Columba has posted this on IA.

http://cathinfo-warning-pornography!/Ignis_Ardens/index.php?showtopic=11278

Quote

This topic is a includes contents from posts on the Kr_ah Remnant interview thread. Additionally, forum member Freshwater finds financial inconsistencies disclosed by Kr_ah here, not included in this topic.

Dr. Kr_ah,

In the Remnant interview, you stated ...that you were chosen by the Jaidhofer Foundation donor family to serve as trustee of their SSPX-supporting non-profit foundation. This family was subsequently identified in the related thread as the von Gutmanns of Austria. Fr. Florian Abrahamowicz has stated that you were involved with an 80 million Euro inheritance recieved in Austria from Baroness von Gutmann....

QUOTE (HMiS @ Nov 2 2012, 01:21 PM)
The von Gutmann family has nothing to answer for, with all due respect. Merely because of ancestry?

This is ridiculous and verges on calumny. None of my questions contain reference, implied or otherwise, to Jєωιѕн ancestry.

This topic is a includes contents from posts on the Kr_ah Remnant interview thread. Additionally, forum member Freshwater finds financial inconsistencies disclosed by Kr_ah here, not included in this topic.

Dr. Kr_ah,

In the Remnant interview, you stated that you were chosen by the Jaidhofer Foundation donor family to serve as trustee of their SSPX-supporting non-profit foundation. This family was subsequently identified in the related thread as the von Gutmanns of Austria. Fr. Florian Abrahamowicz has stated that you were involved with an 80 million Euro inheritance recieved in Austria from Baroness von Gutmann.

Unfortunately, the von Gutmanns are (perhaps inadvertently) now mixed up in a war against SSPX hardliners by the leadership over whether to proceed toward a deal with Rome at this time. If the von Gutmanns did not intend to become involved, then you Dr. Kr_ah are responsible. Since the family appointed you as trustee of their foundation, you represent them and should have shielded them from potential blow-back of this struggle by limiting your involvement or at least keeping it secret.

Questions asked by SSPX followers include:
Is the Jaidhofer Foundation family that of the deceased Baroness Rosa von Gutmann as described in this translation from the July, 2012 edition of "Region Kampseen" ? (courtesy of MauricePinay)


Were you or your fellow trustee Dr. Nicholas Ankershofen professionally involved with the SSPX prior to the von Gutmann designation.
Do you and Dr. Ankershofen have discretion over disbursement of funds to the SSPX?
Do Dr. Ankershofen or the von Gutmanns share your Zionist beliefs and were these beliefs a factor in your selection as trustee?
Do the von Gutmann heirs retain ultimate control over the Jaidhofer Foundation?
Have you or the von Gutmanns influenced the SSPX to distance itself from +Williamson or pursue regularization?
Do the von Gutmanns approve of your ongoing public attacks against Bishop Williamson?
If you were not employed by the SSPX prior to your trusteeship, then the von Gutmanns are unfortunately responsible for elevating to SSPX "management" the orchestrator of the Menzingen media attack against Bishop Williamson. If you do have discretion over disbursements to Menzingen, then your vigorous public support for Zionism puts the motivations for the heated denunciations of +Williamson into question. If the von Gutmanns did not ask you, as their designated trustee, to stop publicly attacking Bishop Williamson, then they share some responsibility for these attacks.

It is too bad the von Gutmanns did not restrain you earlier. Perhaps they never expected their association with you to become widely known. If the von Gutmanns do not now dissociate themselves from the anti-Williamson campaign, they become notoriously connected because of your central role in it. If the von Gutmanns are involved and they retain control of the Jaidhofer Foundation, they would be like a dog wagging the Menzingen tail with 80 million Euros worth of clout. +Fellay could not proceed along his path of radical change while at the same time keeping the money without von Gutmann acquiescence, at the very least.

You have have recently posted on this forum and stated that you regularly monitor postings by traditionalists concerning your activities. Fr. Rostand has recently stated that he and other SSPX officials also regularly monitor the trad forums. One can reasonably expect that you will learn of the circuмstantial evidence presented on this forum linking the von Gutmanns with the anti-Williamson campaign. You have the means to relay said evidence to the family. If there is no clarification forthcoming regarding these apparent linkages exposed by the occasion of your interview, the evidence is further validated. Silence in this case would equal consent or no contest. Traditionalists who interpret the recent changes in the Society as an attack against the legacy of Archbishop Lefebvre would thereby have justification to suspect the von Gutmanns as one of the primary instigators.

There is a war against Bishop Williamson and the legacy of Archbishop Lefebvre, but it is necessary to avoid harming noncombatants according to the rules of Just War theory. If anyone finds the circuмstantial linkages between the von Gutmanns and the anti-Williamson campaign to be wrong (detraction or calumny) or exaggerated, please make known you concerns.

The French speaking world continues to discuss "L’affaire Krah : les dessous de l’affaire Williamson"
02/11/2012
http://www.les-intransigeants.com/2012/11/laffaire-krah-les-dessous-de-laffaire-williamson/

quo vadis:

Quote

I could hardly care whether Krah was Jєωιѕн or not. What's most important is his disturbing connections and his rabid Zionism.

I disagree.  I think his ethnic lineage is very important.  He may have been born Catholic, and baptized Catholic as he affirms.  But, then again, he may be a lying jew.  Jews are liars.  I think it is very important to know what his roots are.   Sorry, but for you to say that you care less, I think, is disingenuous.