And 90% of the issue was dedicated to attacking Fr. Pfeiffer's "enemies", with only 10% of the issue discussing the SSPX, almost as an afterthought!

Ridiculous.

Can you link to it?  I have been unable to find it.

Thanks be to God, the relevance and reach of the "WRECKusant" is diminishing as more and more people wake up to the reality of Fr. Pfeiffer/Pablo and see the Recusant for what it is: the lying tool and media arm of Fr. Pfeiffer/Pablo.

As more and more people throw the WRECKusant into the rubbish bin where it belongs, fewer and fewer respectable websites dirty themselves by hosting it or linking to it.

Only a few small "free" blogs and some very low-traffic forums -- basically the most die-hard of Fr. Pfeiffer's fans -- link to it now.

I can't in good conscience promote such filth here on a high-traffic forum like CathInfo. But I'm sure a person could find it, especially in this day and age of search engines...

You basically will have to go into the back alleys of the Internet and deal with some "shady characters" to get your hands on a piece of filth like the Recusant, even though in your case it's for academic/educational purposes.

If a scientist wants to get his hands on some street drugs for some scientific purpose, he's going to have to deal with some shady characters and walk some dark alleys. That's the way it should be. What, should street drugs be available at Wal-mart, for the sake of all the scientists who need convenient access to street drugs for legitimate reasons? Of course not.

I hope this makes things clearer.

I like the name you found: WRECKusant.

I have another one: The RagAccusant. Because it is a dirty rag that accuses everybody who is not dirty.

Like your new avatar Patricius.

Now, if only you could drink beer like we Irishmen.

 :cheers: