1. This whole "fake news" thing is ridiculous. Apart from a few money-making "click bait" sites started by greedy entrepreneurs, there is no such thing as "fake news". At least not enough of these sites to be a problem. Now there is such a thing as ALTERNATIVE NEWS or the ALTERNATIVE MEDIA, which has a better track record in serving up the truth than the MainStreamMedia, but I digress.

So moving on to the "fake resistance".

Virtually all in Fr. Pfeiffer's camp/cult love to use this term, applying it to anyone claiming to be Resistance but rejecting the Josephine Primacy of Fr. Joseph Pfeiffer. In other words, the pejorative "fake resistance" is applied to those in "Schism" with the "Papal Seat" in Boston, KY.

But honestly, what are they really trying to claim? If Bishop Williamson, Fr. Zendejas (et al.) are "fake Resistance", then what kind of game are they allegedly playing?

I assume the charge is that the "fake Resistance" is some kind of PLANT or CONTROLLED OPPOSITION. But a plant for WHOM? Who is their true boss? Who are they truly, behind the mask?

1. Are they Diabolical/Freemasons?
2. Are they Novus Ordo?
3. Are they Liberals?
4. Are they SSPX?

All of these possibilities are equally ridiculous to any thinking man, when applied to subjects such as Bishop Williamson, Fr. Zendejas, and others.

I think Occam's Razor must come into play, namely

5. Are they bona fide Resistance, simply not wishing to work under the flailing incompetence of Fr. Pfeiffer's leadership and/or not wishing to work alongside an apostate "right hand man" such as Pablo?

I think most reasonable, thinking men would conclude with #5.

There is simply NO EVIDENCE for the other 4, and so the charge must be thrown out.

Furthermore, there is plenty of evidence for explanation #5. Fr. Zendejas is causing a HUGE headache for the SSPX with the few chapels he's managed to set up. They are watching him closely, opposing his every action, etc.

Could you imagine an undercover cop that went SO FAR to convince the drug lords that he wasn't a plant, that he KILLED two of his fellow police officers, plus participated in a drive-by shooting of a small business, killing 15 civilians? No way! An undercover cop (or "plant") would never go THAT far to produce a cover story or make himself convincing to the group he has infiltrated.

In other words, at what point does the damage Fr. Zendejas is doing to the SSPX outweigh the "damage" he is doing to the Resistance as an "infiltrator"?

I invite everyone of good will -- friend or foe -- to investigate for themselves. What is the population of Fr. Zendejas' first chapel up in Connecticut? Is it holding steady/growing, or are the people slowly leaving back to the SSPX? Has Fr. Zendejas been honestly doing everything he can to set up PERMANENT locations (Sunday Mass, schools, etc.) which allow parishioners to leave the SSPX on a long-term basis? (Anyone can "home alone" for 6 months. 4 years is more of a problem.) I think the evidence shows that Fr. Zendejas has been going everything he can to build up the Resistance and completely undermine the SSPX. His good works are limited only by funding, and the number of hours in a day.

Likewise, let's look at the behavior and actions of Bp. Williamson. He has made several large Confirmation tours at his advanced age. He has also consecrated 2 new bishops -- which is a huge shot in the arm for the Resistance and a huge setback for the SSPX. He is also willing to confirm all Traditional Catholics that need the Sacrament. He would even come to Boston, KY, if they would get rid of Pablo. But Fr. Pfeiffer refuses for whatever bizarre reason.

These people (who do their thinking with Fr. Pfeiffer's brain) claim that Fr. Zendejas or Bishop Williamson is a friend of the SSPX? With friends like that, who needs enemies!

Meanwhile, we have Fr. Pfeiffer spending a ridiculous percentage of his ammunition on gunning down his fellow Resistance priests and the only 3 Resistance bishops. Strictly speaking, there is much more evidence that Fr. Pfeiffer is the plant, since he is the one doing his level-best to destroy the Resistance as a whole, dialing it back to 2012 levels so that he can be "king" again among its desolated ruins, once the thrice-smashed remnant have no other alternatives but to embrace him as their savior.

And let's also point out: If Fr. Zendejas wanted to be a "plant", the first thing he would have done is taken a posture of servitude, humbly submitted to Fr. Pfeiffer's leadership, and joined Fr. Pfeiffer's organization, so he could destroy it from the inside. Right? Isn't that logical? Please correct me if I'm wrong here.

Hooray for having a favorite priest, but let's keep our brains turned on, and our eyes open to reality, shall we?

Is Fr Pfeiffer still actively bad-mouthing everyone else or has that died down a little bit?