.
As Paul Harvey would say, "Now you know the REST of the Story."
.
The [Fake] Recusant wouldn't print Fr. Chazal's Commentary because there isn't room!! HAHAHA
.
(Never mind the so-called (fictional?) interview of (the ...) Bishop Zendejas is referred to in the first page Editorial as being located on "Page 38" when in fact it's found on page 42  48 -- Taylor must have stretched out the format for several more pages after writing the Editorial.)
.
Thank you, Matthew, for setting the record straight.
.
In the end, unless someone makes a print-out of this thread, the only hard copy would be the print version of the [Fake] Recusant.
.

I need to clarify my position on this:

1. On the one hand, I believe that giving Fr. Pfeiffer a soapbox from which to spew his attacks on the (mainstream) Resistance is a bad thing. I hate to lend him CathInfo's readership and reach for such a dastardly cause.

2. Related to #1, it is the informed opinion of Fr. Chazal and other priests I've talked to that Fr. Pfeiffer thrives on, even needs, attention and excitement. He wants desperately to be relevant. Denying this to him would therefore be the best strategy to get him to repent of his public sins (lies, slander) against the Resistance bishops and priests.