Author Topic: Letter from Bishop Fellay to Bishop Williamson (Read 76467 times)

Ethelred · « **Reply #150 on:** October 25, 2011, 01:54:38 AM »

Quote from: Diego

If you think it Catholic and even laudable for a bishop:

(1) to publicly disparage a fellow bishop as "uranium" and "hand grenade"
(2) to disparage "Anglo-Saxon circles"
(3) to conflate the Holy Family, true Jews, with the ѕуηαgσgυє of Satan
(4) to submit to "Jєωιѕн fables" (Titus 1:14) as though they were Catholic dogma
(5) to fail to "Preach the word: be instant in season, out of season: reprove, entreat, rebuke in all patience and doctrine." (2 Timothy 4:2)
(6) to make a Zionist influential in Society finances
(7) to allow the flagship English-language publication to contradict St. Paul to canonize "The Saint of the Sanhedrin"
"et cetera, et cetera, et cetera,"

you reveal the value of your discernment and opinions.

Excellent points.

Quote from: Forum

I'm sure Diego appreciates your support, but let's give others a turn.

Ethelred · « **Reply #151 on:** October 25, 2011, 01:55:54 AM »

Quote from: hollingsworth

Quote
The motive that matters is the motive that prompted Bp. Fellay to pen the letter (and then claim the letter was an "accident").

Sounds pretty desperate, doesn't he? It will be the first letter ever, to my knowledge, deliberately written, posted as an email, or sent snail mail, and then explained away later as an "accident."

Very well said, dear Hollingsworth. :-)

Quote from: Forum

I'm sure hollingsworth appreciates your support, but let's give others a turn.

hollingsworth · « **Reply #152 on:** October 26, 2011, 06:53:13 AM »

Quote

Forum said:
I'm sure hollingsworth appreciates your (Nemmersdorf's?) support, but let's give others a turn.

I'm not certain why the "Forum" inserted this. If Nemmersdorf and/or I are hogging the subject, it is not apparent by the almost total inactivity on this thread over the past couple of days. Neither Nemm., nor I, nor anyone else, has taken a turn.

Ethelred · « **Reply #153 on:** October 26, 2011, 08:04:18 AM »

Quote from: hollingsworth

Quote
Forum said:
I'm sure hollingsworth appreciates your (Nemmersdorf's?) support, but let's give others a turn.

I'm not certain why the "Forum" inserted this. If Nemmersdorf and/or I are hogging the subject, it is not apparent by the almost total inactivity on this thread over the past couple of days. Neither Nemm., nor I, nor anyone else, has taken a turn.

Sorry for the confusion! I should have mentioned that the forum "said" this just to me when I tried to up-vote (= +1) your article. It's because of Matthew's voting system which allows the users only a certain percentage of up (or down) votes on a a single person before others must vote on this person, too. Distributed ... something.
Now I've reached my limit with voting up your good articles, so others have to vote before the forum allows me to vote on your articles again. Next time I'll just write "Agreed" or so instead of copying what the forum "said" to me.

hollingsworth · « **Reply #154 on:** October 26, 2011, 08:55:04 AM »

Quote

It's because of Matthew's voting system which allows the users only a certain percentage of up (or down) votes on a a single person before others must vote on this person, too. Distributed ... something.
Now I've reached my limit with voting up your good articles, so others have to vote before the forum allows me to vote on your articles again. Next time I'll just write "Agreed" or so instead of copying what the forum "said" to me.

Oh, so that's it. OK. I don't come on this forum that often so the moderator's folkways are not that familiar to me.