Has the following been posted here? Will the priests of the 'pious union' still attempt to deny the sacraments whilst the Jєωιѕн hand is at work within the SSPX?


http://cathinfo-warning-pornography!/Ignis_Ardens/index.php?showtopic=11233&st=225

Here is Max Krah with his client, the Rothschild-Gutmann heir, DeBeers relative and SSPX benefactor, Guntard Gutman.

Freshwater has posted the following.

http://cathinfo-warning-pornography!/Ignis_Ardens/index.php?showtopic=11233&st=250

Just bringing this back to the "interview":

I am of the opinion that the “interview” came at a very curious time. I am of the opinion that this “interview” had to have the approval of Menzingen. I am also of the opinion that Mr. Siscoe asked some very poorly researched questions. I think that his homework was lacking.

For example, he asked Dr. Kr ah :
QUOTE
Siscoe:  There is another company that is mentioned as well, Laetitia AG.  Can you tell us about…”.

Anyone who has done their homework, would know it was a lame question.

A far better question has been asked before, regarding the company that is nominated as Auditor for Dello Sarto AG, and that company is Fidartis Revisions AG.

The background of the auditors for Dello Sarto AG:

QUOTE

Company Auditors:
19-1-09 to 8-6-10  Grant Thornton auditing AG
8-6-10 till present: Fidartis Revisions AG

Interesting facts about Fidartis Revisions AG:
One of the company’s signature authority is a Mr. Peter Josef Müller

Some interesting facts regarding Mr. Peter Josef Müller :-
Director of Company:  Laetitia AG since 29-5-09
Administration board signatory of Laetitia AG: Maximilian Kr ah (individual signatory)

Peter Josef Müller replaced Peter Hochstrasser on the Board of Fidartis Revisions AG on the 9-7-10 with him having Joint Signatory Authority. Furthermore, Dello Sarto AG appointed Fidartis Revisions AG as auditors the month previous.



I think that a far better question has been asked previously:
QUOTE

Can anyone see a potential issue here? There is an obvious red flag when an auditor has a close business relationship with a person who has a single signatory authority within the company that has appointed those auditors. Not suggesting anything inappropriate has occurred, except for the fact that this needs to be noted for any potential conflict of interests.


Dr. Kr ah – are these potential “conflict-of-interest” issues, or are these “close-hand” relationship commonplace AND ethical? Was “Grant Thornton” auditors sacked for a reason, or was it better for the SSPX to have auditors that had closer business ties?


Moving on to the question of Dello Sarto AG.

Here is the question posed:
QUOTE
Siscoe:  Let’s discuss some of the internet rumors.  Can you tell us about the company, Dello Sarto AG?  What was your affiliation with that company, and the status of that company today?
Kr ah:  Yes, the first thing to realize is that a corporation prevents liability.  This is something that is widely known and is a common practice for the SSPX, especially in the US.  Dello Sarto was established to receive a large inheritance, which was expected to come but never did.  So now we have a completely empty corporation that we will shut down. The rumors were complete nonsense…..


Wow – I imagine that this has been a very expensive exercise, that is, setting up an “AG” company along with all its government requirements, having it audited for the past few years, and then shelving it. All for nothing! Incredible!

As an aside, here are the potential companies that can be formed in Switzerland:
See:
http://www.healyconsultants.com/company-in...-formation.html

QUOTE
Switzerland is one of the most politically and economically stable countries in the world. Switzerland is divided into 23 Cantons, each with its own tax system. There are two types of Swiss companies best suited to foreign investors: the AG (corporation or joint stock company) and a GmbH (limited liability company). The following information will help you determine whether company formation in Switzerland is the optimum corporate structure to fulfill your international objectives.


A Swiss GmbH requires a minimum of two shareholders, while an AG requires three. The minimum capital requirement for a GmbH is CHF20,000 Swiss francs (approximately US$21,000) and CHF100,000 (approximately US$105,000) for an AG company. One director must be resident in Switzerland.


Dr. Kr ah – was it based on your advice that Dello Sarto was established as an “AG” company rather than the lesser “GmbH” type company?

You stated that its purpose was to receive a “large inheritance”. Could you please explain to us ignoramuses of the reasoning behind the establishment of the “AG” style company, and not another “Trust” or “GmbH” type company? Can you please explain the "lack of liability" in the Trust or "GmbH" structures, that justified an "AG" corporation?

Since Dello Sarto AG is a public company, can you tell us who the shareholders/shareholding of the company are (which is not secret, but us plebs need to pay to find out)?


Another question asked by Mr. Siscoe about your MBA programme was poorly researched:

QUOTE

Siscoe: Another rumor is that the Society paid for your MBA program.  Is there any truth to that?
Kr ah: Absolutely not!  I paid on my own.


Maybe it was a very carefully worded question, because if Mr. Siscoe had done his homework he would have found that you listed your “Sponsor or employer” for the EMBA-Global programme as Jaidhofer Foundation.

As trustee for the Jaidhofer Foundation, I think that it is fair and reasonable that trustees get paid for the work that they do for the Trust.

So the correct question that Mr. Siscoe should have asked is “Dr. Kr ah, Another rumor is that the Jaidhofer Foundation paid for all or part your MBA program. Is there any truth to that?”

Dr. Kr ah – you call people who love and are concerned about the state of Society of St. Pius X (particularly since 2008/2009 - that must have been a very busy year for you!) “stalkers”. Well, welcome to politics. You wanted to be a politician, but most politicians accept that they are under public scrutiny and have a duty to be open to that scrutiny. You hold a lot of influence with regards to SSPX “management”, and potentially in regards to its direction – in let’s say – its “secular” interests.

Dr. Kr ah – I am of no significance within the SSPX, you are. I can remain anonymous, and it matters none because I have only ever asked about the SSPX business structures – based on published FACTS, which anyone can obtain. I have never questioned your beliefs, values, or associations, outside those SSPX related business structures. You are [now] well known within the Society. The Society has changed, whether we like that or not. That fact is undeniable. It is curious that many major changes happened in 2008/2009 and many of these things were done in secret (well – from the laity and many of the Priests at least). When there is a change in course, a logical thinker has to ask the question: “What’s happened, what’s different?”

Do you say that we shouldn’t be concerned about a perceived abnormality in the situation, or something that is perceived to be suspicious? Or should we just sit back and watch the world go by? Note: I am not blaming you, you have been given directions. In reality, it’s the “management” that should be answering the questions. But since you have been given the liberty (by management) to speak on these matters, I hope that you, out of charity, can answer the above “correct” questions so that concerns can be alleviated.

If these particular questions are ignored, then concerns will remain. And we don't want that do we?

"Prudence" used to conceal abject submission to the ѕуηαgσgυє's commands is a runner-up.

It seems "prudent" not to offend the new overlords until one realizes that traditional Catholicism cannot exist in under these particular overlords. Catholics supporting families may not be able to speak out publicly, but they can teach their children the truth.

The word is spreading.

http://cathinfo-warning-pornography!/Ignis_Ardens/index.php?showtopic=11268

Have you all read the latest Remnant Newspaper article on the interview with "He who shall remain nameless"?

Indeed we have,Dolorosa.

There is broad agreement with this analysis from Freshwater

I am of the opinion that the “interview” came at a very curious time. I am of the opinion that this “interview” had to have the approval of Menzingen. I am also of the opinion that Mr. Siscoe asked some very poorly researched questions. I think that his homework was lacking.

The interview raised many new questions and the concerns have not been alleviated.

Michael Hoffman weighs on the interview [link: http://revisionistreview.blogspot.com/2012/11/interview-with-zionist-agent-maximilian.html]

Thursday, November 01, 2012
Interview with Zionist agent Maximilian Krah
(Krah is the attorney for the Society of Saint Pius X as administered by Bishop Bernard Fellay)

Editor's Note: Bishop Fellay is the prelate who expelled Bishop Richard Williamson from the SSPX. Maximilian Krah is the attorney who was assigned by Fellay to "defend" Bishop Williamson against prosecution in Germany for blaspheming the sacred relics of the religion of h0Ɩ0cαųstianity, which is illegal in the German state. In the course of "defending" Williamson Krah actually attacked and insulted him in front of the German court.

Krah is an associate of the murderous Israeli army and has attended an Israeli army training event as a "tourist" as well as a fund-raiser for Tel Aviv University. He assures the interviewer that this all very innocent on his part.

Krah claims that Williamson was given Pressac's report on the alleged homicidal gas chambers to study "for a year" but he "failed" to do so. What actually transpired was that Bishop Williamson made contact with a revisionist researcher after a worldwide explosion of media venom was directed at him after he granted, on German soil, an interview with a Swedish television station. In the course of the interview he did not "deny the 'h0Ɩ0cαųst." He questioned the existence of homicidal gas chambers in Auschwitz-Birkenau.

As the media lynch mob grew in intensity, Bishop Williamson wanted to have access to the latest revisionist research on the subject of the gas chambers. The revisionist researcher he contacted in turn organized an international team of researchers and historians, led by an American editor (who I do not have permission to name), other youtheful revisionist historians, as well as the eminent Dr. Arthur Butz and Dr. Robert Faurisson.

Bishop Williamson carefully studied the docuмents and texts these scholars kindly made available to him. These included large portions of the Pressac material, because Pressac, toward the end of his life, threw up his hands in frustration and disgust over trying to scientifically prove the existence of homicidal gas chambers. Yet Mr. Krah is either too ignorant or too duplicitous to acknowledge Pressac's failure and instead invokes Pressac as a means of discrediting Williamson's skepticism toward the gas chamber dogma.

Why didn't Krah and Fellay study the books of Faurisson, Butz, Samuel Crowell, Carlo Mattogno, Germar Rudolf and Fred Leuchter? Why was the burden of reading  and study on Williamson alone? Why does the Catholic Church sanctify and unquestioningly uphold secular consensus history that has no bearing on the Faith of Jesus Christ? Indeed, some would say that Auschwitz has replaced Calvary as the central ontological event of western history. In Europe there are no laws against blaspheming Jesus Christ or denying His resurrection. Only the relics of h0Ɩ0cαųstianity are protected from scrutiny in Europe by the threat of criminal prosecution. h0Ɩ0cαųstianity is the de facto civil religion of Europe; the last truly believed religion in that otherwise largely agnostic continent.

In the interview Krah claims that the Israeli Zionists are the defenders of Christian shrines in the Holy Land. Krah makes no mention of the Israeli attacks on the Church of the Nativity during the Israeli h0Ɩ0cαųst in Jenin, during which the Church of the Nativity was shot up by Israeli soldiers and others churches bombed. He makes no mention of the large number of Palestinian Christians who have been driven out of Palestine or murdered by the Israelis. He makes no mention of the constant vandalism and assaults on Christian Churches by тαℓмυdic terrorists. He makes no mention of the fact that Christian misionary activity is banned in the Israeli state. Spreading the Gospel of Jesus Christ in the land of Christ is forbidden by the Israelis, but Krah praises them. He writes, "And there is also a rising group of so-called Hebrew Catholics, who are converted Israeli Citizens."

Really, Mr. Krah? Who converted them and where were they converted? Where do they reside in the Israeli state and where is there home church in the Israeli state?

Has Mr. Krah bothered to ask native Palestinian Christians who they would rather be ruled by -- fellow Palestinians or Israelis? The Palestinians have no voice in Krah's obsequiously Zionist narrative.

In Maximillian Krah we have a very serious and committed Zionist agent operating inside the highest levels of the SSPX, by Bishop Fellay's mandate.

The following interview with Mr. Krah was published in The Remnant newspaper. The Remnant's senior adviser is Mr. Christopher Ferrara who has excoriated Bishop Williamson. It seems that Mr. Ferrara knows for a fact that large numbers of people were gassed to death in Auschwitz. He also knows for a fact that it was Arab terrorists from the caves of Afghanistan who brought down the World Trade Center, and Building Seven of the WTC.  Using the publishing facilities of the Remnant, Mr. Ferrara has heaped abuse and contempt on Bishop Williamson for doubting execution gas chambers and believing that 9/11 was an inside job.

The Church of Jesus Christ is called to be counter-cultural; a pilgrim church in the midst of worldly people and their lies and hoaxes. Yet we observe in both the Vatican and the SSPX an imprimatur extended to establishment propaganda which is made holy and incuмbent upon Catholics to believe, on pain of expulsion. This is truly a perversion of everything for which Jesus Christ stood. The fact that Bishop Bernard Fellay has Zionist agent Krah installed in the inner circle of the SSPX tells us all we need to know about Fellay and the current direction of his "traditional Catholic" SSPX.  --Michael Hoffman  www.revisionisthistory.org

24 pages trying to prove Max Krah is Jєωιѕн????  

We're hopeless.

The Neo-Caths will march on and toss us aside like yesterday's news while we kill each other over trivia.