Assuming we still live in a democratic system the vaccinated will be in a majority in most countries. So they will simply bring in a law that your medical records are sealed and asking your vaccine status is against your right to privacy. They might even expunge the medical records if it causes friction. The majority has some power.
Thus the above conversation might simply end up in him saying "no", because many will claim to be unvaccinated.
1. You're assuming the jabbed will stay alive long enough to benefit from privacy laws.
2. Most jabbed people are proud and open about their status, so why would they need privacy?
3. Every US-health-privacy law only pertains to businesses/govt. You can't outlaw some asking the question "Are you jabbed?" That's free speech (at least in the US).
4. It would be very easy to "spot a liar" when it comes to the jabbed conversation. You just keep probing the conversation and start making comments about health freedom and how the govt lies to us and natural remedies, etc. Most jabbed won't be able to handle the "anti mainstream, anti-sheeple" thinking and will explode with "jab righteousness!" and self-defense.
With that said, what percentage of young men and women in tradlands are vaccinated? A very low number I suspect. Way less than 10%.
Considering that we have the new-sspx, +Sanborn and +Dolan all arguing it's ok, I think 10% is WAY too low.
Only 1/3 of children aged 15-21 in the general population in the UK are vaccinated. Trads will be MUCH MUCH lower.
??
1. Teenagers aged 15-21 are one of the last categories to be able to take it. Too early to tally statistics.
2. Teenagers aged 15-21? What about ADULTS aged 22-35? They are the ones facing pressure from their jobs; they are ones in the "dating pool".
I have not see a mask for ages in the SSPX masses or the other Latin Masses I go to.
Sure, you don't see people wearing masks, but their priests are giving sermons about how it's ok to take the jab.
