Translated from Spanish http://nonpossumus-vcr.blogspot.com/2019/12/carta-de-un-lector-la-neo-fsspx-y-vigano.htmlUntil the day of the date, twelve days after its publication, the FSSPX continues without echoing the extraordinary and courageous " Act of accusation to Pope Francis and of love for the Church " of HE Monsignor Carlo María Viganò.Of course, the FSSPX fans - always so moderate - call us the resistant "extremists", "exaggerated" and in other ways not friendly or measured. But will they say the same about Bishop Viganò? It seems they prefer to ignore it, which is worse. This man is playing his life and is saying things with a force and consequence in relation to the defense of the faith, which Mgr. Lefebvre could have said. Let us assume that if our founder lived today, he would say these same things and would not remain silent, in the expectation of dialogues with Rome in the style of those of Rome with communist China. Dialogues of softening and wear, as part of the Marxist dialectic with which the enemy is stunned and confused, causing him to abandon combat. Or do you fight and dialogue at the same time?
It would be expected that the FSSPX will not only make known that magnificent docuмent of Msgr. Viganò, but that it will endorse it and give its support to a man persecuted by the modernists whom they say they oppose. But is it possible to expect such a thing from a congregation that has resumed "doctrinal discussions" with those who are thoroughly demolishing everything they can of the Church? With whom have they introduced idolatry into the Vatican temple? With whom have they put themselves at the service of the enemy world of Christ, represented by the UN? With those who viciously insult and outrage the Blessed Virgin Mary?
In relation to the latter, it is interesting to see that, after Francisco's scandalous homily at the feast of the Virgin of Guadalupe, the FSSPX had no choice but to report the Bergoglio attack on the Marian Corredency. But, the news has lasted very little in the main page of its site fsspx.news. Already a whole barrage of other news - much less relevant, of course - has populated the page.
By the way, it can be seen in the handling of information, how the FSSPX operates. It is the fold that has already been pointed out by many observers. The title of the news, is absolutely objective in terms of the fact, that is, that the FSSPX is managed simply as a news agency:
Pope Francis describes the "Redemption of the Virgin Mary" as nonsense
The heading of the note does the same:
During the homily for the celebration of the Feast of Our Lady of Guadalupe in the Basilica of San Pedro, on December 12, 2019, Pope Francis expressed contemptuously about a title given to the Virgin Mary for the Tradition of the Church.
Already in the body of the article, he points out the scandalous and impious character of Francisco's words:
Even when it is not a solemn, even ordinary, teaching, the act is outrageously scandalous: with amazing lightness, the vicar of Christ suddenly destroyed the title of Mary Co-redemptrix. This denial is impious because it is a deeply rooted tradition that has been adopted and developed by several of its predecessors, at least until before the Second Vatican Council.
Which returns to the last subtitle:
An outrageous impiety
See that these three words could have been placed with all justice and truth: A scandalous impiety , in the title of the article. But it has been preferred to appear in principle as "impartial", for later and below, say what you think. Since the official sites of the Fraternity report only of their internal life, it is the news site - in their four languages - that pours their position before the events that occur in the life of the Church. And this news site tells us on its cover "News and analysis of the life of the Church." There is no opinion or controversy, but a generally neutral, impersonal, discolored, distant, empty, grayish language. Like the one that has been installed in the pulpits of its chapels. Now, was this always the tone, the way of expressing Monsignor Lefebvre? Is that the way to speak amid the heat of combat in the worst crisis of the Church of all time? Let's see how Viganò does it, let's read a few paragraphs of this exceptional docuмent:
The tragic parable of the present pontificate advances in a continuous succession of blows of effect. Not a day goes by without the Supreme Pontiff contributing from his supreme throne to dismantling the Petrina Headquarters using and abusing his supreme authority, not to confess but to deny; not to confirm but to lose; not to unite but to divide; not to build but to tear down.
Material heresies, formal heresies, idolatry and superficialities of all kinds: the Supreme Pontiff Bergoglio does not cease to stubbornly humiliate the supreme authority of the Church, demystifying the Papacy, as perhaps his illustrious colleague Karl Rahner would say. Its way of acting is aimed at violating the Sacred Deposit of Faith and disfiguring the Catholic face of the Bride of Christ with her words and her acts, with conceals and with lies, with her obvious gestures that boast of spontaneity but are meticulously devised and planned, and with which he exalts himself in an incessant narcissistic self-pomp, while humiliating the figure of the Roman Pontiff and eclipsing that of the Sweet Christ on Earth.
Their actions use magisterial improvisations, an improvised, liquid, insidious magisterium as quicksand; not only in the heights, at the mercy of journalists from all over the world, in those ethereal spaces that can show a pathological delirium of illusory omnipotence, but also in the field of the most solemn functions that should instill a sacred fear and reverent respect.
Pope Bergoglio uses the pachamama to try to defeat the Guadalupana. The enthronement of the Amazonian idol in the Altar of Confession in San Pedro was nothing other than a declaration of war on the Lady and Patroness of the Americas, who appeared to San Juan Diego defeated the demonic idols and conquered the Indians by taking them to the worship of the true and only God thanks to his maternal mediation. It is no legend!
For more than six years they have poisoned us with a false magisterium, a kind of extreme synthesis of all the equivocal statements of the Council and of the post-conciliar errors that have spread uncontrollably without the majority noticing it. Yes, because the Second Vatican Council opened something worse than Pandora's Box: the Overton Window, in such a gradual way that no one has noticed the alteration that has been carried out, of the true nature of the reforms, of its dramatic consequences, and it has not even been suspected who was actually handling the threads of this gigantic subversive operation, which modernist Cardinal Suenens called "the 1789 of the Catholic Church."
Someone who says these truths by fist deserves the support of all traditionalists. But, can the FSSPX put at risk its "regularization" and its "friendship" with Francisco, supporting a "rebel"?
The one who can understand that he understands.
Acaico
Topic: LETTER FROM A READER: THE NEO-FSSPX AND VIGANÒ (Read 371 times)