Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: IS HE OR ISN'T FELLAY A FREEMASON  (Read 34296 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Re: IS HE OR ISN'T FELLAY A FREEMASON
« Reply #25 on: May 13, 2019, 11:00:49 AM »
I agree, the percentages are up for debate, and we'll never know for sure. It's hard to nail that down.

However, the point (which can't be disputed) is this: when calculating the % pro- classic SSPX position, and the % pro-Modernist Rome, you have to take into account the large % of SSPX Faithful who are followers, apathetic, who will go along with whatever the SSPX leadership does.

This large % is anywhere from 50% up to 90%. One can debate the specifics, but not the general principle.
Absolutely. But how many people these days in SSPX parishes know what the position of the Archbishop was?

Offline Meg

Re: IS HE OR ISN'T FELLAY A FREEMASON
« Reply #26 on: May 13, 2019, 11:09:00 AM »
It's hard to determine the influences that +ABL was under and we hope for the best concerning his intentions.  

What is it exactly that's hard to determine regarding the influence that +ABL was under? Why would you question his intentions? 


Offline Matthew

  • Mod
Re: IS HE OR ISN'T FELLAY A FREEMASON
« Reply #27 on: May 13, 2019, 11:37:25 AM »
Absolutely. But how many people these days in SSPX parishes know what the position of the Archbishop was?
That's the problem. Most don't care to do any kind of reading/research to find out -- they just gobble up whatever seeds and acorns the SSPX priests thrown at them. 

Re: IS HE OR ISN'T FELLAY A FREEMASON
« Reply #28 on: May 13, 2019, 11:46:56 AM »
NO! You're totally missing an important point:
1/2 of them don't care, and will go whichever way the wind blows.

Another 1/3 is positively leaning in the new direction. Probably less than 1/6th is conservative or has any kind of strong feelings for sticking with +ABL's old SSPX.

It's even more complicated -- because many are conservative and want to stick with +ABL, but they are ignorant about what that means!

I don't think more than 1/3 is actively desiring a change towards Modern Rome.

You're right, I'm sorry, I had completely forgotten all the in-betweens. It's hard to imagine that anyone could possibly be lukewarm about it, but it's true that if 1/3 are actively for the changes, then the remaining 2/3 would be split up in a bunch of other boxes. The: 

"I don't know", 
"I don't care", 
"I'm not paying attention", 
"I'm confused", 
"I waver back and forth", 
"This is over my head", 
"This is above my pay grade", 

and finally a small portion would be actively against. That is beside the point that those who positively want the new direction are not all freemasons, I was just struck by the number, completely forgetting there are any positions beyond for or against.   

Offline Ladislaus

  • Supporter
Re: IS HE OR ISN'T FELLAY A FREEMASON
« Reply #29 on: May 13, 2019, 01:23:55 PM »
Very true.  The other 2 bishops have compromised just as much as +Fellay.

I'm not sure I agree.  +Tissier had been against the reunification efforts, but then caved.  Left to his own devices, he would not have gone down +Fellay's path.  +Galaretta I barely hear a peep out of.  It almost sounds like he doesn't care one way or the other, and hasn't cared since his consecration.