When Arch. L. passed away, the media carried the news big time - and it was all negative. The media went after him. The result of this coverage was supposed to be that he was evil, and no one better even think of supporting his SSPX or the Latin Mass. They especially condemned him for the consecration of the four bishops.
We all know that when the liberals or leftists die, the media makes them out to be heroes. If Arch. L. was a mason, why was he not praised? If he was a mason, why did he worked AGAINST the masons in the Church?