lefebvre, pray for us!

I was confirmed by Archbishop Lefebvre, so where does that leave me? Which side do you think he would be with? I'd say Bp Williamson!