We hear nowadays from the NSSPX that
“It was Rome that came to us. It was Rome that started the discussions.”The fact is, conciliar Rome wants anything that will “stick and sink” the SSPX. They always have in this fight. We have been going through 43-years of their ongoing “abuses and diseases”. Are the present SSPX leaders so gullible to take the bait this time?
If the Doctrinal discussions between the SSPX and Rome of 2009-2011 were a waste of time, as was stated by the SSPX leaders, then what reason (or fantasy) can Bishop Fellay say at the same time for us to believe in early 2012, and with favor, that Rome is “changing to tradition”? Weren’t the DOCTRINAL discussions a “waste of time” just 7-months prior?
If the SSPX will be so stupid and naive to play such a “sloppy” game of chess, then what do they expect if they see the results of their dialectic, that there is now “chaos” disturbing the unity of the SSPX.
If a CEO of a company seen the results of disunity from actions they have taken, he would immediately fix it; less he loose profits. Not Bishop Fellay. Sometimes, the children of this world are smarter than the children of light.
Then what could it be? Our Lord gives us the answer that explains such a “passionate” desire to continue on in a suicidal course. Self love, vain glory, and pride; the tempter from the desert. There is no other reason why a Bishop of the Catholic Church would pervert the course of its foundation with modernism to under mind the unity and salvation of the Church. Vatican II has done it. Thousands of Bishops all over the world have done it. Many Popes have done it. So is Bishop Fellay immune to the “doctrinal disease” of modernism?
“Wherefore he that thinketh himself to stand, let him take heed lest he fall. (1 Corinthians 10:12).So what is this pampering of Bishop Fellay for us to go into the “disease” of modernist Rome, when in fact, there is nothing of conversion from them to show us it is “clean”?
There leaves the explanation. It is a tactic called “bait and switch”. In fact, it is such an old game, a game that conciliar Rome, since Vatican II, has used successfully with the other 9-Traditional groups that had entrapped them. So why didn’t the present leaders learn from the others “mistakes”? Did Bishop Fellay know the history? He certainly did. Here are some links of many of his own writings describing the malady of this very dialectic.
http://cathinfo-warning-pornography!/Ignis_Ardens/index.php?showtopic=9838
And here:
http://www.cathinfo.com/catholic.php/Compilation-pre-2012-SSPX-position-against-a-practical-dealIf Bishop Fellay was so “staunch” back then in his writings in warning us about these methods of betrayals, then why the hush game now, to the opposite, that it is “ok”?
I will let the reader discover for themselves about the “disease” of modernism as it was designed in its origin to destroy all souls; regardless of personages, and crosses all boarders of time.
Is this disease of “spiritual cancer” the last battle of the Catholic Church? God knows…
Vatican II was certainly infected with it; its priests and Bishops are infected with it; and have ever since been trying to “prey” on others to apostate in using the same effective tactic -“bait and switch”.
Are the present SSPX leaders infected with this “disease of modernism” revealed in their 2012 Doctrinal Declaration, 2012 General Chapter’s 6-conditions, Bishop Fellay’s April 14, 2012 letter to the three SSPX Bishops, recent interviews, conferences, promoting the Novus Ordo, and in their other external expressions of compromising the Traditional Mass and the Faith? Are they now a “carrier of modernism” with the tactic of “bait and switch” to now infect others?
What is done in the darkness…will always come out in the light.
Be watchful, and pray…says our Lord, in seeking Wisdom, counsel, and discernment.
The SSPX has given to many of us the Faith, lets pray for them, and help them see the “cancerous disease” to be made clean.
Topic: Is the SSPX really gullible? (Read 4012 times)