Featuring diocesan priest, Fr. Sean Kilcawley (famous for his Theology of the Body):
"JPII, we wuv you!!"
I could only stand to watch the first 39 minutes of the video. Basically, Fr. Kilcawley supports the methodology of Pope Francis, when it comes to teaching about marriage. He says that Pope Francis teaches that a good homily always starts with proclaiming Christ's saving love, and that Christ wants to enter into our life and accompany us in all aspects of our life. Fr. Kilcawley further describes his view of Francis' teachings, which is that you move to catechesis, where we learn things like the 7 sacraments, the ten commandments, and the teachings of the Church. And then you move to doctrinal and moral conclusions.
Well, what Fr. Kilcawley doesn't point out is that Pope Francis doesn't ever teach any sound moral conclusions. Instead, Francis stays with the "Jesus loves you and wants to accompany you" bit, and it stops there.
Fr. Kilcawley describes JP2's teaching on Theology of the Body as also be about "accompaniment" and that the goal of his audiences on the ToB is all about accompaniment, without directly teaching on the topic but by turning attention to the roots from which the topic springs. He actually says that.
It's fine, IMO, to point out the roots of an issue, but the avoidance of "direct teaching of a topic" has, IMO, led to conciliar Catholics thinking that they can basically do whatever they want. So the methodology of Fr. Kilcawley and JP2 and Pope Francis doesn't actually work on a practical level. Not a surprise.
Evidently, the Neo-SSPX is fine with this sort of nonsense.