Author Topic: Is Father Ringrose dumping the R & R crowd? (Read 440681 times)

TKGS · « **Reply #1045 on:** May 13, 2018, 07:07:44 AM »

Quote from: 2Vermont on May 13, 2018, 07:03:57 AM

Quote from: TKGS on May 12, 2018, 08:37:35 PM
What do you mean "Novus Ordo Watch refused to publish"? Did you post this as a comment using DISQUS and Novus Ordo Watch deleted your post?
There are critical posts on many Novus Ordo Watch posts so I would be surprised that this would have been deleted. In general, Novus Ordo Watch only deletes comments when they stray from the topic. These comments seem to be on subject.

I noticed that a couple of posts were deleted on a different thread about Francis' latest heresy. Perhaps these were the same posts. If so, then this poster posted his post in the WRONG thread rather than on the Fr Ringrose thread. I suspect that THIS was the only reason why it was deleted.

This would make sense. I've just not seen Novus Ordo Watch delete topic appropriate criticisms--no matter how inane they are.

2Vermont · « **Reply #1046 on:** May 13, 2018, 07:15:15 AM »

Quote from: TKGS on May 13, 2018, 07:07:44 AM

I noticed that a couple of posts were deleted on a different thread about Francis' latest heresy. Perhaps these were the same posts. If so, then this poster posted his post in the WRONG thread rather than on the Fr Ringrose thread. I suspect that THIS was the only reason why it was deleted.

This would make sense. I've just not seen Novus Ordo Watch delete topic appropriate criticisms--no matter how inane they are.

Actually I just went back int here and it is there. This poster is probably new there and it had not been approved yet. In fact NOW actually responds to it.

drew · « **Reply #1047 on:** May 13, 2018, 03:07:08 PM »

Quote from: Ladislaus on May 13, 2018, 10:15:25 AM

So you continue with this calumny despite the fact that it's been explained to you at least a dozen times that this accusation was rooted in your inability to comprehend the English language and my use of the term revelation. You disputed that revelation (in English) could have the meaning with which I was using it, and I cited dictionary.com which listed my use of the term first and yours second.

You really are a bad-willed degenerate. You've got nothing else to rebut my arguments, so you keep dusting off this false accusation in desperation.

Ladislaus,

"Calumny"? "False accusations"? These are a links to your claim that the "Magisterium is not part of divine revelation." It does not matter whether your were claiming that the "Magisterium is not part (of the content) of divine revelation," or that the "Magisterium is not part (of the act) of revelation." Either way, it is a spectacular error with grave doctrinal implications that you have never corrected.

Re: Is Father Ringrose dumping the R & R crowd?
« Reply #1468 on: April 25, 2018, 08:07:46 PM »

Re: Is Father Ringrose dumping the R & R crowd?
« Reply #1521 on: April 27, 2018, 12:05:27 PM »

Re: Is Father Ringrose dumping the R & R crowd?
« Reply #1543 on: April 27, 2018, 01:25:21 PM »

Here are the links to your denying the correct definition of supernatural faith.

SECRET SPECIAL CHAPTER OF NEO FSSPX
« Reply #30 on: August 16, 2015, 08:08:35 AM »

SSPX Resistance News / SECRET SPECIAL CHAPTER OF NEO FSSPX
« on: August 16, 2015, 01:17:43 PM »

It is not easy to keep track of your posts Ladislaus because you are an expert on everything and cannot keep your mouth shut. You have, on this thread alone, posted more than 450 times. You make up nearly 25% of all posts on this one thread. You have more posts on this thread alone than I have in all my posts on CathInfo going back four years. The outstanding characteristic of your posts are a crude arrogant dismissal of opinions that are not your own, a failure to ever correct gross errors of fundamental first principles, a superficial flippant pretense of erudition, a routine quoting out of context, and the use demeaning language in approximately 90% of your posts on this thread alone.

Since you do not know the correct definition of the Magisterium and you do not know the correct definition of supernatural faith, you cannot possibly know what you are saying when you claim, "the magsiterium is the rule of faith" because you do not know the meaning of the terms of the proposition. You are only fooling those who want to be fooled. Unfortunately, there are plenty of them.

Now we know from your last post that you do not know what "calumny" is. Calumny is the detraction of another by lying. Actually, to accuse anyone of calumny when it is not is a good example of calumny.

Drew

drew · « **Reply #1048 on:** May 13, 2018, 05:16:35 PM »

Quote from: Ladislaus on May 13, 2018, 04:57:30 PM

You bumbling idiot, the second proposition is Catholic doctrine ... as taught even by Vatican I. The first is the distorted heretical meaning which you tried to tar me with due to your inability to understand English.

So, according to you, when the Magisterium defines a doctrine, the Magisterium is revealing the doctrine.

Ladislaus,

Why don't you shut up and let others read the posts that I have provided links. Let your own words speak for you. Let others see for themselves what kind a person you are. If these links do not demonstrate that I am telling the truth, then you will be vindicated and I put to shame. If they do in fact demonstrate what I claim, your protestations are to no avail and only further denigrate your reputation.

Re: Is Father Ringrose dumping the R & R crowd?
« Reply #1981 on: Today at 03:07:08 PM »

Drew

hollingsworth · « **Reply #1049 on:** May 13, 2018, 10:49:26 PM »

drew:

Quote

It is not easy to keep track of yo'ur posts Ladislaus because you are an expert on everything and cannot keep your mouth shut. You have, on this thread alone, posted more than 450 times. You make up nearly 25% of all posts on this one thread. You have more posts on this thread alone than I have in all my posts on CathInfo going back four years.

So maybe Lad is a "bad willed degenerate," and a "bumbling idiot" too. I mean, there's got to be some kind of degeneracy and idiocy at play here. Otherwise, a totally outrageous and embarrassing thread like this would not be approaching 40,000 views. But as long as Matthew allows this ridiculous food fight to continue, we can only expect more of it, I suspect.