Just Say No to the Marxist Anti-Catholic Newpope Francis-Bergoglio
 Under Francis-Bergoglio in a Newchurch "Personal Prelature"
 Lay Supporters of Fellay's Neo-SSPX Would Be Entirely Subject
 To Their Local Newchurch Bishops[/b]

 Any Time a Neo-SSPX Supporter Wants a Baptism, Marriage, Confirmation, or Burial
 Done by the Neo-SSPX, That Supporter Would Need Individual Permission
 From the Local Heretic Newchurch Bishop
 It Puts Neo-SSPX Supporters Completely Under the Thumb of Their Worst Enemies

http://www.traditio.com/comment/com1608.htm

scroll down to "Commentaries Aug 24-26,   2016"  Parts I,II, III




It is becoming easy now to forget that, also from the beginning, Archbishop Lefebvre's original SSPX had insisted that, no, doctrinal disputes had to be resolved first.
 The reasons for this necessity are obvious. For one, a traditional group of clerics does not want to find one fine day that it has bound itself to the heresies that had been hatched by liberalist periti (so-called "experts") at the Vatican II Anti-council (1962-1965), which introduced the anti-Catholic "New Mess," "New Sacraments," and "New Morality." It is from the foundation of doctrine that policies are made consistent, not the other way around.

Before Newrome's agents tried to shut down internet discussion of these sorts of issues (assaults that the TRADITIO Network, almost alone, has rejected), Newmonsignor Camille Perl and then his successor, Newarchbishop Guido Pozzo, have tried to force the Neo-SSPX to accept the "personal prelature" structure, the same structure that has kept Opus Dei under the control of the liberalists and Modernists of Newchurch. Note that very few Newdioceses allow Opus Dei's "Prelature of the Holy Cross" to open chapels in their territories.

Pozzo, in particular, believes firmly in the media dogma that if you repeat a bad idea or a lie often enough, it somehow becomes acceptable. In a post-objectivist age, if you want to force something on someone, you simply insist on it over and over and over again like a petulant child in a sandbox who is determined to get his way. The problem is that Pozzo has found a playmate in that sandbox who wants to appease him. That playmate is Bernie Fellay, Superior-Dictator of the Neo-SSPX. Archbishop Lefebvre would have told Francis-Bergoglio and his handmaidens to pound sand.

And what is a "personal prelature" in the Newchurch of the New Order? It is defined in Newcanons 294 to 297 of the anti-Catholic Novus Ordo 1983 Code. First of all, it is not a particular church that is equivalent to a Newdiocese under Canon 368. Secondly, it includes only clerics: it does not include laypeople. For example, it excludes monks, hermits, nuns, friars, and other religious brothers and sisters who are not deacons or presbyters. Religious and lay orders can be affiliated to the personal prelature, but they are not part of it. Lay associations can also be associated, but are not part of it either.

The consequence is that, under a personal prelature, lay supporters of Fellay's Neo-SSPX would be entirely subject to their local Newchurch bishops. Any time a Neo-SSPX supporter wants a baptism, marriage, confirmation or burial done by the Neo-SSPX, that supporter would need individual permission from the local heretic Newchurch bishop. It puts Neo-SSPX supporters completely under the thumb of their worst enemies. Better to be subject to the mullahs of Islam than to the Marxist and Modernist Newbishops.

It gets worse. Under Newcanon 297 every time Fellay's Neo-SSPX would like to open a first or new apostolate, e.g., a chapel, oratory, or church, in the territory of a Newchurch diocese, it would need permission from the local Newbishop: "The statutes are likewise to define the relationship of the prelature with the local ordinaries [Newbishops] in whose particular churches the prelature, with the prior consent of the diocesan bishop [emphasis added], exercises or wishes to exercise its pastoral or missionary activity."