Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 42 43 [44] 45 46

Author Topic: Joint Statement of SSPX-MC Priests: Fr. David Hewko & Fr. Hugo Ruiz V  (Read 28834 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Pax Vobis

  • Supporter
Re: Joint Statement of SSPX-MC Priests: Fr. David Hewko & Fr. Hugo Ruiz V
« Reply #215 on: August 27, 2023, 06:10:21 PM »
Catholic Knight, in 2 posts, you have shown the exact problem and limitation of your private-interpretation theology.  1) You chastise Meg because she doesn’t see the clear evidence that Francis is a manifest heretic.  2). Many of us say that Benedict was a manifest heretic, but you disagree.  

:laugh1:  Oh the irony.  
Logged

Offline Catholic Knight

Re: Joint Statement of SSPX-MC Priests: Fr. David Hewko & Fr. Hugo Ruiz V
« Reply #216 on: August 27, 2023, 07:55:15 PM »
Quote from: Pax Vobis on August 27, 2023, 06:10:21 PM
Catholic Knight, in 2 posts, you have shown the exact problem and limitation of your private-interpretation theology.  1) You chastise Meg because she doesn’t see the clear evidence that Francis is a manifest heretic.  2). Many of us say that Benedict was a manifest heretic, but you disagree. 

:laugh1:  Oh the irony. 

In which post did I chastise Meg because she doesn't see the clear evidence that Francis is a manifest heretic?
Logged

Offline NIFH

Re: Joint Statement of SSPX-MC Priests: Fr. David Hewko & Fr. Hugo Ruiz V
« Reply #217 on: August 27, 2023, 10:08:39 PM »
Quote from: Ladislaus on August 27, 2023, 12:08:45 PM
the Archbishop upheld the MAJOR of the SV position, namely, that the Holy Spirit protects the Papacy and does not allow it to destroy the Church to this degree.  He repeatedly affirmed that.  Father Ringrose, one of the founding thought leaders in the original Resistance, posted the audio of a speech given by the Archbishop where he explicitly stated this.
Repeatedly?  I have never found a second record of that statement.  In that speech, he did indeed agree with the proposition.  His ears were still ringing from the crisis blowing like a bombshell in front of his face.  He was groping for an understanding, mostly by instinct at that point, and almost entirely alone.  On the contrary, before 1976 was even over, he spoke on that proposition again, and did not say he agreed with it.
Logged

Offline Catholic Knight

Re: Joint Statement of SSPX-MC Priests: Fr. David Hewko & Fr. Hugo Ruiz V
« Reply #218 on: August 29, 2023, 06:37:35 AM »
Quote from: Pax Vobis on August 27, 2023, 06:10:21 PM
Catholic Knight, in 2 posts, you have shown the exact problem and limitation of your private-interpretation theology.  1) You chastise Meg because she doesn’t see the clear evidence that Francis is a manifest heretic.  2). Many of us say that Benedict was a manifest heretic, but you disagree. 

:laugh1:  Oh the irony. 

I ask you again: in which post did I chastise Meg because she doesn't see the clear evidence that Francis is a manifest heretic? 

You accused me of something, so please back it up.  Or are you going to be deaf and dumb as you were with the other question that you refused to directly answer?  
Logged

Offline 2Vermont

Re: Joint Statement of SSPX-MC Priests: Fr. David Hewko & Fr. Hugo Ruiz V
« Reply #219 on: August 29, 2023, 07:24:43 AM »
Quote from: Catholic Knight on August 27, 2023, 04:57:22 PM
I do not hold that Benedict XVI was a public manifest formal heretic.
Can you be specific as to why Bergoglio is and why Ratzinger is not? What is the specific difference between them in your opinion?
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 42 43 [44] 45 46
« previous next »