Yes, I've read it several times. Very good indeed. I'm not defending the new Mass per se, I'm just just questioning if it is truly blasphemous. I agree that it is a watered down liturgy, but that's different than a blasphemous liturgy.
In December 2019, Father Peter Scott of the SSPX composed
a brief analysis of the new mass in which he explained its inherently sinful nature and how that nature was yet not ipso facto dispositive of the mass's invalidity. I think you might gain a useful perspective from reading this instruction of his. Note especially the nuanced care he takes in characterizing the new mass as sacrilegious.
It was, of course, Father Scott who, many years back, was entrusted with writing the official statement for the Society's website regarding the new mass and whether a Catholic could in good conscience actively participate in its celebration. The view he expressed—in brief, that the new mass is valid
in se but not licit to participate in—is still the Society's position.