Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Ex-OLMC seminarian ordained  (Read 18515 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Gwaredd Thomas

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 261
  • Reputation: +84/-16
  • Gender: Male
Re: Ex-OLMC seminarian ordained
« Reply #135 on: November 20, 2017, 12:39:05 PM »
  • Thanks!2
  • No Thanks!1
  • Off topic.  Please open a new thread or, better yet, PM eachother.
    What in blinkin' blue blazes are you talking about? I was replying to "AlligatorDicax's post", not you! So I would appreciate it if you would mind your own business and stop telling others what they should do or not do.
    Dduw bendithia chi! 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿


    Offline AlligatorDicax

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 908
    • Reputation: +372/-173
    • Gender: Male
    O.P. Banned/Re: Ex-OLMC seminarian ordained
    « Reply #136 on: November 20, 2017, 03:32:36 PM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • Off topic.  Please open a different thread if you want to bash someone.  Better yet, PM Matthew.

    Well!  CathInfo seems increasingly to be drawing impertinent newbies.  This one a CathInfo member for only 134 days thus far (counted hastily).  You seem to have overlooked some extenuating circuмstances or facts:

    Tradplorable has been banned.

    •  It was Tradplorable who rudely started this topic with an unjustifiable insult (i.e., he is its original poster).

    •  It was Matthew who chose to announce the banning in the midst of this topic (reply #60).  Perhaps he had decided not to give Tradplorable the ego-trip of seeing a topic devoted entirely to himself, which he'd could link to while lamenting his victimhood from the isolation & comfort of other forums.

    •  Matthew can loosen his observance of customary netiquette, in ways that dare to risk irritating a newbie, because he is the owner-moderator of CathInfo.

    Reading that [banning announcement in reply #60] has brightened my day substantially.  The end of a 76-day span, churning out postings at an average of nearly 8 per day, indicating a preöccupation with quantity not quality [....]

    •  I simply followed-up Matthew's posting, by commenting on his welcome action in the same topic in which he announced it.  Which provides me with a limited exemption, long established by Internet custom(s), to your complaint that my reply #131 is "off topic".


    Offline Gwaredd Thomas

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 261
    • Reputation: +84/-16
    • Gender: Male
    Re: O.P. Banned/Re: Ex-OLMC seminarian ordained
    « Reply #137 on: November 20, 2017, 04:54:01 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!1
  • Well!  CathInfo seems increasingly to be drawing impertinent newbies.  This one a CathInfo member for only 134 days thus far (counted hastily).  You seem to have overlooked some extenuating circuмstances or facts:

    •  It was Tradplorable who rudely started this topic with an unjustifiable insult (i.e., he is its original poster).

    •  It was Matthew who chose to announce the banning in the midst of this topic (reply #60).  Perhaps he had decided not to give Tradplorable the ego-trip of seeing a topic devoted entirely to himself, which he'd could link to while lamenting his victimhood from the isolation & comfort of other forums.

    •  Matthew can loosen his observance of customary netiquette, in ways that dare to risk irritating a newbie, because he is the owner-moderator of CathInfo.

    •  I simply followed-up Matthew's posting, by commenting on his welcome action in the same topic in which he announced it.  Which provides me with a limited exemption, long established by Internet custom(s), to your complaint that my reply #131 is "off topic".
    "Well!  CathInfo seems increasingly to be drawing impertinent newbies".

    Gosh, I certainly hope I don't fall into that category. I must admit I was a bit peeved when someone who I was not communicating with decides to insert themselves and tell me where to head-in.

    Sometimes me Welsh temper flares a wee bit. 🤬
    Dduw bendithia chi! 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿

    Offline Fanny

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 571
    • Reputation: +248/-408
    • Gender: Female
    Re: Ex-OLMC seminarian ordained
    « Reply #138 on: November 20, 2017, 07:32:13 PM »
  • Thanks!3
  • No Thanks!0
  • What in blinkin' blue blazes are you talking about? I was replying to "AlligatorDicax's post", not you! So I would appreciate it if you would mind your own business and stop telling others what they should do or not do.
    You are right.
    You won't hear from me again, nor will anyone on cathinfo.
    Adios.

    Offline St Ignatius

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1024
    • Reputation: +794/-158
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Ex-OLMC seminarian ordained
    « Reply #139 on: November 20, 2017, 09:19:15 PM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!2
  • You are right.
    You won't hear from me again, nor will anyone on cathinfo.
    Adios.



    Offline Gwaredd Thomas

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 261
    • Reputation: +84/-16
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Ex-OLMC seminarian ordained
    « Reply #140 on: November 20, 2017, 10:10:38 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!1

  • May y Duw da bendithio a'ch Cadw chi! 😇
    Dduw bendithia chi! 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿

    Offline TKGS

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 5768
    • Reputation: +4621/-480
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Ex-OLMC seminarian ordained
    « Reply #141 on: November 21, 2017, 07:31:16 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • You are right.
    You won't hear from me again, nor will anyone on cathinfo.
    Adios.
    We've heard these promises before.  They never pan out.

    Offline Meg

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 6173
    • Reputation: +3147/-2941
    • Gender: Female
    Re: Ex-OLMC seminarian ordained
    « Reply #142 on: November 21, 2017, 08:32:06 AM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!2
  • You are right.
    You won't hear from me again, nor will anyone on cathinfo.
    Adios.

    I'm sorry to see that you won't be posting anymore. But it may be better to stay away from this Den of Vipers.

    The owner of the forum is a good man, and he has a good wife. They can't help, for the most part, that most trads are a nasty bunch. That's just how it is.

    God bless you.
    "It is licit to resist a Sovereign Pontiff who is trying to destroy the Church. I say it is licit to resist him in not following his orders and in preventing the execution of his will. It is not licit to Judge him, to punish him, or to depose him, for these are acts proper to a superior."

    ~St. Robert Bellarmine
    De Romano Pontifice, Lib.II, c.29


    Offline Jaynek

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 3874
    • Reputation: +1993/-1112
    • Gender: Female
    Re: Ex-OLMC seminarian ordained
    « Reply #143 on: November 21, 2017, 09:02:38 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I'm sorry to see that you won't be posting anymore. But it may be better to stay away from this Den of Vipers.

    The owner of the forum is a good man, and he has a good wife. They can't help, for the most part, that most trads are a nasty bunch. That's just how it is.

    God bless you.
    To say "most trads are a nasty bunch" is a sweeping generalization and seems uncalled for in this situation.  It is pretty understandable for people to object to getting lectured about netiquette by a newbie; it does not make them nasty.  

    I suggest that we pray for Fanny and not make any judgments about "most trads".  Perhaps you could consider, Meg, whether your response is a sign of battle fatigue.  You have been involved in angry arguments lately and that may be colouring your perception of trads.