Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 23 24 [25] 26 27 ... 46

Author Topic: Joint Statement of SSPX-MC Priests: Fr. David Hewko & Fr. Hugo Ruiz V  (Read 28895 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Catholic Knight

Re: Joint Statement of SSPX-MC Priests: Fr. David Hewko & Fr. Hugo Ruiz V
« Reply #120 on: July 23, 2023, 04:07:51 PM »
Quote from: Pax Vobis on July 16, 2023, 07:39:49 PM
:facepalm:  Only the church has the authority to investigate and decide if the evidence is sufficient. 


The church is a monarchy with a hierarchical authority.  It is not a democracy nor does it allow (nor has it ever allowed) the kind of Protestant-grassroots-individualistic-decision-making which you describe. 

Nobody cares what you investigate, how you interpret canon law, what your conclusions are, nor any opinion you have on ANYTHING related to Catholicism.  Your opinion matters 0%.  If you think it does, you’re well on your way to following Martin Luther.

If Jorge Bergoglio publicly admitted that he is a heretic and none of the cardinals or bishops did anything about it, would you still consider him to be pope?
Logged

Offline Catholic Knight

Re: Joint Statement of SSPX-MC Priests: Fr. David Hewko & Fr. Hugo Ruiz V
« Reply #121 on: July 23, 2023, 04:49:58 PM »
Quote from: Meg on July 17, 2023, 12:19:54 PM
Does the 1917 Code of Canon Law define what constitutes a public defection from the Catholic Faith? I can't find that it does. But there needs to be an authentic interpretation of what constitutes a public defection from the Catholic Faith.

1917-code-of-canon-law-english.pdf (restorethe54.com)

Is holding publicly and pertinaciously to one heresy not sufficient?
Logged

Offline Incredulous

Re: Joint Statement of SSPX-MC Priests: Fr. David Hewko & Fr. Hugo Ruiz V
« Reply #122 on: July 23, 2023, 05:39:20 PM »
Quote from: Marulus Fidelis on July 11, 2023, 01:37:53 PM
Can confirm that since abandoning Lefebvrism my debates with non-Catholics were much more effective. People would always point to Francis and I'd sound delusional explaining how it doesn't matter what he does. The funny thing is I was never comfortable with that part but now it's clear as day to me.

Attended a Rosary rally in Boston where our group was being constantly harangued and heckled by protestants with loudspeakers.  One prot boomer targeted me as we were praying.
 
Although I would not engage him, he came in close and wanted me to defend Bergolio's public announcement of cancelling Hell.      The conversation did not last long, but I think I satisfied him.

I told him: "Bergolio is a Jєω".  He said "Oh!... okay" and walked away.
Logged

Offline Meg

Re: Joint Statement of SSPX-MC Priests: Fr. David Hewko & Fr. Hugo Ruiz V
« Reply #123 on: July 23, 2023, 06:13:14 PM »
Quote from: Catholic Knight on July 23, 2023, 04:49:58 PM
Is holding publicly and pertinaciously to one heresy not sufficient?

No, it is not. 
Logged

Offline Mark 79

  • Supporter
Re: Joint Statement of SSPX-MC Priests: Fr. David Hewko & Fr. Hugo Ruiz V
« Reply #124 on: July 23, 2023, 06:17:46 PM »
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 23 24 [25] 26 27 ... 46
« previous next »