Posted earlier by LordPhan, but buried in a long thread and I missed it myself! Lesson learned; here is the very important post:
Yesterday I saw a disturbing sermon from the District Superior of Canada, pronounce that:
1: That Bishop Fellay has done as much as or more for the SSPX than
Archbishop Lefebvre! (I kid you not, he said these words)
2: That a non-Catholic businessman told Menzingen that the SSPX were wrong
in their methods; that is one example of why they should join Rome
3: He attacked the priest who leaked the letter, calling it a mortal sin
to
do so. He said that if someone receives a letter from someone and shows it
to someone else, that it is a mortal sin. Well, I received an email and
showed it to someone today; I don't think I committed a mortal sin.
4: He disgustingly referred to Bishop Williamson as a h0Ɩ0cαųst denier.
5: He praised the Pope numerous times, including the above jab, which
amounted to “Rome was gracious enough to overlook one of our Bishops being
a
h0Ɩ0cαųst denier).
6: He essentially said we must obey Bishop Fellay without question. (How
can
one be a member of the SSPX, let alone one of its Superiors, and not know
what false obedience is!)
I’m not the only one who had a problem with this; there were several
others.
I got word from a friend that he had the complete opposite sermon from another famous SSPX Priest:
commented that the SSPX position has always been no practical deal without doctrinal solution, and that Bp Fellay seems dot be abandoning is. He then gave a sermon condemning relativism/subjectivism (basically a more detailed version of the 3 bishops' letter). After Mass he send the letters in question to everyone on the chapel email list and commented that BpF's response was "unconvincing".